Tingting Liu1, Guang Cheng2, Xiaowei Kang1, Yibin Xi1, Yuanqiang Zhu1, Kai Wang2, Chao Sun3, Jing Ye3, Ping Li4, Hong Yin5. 1. Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. 3. Department of Pathology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Xi'an Mental Health Center, No. 15 Yanying Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China. lipinghao2011@163.com. 5. Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China. yinhong@fmmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To noninvasively evaluate the value of three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (3D pCASL) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in diffuse gliomas grading as well as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 mutation status. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with pathologically confirmed diffuse gliomas with preoperative 3D pCASL and DWI were enrolled in this study. The Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to evaluate differences in parameters of DWI and 3D pCASL between low and high grade as well as between mutant and wild-type IDH1 diffuse gliomas; receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance. Subsequently, a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent parameters. Besides, Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to examine the differences among grades II, III, and IV diffuse gliomas. RESULTS: All parameters but CBFmean showed significant differences between low- and high-grade diffuse gliomas. In ROC analysis, the AUC of CBFmax, rCBFmean, rCBFmax, ADCmean, and ADCmin were 0.701, 0.730, 0.746, 0.810, and 0.856 respectively. Only the value of ADCmin was identified as the independent parameter in the differentiation of low- from high-grade diffuse gliomas. All parameters but CBFmean showed significant differences among the three grades. And the values of CBFmean, CBFmax, rCBFmean, and ADCmean showed significant differences between mutant and wild-type IDH1 in grade II-III astrocytoma. CONCLUSION: Both 3D pCASL and DWI could be useful tools for distinguishing low- from high-grade diffuse gliomas and have the potential to differentiate different IDH1 mutation statuses of astrocytoma.
PURPOSE: To noninvasively evaluate the value of three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (3D pCASL) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in diffuse gliomas grading as well as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 mutation status. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with pathologically confirmed diffuse gliomas with preoperative 3D pCASL and DWI were enrolled in this study. The Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to evaluate differences in parameters of DWI and 3D pCASL between low and high grade as well as between mutant and wild-type IDH1 diffuse gliomas; receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance. Subsequently, a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent parameters. Besides, Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to examine the differences among grades II, III, and IV diffuse gliomas. RESULTS: All parameters but CBFmean showed significant differences between low- and high-grade diffuse gliomas. In ROC analysis, the AUC of CBFmax, rCBFmean, rCBFmax, ADCmean, and ADCmin were 0.701, 0.730, 0.746, 0.810, and 0.856 respectively. Only the value of ADCmin was identified as the independent parameter in the differentiation of low- from high-grade diffuse gliomas. All parameters but CBFmean showed significant differences among the three grades. And the values of CBFmean, CBFmax, rCBFmean, and ADCmean showed significant differences between mutant and wild-type IDH1 in grade II-III astrocytoma. CONCLUSION: Both 3D pCASL and DWI could be useful tools for distinguishing low- from high-grade diffuse gliomas and have the potential to differentiate different IDH1 mutation statuses of astrocytoma.
Authors: Myriam M Chaumeil; Peder E Z Larson; Hikari A I Yoshihara; Olivia M Danforth; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson; Russell O Pieper; Joanna J Phillips; Sabrina M Ronen Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Michael H Lev; Yelda Ozsunar; John W Henson; Amjad A Rasheed; Glenn D Barest; Griffith R Harsh; Markus M Fitzek; E Antonio Chiocca; James D Rabinov; Andrew N Csavoy; Bruce R Rosen; Fred H Hochberg; Pamela W Schaefer; R Gilberto Gonzalez Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Fusun Baumann; Petra Leukel; Anett Doerfelt; Christoph P Beier; Katja Dettmer; Peter J Oefner; Michael Kastenberger; Marina Kreutz; Thomas Nickl-Jockschat; Ulrich Bogdahn; Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff; Peter Hau Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Koichi Ichimura; Danita M Pearson; Sylvia Kocialkowski; L Magnus Bäcklund; Raymond Chan; David T W Jones; V Peter Collins Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Artem I Batalov; Natalia E Zakharova; Ivan V Chekhonin; Eduard L Pogosbekyan; Anna V Sudarikova; Sergey A Goryainov; Anna A Shulgina; Artem Yu Belyaev; Dmirti Yu Usachev; Igor N Pronin Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-06-12
Authors: Minjae Kim; So Yeong Jung; Ji Eun Park; Yeongheun Jo; Seo Young Park; Soo Jung Nam; Jeong Hoon Kim; Ho Sung Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S C Thust; J A Maynard; M Benenati; S J Wastling; L Mancini; Z Jaunmuktane; S Brandner; H R Jäger Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Patrick W Hales; Felice d'Arco; Jessica Cooper; Josef Pfeuffer; Darren Hargrave; Kshitij Mankad; Chris Clark Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 4.881