Z Xing1, X Yang1, D She1, Y Lin1, Y Zhang1, D Cao2. 1. From the Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, P.R. China. 2. From the Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, P.R. China. dairongcao@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) has been shown to have both diagnostic and prognostic implications in gliomas. The purpose of this study was to examine whether DWI and DSC-PWI combined with conventional MR imaging could noninvasively predict IDH mutational status in World Health Organization grade II and III astrocytomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed DWI, DSC-PWI, and conventional MR imaging in 42 patients with World Health Organization grade II and III astrocytomas. Minimum ADC, relative ADC, and relative maximum CBV values were compared between IDH-mutant and wild-type tumors by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression were used to assess their diagnostic performances. RESULTS: Minimum ADC and relative ADC were significantly higher in IDH-mutated grade II and III astrocytomas than in IDH wild-type tumors (P < .05). Minimum ADC with the cutoff value of ≥1.01 × 10-3 mm2/s could differentiate the mutational status with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 76.9%, 82.6%, 91.2%, and 60.5%, respectively. The threshold value of <2.35 for relative maximum CBV in the prediction of IDH mutation provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100.0%, 60.9%, 85.6%, and 100.0%, respectively. A combination of DWI, DSC-PWI, and conventional MR imaging for the identification of IDH mutations resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 92.3%, 91.3%, 96.1%, and 83.6%. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of conventional MR imaging, DWI, and DSC-PWI techniques produces a high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting IDH mutations in grade II and III astrocytomas. The strategy of using advanced, semiquantitative MR imaging techniques may provide an important, noninvasive, surrogate marker that should be studied further in larger, prospective trials.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) has been shown to have both diagnostic and prognostic implications in gliomas. The purpose of this study was to examine whether DWI and DSC-PWI combined with conventional MR imaging could noninvasively predict IDH mutational status in World Health Organization grade II and III astrocytomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed DWI, DSC-PWI, and conventional MR imaging in 42 patients with World Health Organization grade II and III astrocytomas. Minimum ADC, relative ADC, and relative maximum CBV values were compared between IDH-mutant and wild-type tumors by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression were used to assess their diagnostic performances. RESULTS: Minimum ADC and relative ADC were significantly higher in IDH-mutated grade II and III astrocytomas than in IDH wild-type tumors (P < .05). Minimum ADC with the cutoff value of ≥1.01 × 10-3 mm2/s could differentiate the mutational status with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 76.9%, 82.6%, 91.2%, and 60.5%, respectively. The threshold value of <2.35 for relative maximum CBV in the prediction of IDH mutation provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100.0%, 60.9%, 85.6%, and 100.0%, respectively. A combination of DWI, DSC-PWI, and conventional MR imaging for the identification of IDH mutations resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 92.3%, 91.3%, 96.1%, and 83.6%. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of conventional MR imaging, DWI, and DSC-PWI techniques produces a high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting IDH mutations in grade II and III astrocytomas. The strategy of using advanced, semiquantitative MR imaging techniques may provide an important, noninvasive, surrogate marker that should be studied further in larger, prospective trials.
Authors: Inas S Khayal; Scott R Vandenberg; Kenneth J Smith; Colleen P Cloyd; Susan M Chang; Soonmee Cha; Sarah J Nelson; Tracy R McKnight Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: J A Carrillo; A Lai; P L Nghiemphu; H J Kim; H S Phillips; S Kharbanda; P Moftakhar; S Lalaezari; W Yong; B M Ellingson; T F Cloughesy; W B Pope Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Dan Rohle; Janeta Popovici-Muller; Nicolaos Palaskas; Sevin Turcan; Christian Grommes; Carl Campos; Jennifer Tsoi; Owen Clark; Barbara Oldrini; Evangelia Komisopoulou; Kaiko Kunii; Alicia Pedraza; Stefanie Schalm; Lee Silverman; Alexandra Miller; Fang Wang; Hua Yang; Yue Chen; Andrew Kernytsky; Marc K Rosenblum; Wei Liu; Scott A Biller; Shinsan M Su; Cameron W Brennan; Timothy A Chan; Thomas G Graeber; Katharine E Yen; Ingo K Mellinghoff Journal: Science Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Christian Hartmann; Jochen Meyer; Jörg Balss; David Capper; Wolf Mueller; Arne Christians; Jörg Felsberg; Marietta Wolter; Christian Mawrin; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; Judith W M Jeuken; Peter Wesseling; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Min Kyoung Lee; Ji Eun Park; Youngheun Jo; Seo Young Park; Sang Joon Kim; Ho Sung Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-08-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: E Aliotta; H Nourzadeh; P P Batchala; D Schiff; M B Lopes; J T Druzgal; S Mukherjee; S H Patel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Aliaksandra Shymanskaya; Wieland A Worthoff; Gabriele Stoffels; Johannes Lindemeyer; Bernd Neumaier; Philipp Lohmann; Norbert Galldiks; Karl-Josef Langen; N Jon Shah Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Melissa A Prah; Mona M Al-Gizawiy; Wade M Mueller; Elizabeth J Cochran; Raymond G Hoffmann; Jennifer M Connelly; Kathleen M Schmainda Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 4.130