W L Tan1, W Y Huang1, B Yin1, J Xiong2, J S Wu3, D Y Geng4. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (W.L.T., W.Y.H., B.Y., D.Y.G.). 2. Neuropathology (J.S.X.). 3. Neurosurgery (J.W.), Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China. 4. From the Departments of Radiology (W.L.T., W.Y.H., B.Y., D.Y.G.) gengdy@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: IDH1 mutational status probably plays an important role in the predictive response for patients with astroglioma. This study explores whether DTI metrics are able to noninvasively detect IDH1 status in astrogliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DTI data of 112 patients with pathologically proven astroglioma (including 25, 12, and 10 cases with IDH1 mutation and 11, 11, and 43 cases without mutation in grades II, III, and IV, respectively) were retrospectively reviewed. The maximal fractional anisotropy, minimal ADC, ratio of maximal fractional anisotropy, and ratio of minimal ADC in the tumor body were measured. In the same World Health Organization grading, the imaging parameters of patients with and without IDH1 R132H mutation were compared by means of optimal metrics for detecting mutations. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The maximal fractional anisotropy and ratio of maximal fractional anisotropy values had statistical significance between patients with IDH1 R132H mutation and those without mutation in astrogliomas of grades II and III. The areas under the curve for maximal fractional anisotropy and ratio of maximal fractional anisotropy were both 0.92 in grade II and 0.80 and 0.82 in grade III. The minimal ADC value and ratio of minimal ADC value also demonstrated statistical significance between patients with mutation and those without mutation in all astroglioma grades. The areas under the curve for minimal ADC were 0.94 (II), 0.76 (III), and 0.66 (IV), and the areas under the curve for ratio of minimal ADC were 0.93 (II), 0.83 (III), and 0.70 (IV). CONCLUSIONS: Fractional anisotropy and ADC from DTI can noninvasively detect IDH1 R132H mutation in astrogliomas.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:IDH1 mutational status probably plays an important role in the predictive response for patients with astroglioma. This study explores whether DTI metrics are able to noninvasively detect IDH1 status in astrogliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DTI data of 112 patients with pathologically proven astroglioma (including 25, 12, and 10 cases with IDH1 mutation and 11, 11, and 43 cases without mutation in grades II, III, and IV, respectively) were retrospectively reviewed. The maximal fractional anisotropy, minimal ADC, ratio of maximal fractional anisotropy, and ratio of minimal ADC in the tumor body were measured. In the same World Health Organization grading, the imaging parameters of patients with and without IDH1R132H mutation were compared by means of optimal metrics for detecting mutations. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The maximal fractional anisotropy and ratio of maximal fractional anisotropy values had statistical significance between patients with IDH1R132H mutation and those without mutation in astrogliomas of grades II and III. The areas under the curve for maximal fractional anisotropy and ratio of maximal fractional anisotropy were both 0.92 in grade II and 0.80 and 0.82 in grade III. The minimal ADC value and ratio of minimal ADC value also demonstrated statistical significance between patients with mutation and those without mutation in all astroglioma grades. The areas under the curve for minimal ADC were 0.94 (II), 0.76 (III), and 0.66 (IV), and the areas under the curve for ratio of minimal ADC were 0.93 (II), 0.83 (III), and 0.70 (IV). CONCLUSIONS: Fractional anisotropy and ADC from DTI can noninvasively detect IDH1R132H mutation in astrogliomas.
Authors: Delphine Loussouarn; Anne-Gaëlle Le Loupp; Jean-Sébastien Frenel; François Leclair; Andreas Von Deimling; Maud Aumont; Stéphane Martin; Mario Campone; Marc G Denis Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Catherine L Nutt; D R Mani; Rebecca A Betensky; Pablo Tamayo; J Gregory Cairncross; Christine Ladd; Ute Pohl; Christian Hartmann; Margaret E McLaughlin; Tracy T Batchelor; Peter M Black; Andreas von Deimling; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; David N Louis Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Inas S Khayal; Scott R Vandenberg; Kenneth J Smith; Colleen P Cloyd; Susan M Chang; Soonmee Cha; Sarah J Nelson; Tracy R McKnight Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Lenny Dang; David W White; Stefan Gross; Bryson D Bennett; Mark A Bittinger; Edward M Driggers; Valeria R Fantin; Hyun Gyung Jang; Shengfang Jin; Marie C Keenan; Kevin M Marks; Robert M Prins; Patrick S Ward; Katharine E Yen; Linda M Liau; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Lewis C Cantley; Craig B Thompson; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Shinsan M Su Journal: Nature Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler Journal: Science Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: David Capper; Matthias Simon; Claus-Dieter Langhans; Jürgen G Okun; Jörg C Tonn; Michael Weller; Andreas von Deimling; Christian Hartmann Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 7.316
Authors: David N Louis; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Webster K Cavenee; Peter C Burger; Anne Jouvet; Bernd W Scheithauer; Paul Kleihues Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Min Kyoung Lee; Ji Eun Park; Youngheun Jo; Seo Young Park; Sang Joon Kim; Ho Sung Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-08-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Matthew D Wood; Byung Se Choi; Marc C Mabray; Nicholas A Butowski; Tarik Tihan; Soonmee Cha Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: S C Thust; J A Maynard; M Benenati; S J Wastling; L Mancini; Z Jaunmuktane; S Brandner; H R Jäger Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.825