Literature DB >> 35995483

Imaging Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsy in Assessment of Cervical Cancer.

Mansur A Ghani1, Joy Liau1, Ramez Eskander2, Loren Mell3, Tahir Yusufaly4, Sebastian Obrzut1.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The role of imaging has been increasing in pretherapy planning and response assessment in cervical cancer, particularly in high-resource settings that provide access to computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). In 2018, imaging was incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for cervical cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging is advantageous over CT for evaluation of the primary cervical cancer size and extent, because of superior contrast resolution. Furthermore, quantitative methods, including diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, show promise in improving treatment response and prognosis evaluation. Molecular imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT and PET/MRI can be particularly helpful in the detection of nodal disease and distant metastases. Semiautomated delineation of 3-dimensional tumor regions of interest has facilitated the development of novel PET-derived biomarkers that include metabolic volume and radiomics textural analysis features for prediction of outcomes. However, posttreatment inflammatory changes can be a confounder and lymph node evaluation is challenging, even with the use of PET/CT. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising tool that may be able to overcome some of the drawbacks inherent with imaging, such as limited ability to detect microscopic metastases or to distinguish between postchemoradiotherapy changes and residual tumor. Preliminary evidence suggests that liquid biopsy may be able to identify cervical cancer treatment response and resistance earlier than traditional methods. Future work should prioritize how to best synergize imaging and liquid biopsy as an integrated approach for optimal cervical cancer management.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35995483      PMCID: PMC9474655          DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   2.081


  93 in total

1.  Post-radiotherapy contrast enhancement changes in fast dynamic MRI of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  E A Boss; L F Massuger; L A Pop; L C Verhoef; H J Huisman; H Boonstra; J O Barentsz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Discrepancies between clinical staging and surgicopathologic findings in early-stage cervical cancer and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Chunlin Chen; Weifeng Zhang; Ping Liu; Guidong Su; Shipeng Gong; Weili Li
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  D Planchard; S Popat; K Kerr; S Novello; E F Smit; C Faivre-Finn; T S Mok; M Reck; P E Van Schil; M D Hellmann; S Peters
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Liquid Biopsy for Cancer: Review and Implications for the Radiologist.

Authors:  Jacob J Underwood; Rehan S Quadri; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Hriday Shah; Aravind R Sanjeevaiah; Muhammad S Beg; Patrick D Sutphin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Tumor perfusion studies using fast magnetic resonance imaging technique in advanced cervical cancer: a new noninvasive predictive assay.

Authors:  N A Mayr; W T Yuh; V A Magnotta; J C Ehrhardt; J A Wheeler; J I Sorosky; C S Davis; B C Wen; D D Martin; R E Pelsang; R E Buller; L W Oberley; D E Mellenberg; D H Hussey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Simultaneous changes of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging and pathological microstructure in locally advanced cervical cancer caused by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chun Fu; Xiaoyan Feng; Dujun Bian; Yan Zhao; Xiaoling Fang; Wanping Du; Lan Wang; Xiangquan Wang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Simultaneous multiparametric PET/MRI for the assessment of therapeutic response to chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy of cervical cancer patients: Preliminary results.

Authors:  Theresia Sarabhai; Alexander Tschischka; Vanessa Stebner; Felix Nensa; Axel Wetter; Rainer Kimmig; Michael Forsting; Ken Herrmann; Lale Umutlu; Johannes Grueneisen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 8.  Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging.

Authors:  Mohammed Saleh; Mayur Virarkar; Sanaz Javadi; Sherif B Elsherif; Silvana de Castro Faria; Priya Bhosale
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Human papillomavirus mutational insertion: specific marker of circulating tumor DNA in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Maura Campitelli; Emmanuelle Jeannot; Martine Peter; Emmanuelle Lappartient; Stéphanie Saada; Anne de la Rochefordière; Virginie Fourchotte; Séverine Alran; Peter Petrow; Paul Cottu; Jean-Yves Pierga; Olivier Lantz; Jérôme Couturier; Xavier Sastre-Garau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Predicting Cervical Cancer Outcomes: Statistics, Images, and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Wei Luo
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2021-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.