PURPOSE: To determine the patterns of failure in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy and evaluated for metabolic response with early posttherapy (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 238 patients with cervical cancer were reviewed. All patients were treated with a combination of external radiotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy. Two hundred and nineteen patients (92%) received concurrent chemotherapy. All patients underwent pretreatment FDG-PET, and posttherapy FDG-PET was performed within 8-16 weeks of the completion of radiotherapy. Posttherapy FDG-PET results were categorized as complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), and progressive disease (PD). Failure patterns were categorized as none, isolated local failure (central pelvis ± pelvic lymph nodes), distant failure, or combined local plus distant failure. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients (38%) who had a recurrence, 22 had isolated local failures, and 69 had distant failures (49 distant failures and 20 combined local plus distant failures). Of the 173 patients with a CMR, 40 (23%) experienced treatment failure. All 25 patients with PD experienced treatment failure, which was distant in 24 patients (96%). Among the 40 patients with PMR, no failure has been observed for 14 patients (35%). Of the 26 failures within the PMR group, 15 (58%) were limited to the pelvis. Differences in the patterns of failure between the three groups (CMR, PMR, PD) were statistically significant (chi-square test; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of failures after definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer include distant failures, even in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy. PMR within the cervix or lymph nodes is more commonly associated with isolated local recurrence.
PURPOSE: To determine the patterns of failure in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy and evaluated for metabolic response with early posttherapy (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 238 patients with cervical cancer were reviewed. All patients were treated with a combination of external radiotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy. Two hundred and nineteen patients (92%) received concurrent chemotherapy. All patients underwent pretreatment FDG-PET, and posttherapy FDG-PET was performed within 8-16 weeks of the completion of radiotherapy. Posttherapy FDG-PET results were categorized as complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), and progressive disease (PD). Failure patterns were categorized as none, isolated local failure (central pelvis ± pelvic lymph nodes), distant failure, or combined local plus distant failure. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients (38%) who had a recurrence, 22 had isolated local failures, and 69 had distant failures (49 distant failures and 20 combined local plus distant failures). Of the 173 patients with a CMR, 40 (23%) experienced treatment failure. All 25 patients with PD experienced treatment failure, which was distant in 24 patients (96%). Among the 40 patients with PMR, no failure has been observed for 14 patients (35%). Of the 26 failures within the PMR group, 15 (58%) were limited to the pelvis. Differences in the patterns of failure between the three groups (CMR, PMR, PD) were statistically significant (chi-square test; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of failures after definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer include distant failures, even in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy. PMR within the cervix or lymph nodes is more commonly associated with isolated local recurrence.
Authors: Alexander Lin; Sirui Ma; Farrokh Dehdashti; Stephanie Markovina; Julie Schwarz; Barry Siegel; Matthew Powell; Perry Grigsby Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2019-02-09 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Stephen R Bowen; William T C Yuh; Daniel S Hippe; Wei Wu; Savannah C Partridge; Saba Elias; Guang Jia; Zhibin Huang; George A Sandison; Dennis Nelson; Michael V Knopp; Simon S Lo; Paul E Kinahan; Nina A Mayr Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Elizabeth A Kidd; Maria Thomas; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Israel Zighelboim; Jason D Wright; Feng Gao; Ashley S Case; L Stewart Massad; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell; Premal H Thaker; Eric L Eisenhauer; David E Cohn; Fidel A Valea; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Lynne T Lippmann; Farrokh Dehdashti; Janet S Rader Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-04-13 Impact factor: 5.482