Literature DB >> 24559135

Comparative study of two chitin-active and two cellulose-active AA10-type lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases.

Zarah Forsberg1, Asmund Kjendseth Røhr, Sophanit Mekasha, K Kristoffer Andersson, Vincent G H Eijsink, Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad, Morten Sørlie.   

Abstract

Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs), found in family 9 (previously GH61), family 10 (previously CBM33), and the newly discovered family 11 of auxiliary activities (AA) in the carbohydrate-active enzyme classification system, are copper-dependent enzymes that oxidize sp(3)-carbons in recalcitrant polysaccharides such as chitin and cellulose in the presence of an external electron donor. In this study, we describe the activity of two AA10-type LPMOs whose activities have not been described before and we compare in total four different AA10-type LPMOs with the aim of finding possible correlations between their substrate specificities, sequences, and EPR signals. EPR spectra indicate that the electronic environment of the copper varies within the AA10 family even though amino acids directly interacting with the copper atom are identical in all four enzymes. This variation seems to be correlated to substrate specificity and is likely caused by sequence variation in areas that affect substrate binding geometry and/or by variation in a cluster of conserved aromatic residues likely involved in electron transfer. Interestingly, EPR signals for cellulose-active AA10 enzymes were similar to those previously observed for cellulose-active AA9 enzymes. Mutation of the conserved phenylalanine positioned in close proximity to the copper center in AA10-type LPMOs to Tyr (the corresponding residue in most AA9-type LPMOs) or Ala, led to complete or partial inactivation, respectively, while in both cases the ability to bind copper was maintained. Moreover, substrate binding affinity and degradation ability seemed hardly correlated, further emphasizing the crucial role of the active site configuration in determining LPMO functionality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24559135     DOI: 10.1021/bi5000433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  45 in total

1.  Structural and Functional Characterization of a Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenase with Broad Substrate Specificity.

Authors:  Anna S Borisova; Trine Isaksen; Maria Dimarogona; Abhishek A Kognole; Geir Mathiesen; Anikó Várnai; Åsmund K Røhr; Christina M Payne; Morten Sørlie; Mats Sandgren; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Physiological and Molecular Understanding of Bacterial Polysaccharide Monooxygenases.

Authors:  Marco Agostoni; John A Hangasky; Michael A Marletta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  The carbohydrate-binding module and linker of a modular lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase promote localized cellulose oxidation.

Authors:  Gaston Courtade; Zarah Forsberg; Ellinor B Heggset; Vincent G H Eijsink; Finn L Aachmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Structural and functional characterization of a conserved pair of bacterial cellulose-oxidizing lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases.

Authors:  Zarah Forsberg; Alasdair K Mackenzie; Morten Sørlie; Åsmund K Røhr; Ronny Helland; Andrew S Arvai; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Integration of bacterial lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases into designer cellulosomes promotes enhanced cellulose degradation.

Authors:  Yonathan Arfi; Melina Shamshoum; Ilana Rogachev; Yoav Peleg; Edward A Bayer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Insights into an unusual Auxiliary Activity 9 family member lacking the histidine brace motif of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases.

Authors:  Kristian E H Frandsen; Morten Tovborg; Christian I Jørgensen; Nikolaj Spodsberg; Marie-Noëlle Rosso; Glyn R Hemsworth; Elspeth F Garman; Geoffrey W Grime; Jens-Christian N Poulsen; Tanveer S Batth; Shingo Miyauchi; Anna Lipzen; Chris Daum; Igor V Grigoriev; Katja S Johansen; Bernard Henrissat; Jean-Guy Berrin; Leila Lo Leggio
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Structural determinants of bacterial lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase functionality.

Authors:  Zarah Forsberg; Bastien Bissaro; Jonathan Gullesen; Bjørn Dalhus; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Kinetic analysis of amino acid radicals formed in H2O2-driven CuI LPMO reoxidation implicates dominant homolytic reactivity.

Authors:  Stephen M Jones; Wesley J Transue; Katlyn K Meier; Bradley Kelemen; Edward I Solomon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Engineering chitinolytic activity into a cellulose-active lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase provides insights into substrate specificity.

Authors:  Marianne Slang Jensen; Geir Klinkenberg; Bastien Bissaro; Piotr Chylenski; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Hans Fredrik Kvitvang; Guro Kruge Nærdal; Håvard Sletta; Zarah Forsberg; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Heterogeneity in the Histidine-brace Copper Coordination Sphere in Auxiliary Activity Family 10 (AA10) Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenases.

Authors:  Amanda K Chaplin; Michael T Wilson; Michael A Hough; Dimitri A Svistunenko; Glyn R Hemsworth; Paul H Walton; Erik Vijgenboom; Jonathan A R Worrall
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.