Chae Jung Park1, Yoon Seong Choi2, Yae Won Park3, Sung Soo Ahn1, Seok-Gu Kang4, Jong-Hee Chang4, Se Hoon Kim5, Seung-Koo Lee1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. yoonseong.choi07@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. 5. Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) radiomics with machine learning improves the prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status of lower-grade gliomas beyond radiomic features from conventional MRI and DTI histogram parameters. METHODS: A total of 168 patients with pathologically confirmed lower-grade gliomas were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 158 and 253 radiomic features were extracted from DTI (DTI radiomics) and conventional MRI (T1-weighted image with contrast enhancement, T2-weighted image, and FLAIR [conventional radiomics]), respectively. The random forest models for predicting IDH status were trained with variable combinations as follows: (1) DTI radiomics, (2) conventional radiomics, (3) conventional radiomics + DTI radiomics, and (4) conventional radiomics + DTI histogram. The models were validated with nested cross-validation. The predictive performances of those models were compared by using area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic analysis, and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. RESULTS: Adding DTI radiomics to conventional radiomics significantly improved the accuracy of IDH status subtyping (AUC, 0.900 [95% CI, 0.855-0.945], p = 0.006), whereas adding DTI histogram parameters yielded nonsignificant trend toward improvement (0.869 [95% CI, 0.816-0.922], p = 0.150) compared with the model with conventional radiomics alone (0.835 [95% CI, 0.773-0.896]). The performance of the model consisting of both DTI and conventional radiomics was significantly superior than that of model consisting of both DTI histogram parameters and conventional radiomics (0.900 vs 0.869, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: DTI radiomics with machine learning can help improve the subtyping of IDH status beyond conventional radiomics and DTI histogram parameters in patients with lower-grade gliomas.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) radiomics with machine learning improves the prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status of lower-grade gliomas beyond radiomic features from conventional MRI and DTI histogram parameters. METHODS: A total of 168 patients with pathologically confirmed lower-grade gliomas were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 158 and 253 radiomic features were extracted from DTI (DTI radiomics) and conventional MRI (T1-weighted image with contrast enhancement, T2-weighted image, and FLAIR [conventional radiomics]), respectively. The random forest models for predicting IDH status were trained with variable combinations as follows: (1) DTI radiomics, (2) conventional radiomics, (3) conventional radiomics + DTI radiomics, and (4) conventional radiomics + DTI histogram. The models were validated with nested cross-validation. The predictive performances of those models were compared by using area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic analysis, and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. RESULTS: Adding DTI radiomics to conventional radiomics significantly improved the accuracy of IDH status subtyping (AUC, 0.900 [95% CI, 0.855-0.945], p = 0.006), whereas adding DTI histogram parameters yielded nonsignificant trend toward improvement (0.869 [95% CI, 0.816-0.922], p = 0.150) compared with the model with conventional radiomics alone (0.835 [95% CI, 0.773-0.896]). The performance of the model consisting of both DTI and conventional radiomics was significantly superior than that of model consisting of both DTI histogram parameters and conventional radiomics (0.900 vs 0.869, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: DTI radiomics with machine learning can help improve the subtyping of IDH status beyond conventional radiomics and DTI histogram parameters in patients with lower-grade gliomas.
Authors: Daniel J Brat; Roel G W Verhaak; Kenneth D Aldape; W K Alfred Yung; Sofie R Salama; Lee A D Cooper; Esther Rheinbay; C Ryan Miller; Mark Vitucci; Olena Morozova; A Gordon Robertson; Houtan Noushmehr; Peter W Laird; Andrew D Cherniack; Rehan Akbani; Jason T Huse; Giovanni Ciriello; Laila M Poisson; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Mitchel S Berger; Cameron Brennan; Rivka R Colen; Howard Colman; Adam E Flanders; Caterina Giannini; Mia Grifford; Antonio Iavarone; Rajan Jain; Isaac Joseph; Jaegil Kim; Katayoon Kasaian; Tom Mikkelsen; Bradley A Murray; Brian Patrick O'Neill; Lior Pachter; Donald W Parsons; Carrie Sougnez; Erik P Sulman; Scott R Vandenberg; Erwin G Van Meir; Andreas von Deimling; Hailei Zhang; Daniel Crain; Kevin Lau; David Mallery; Scott Morris; Joseph Paulauskis; Robert Penny; Troy Shelton; Mark Sherman; Peggy Yena; Aaron Black; Jay Bowen; Katie Dicostanzo; Julie Gastier-Foster; Kristen M Leraas; Tara M Lichtenberg; Christopher R Pierson; Nilsa C Ramirez; Cynthia Taylor; Stephanie Weaver; Lisa Wise; Erik Zmuda; Tanja Davidsen; John A Demchok; Greg Eley; Martin L Ferguson; Carolyn M Hutter; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Bradley A Ozenberger; Margi Sheth; Heidi J Sofia; Roy Tarnuzzer; Zhining Wang; Liming Yang; Jean Claude Zenklusen; Brenda Ayala; Julien Baboud; Sudha Chudamani; Mark A Jensen; Jia Liu; Todd Pihl; Rohini Raman; Yunhu Wan; Ye Wu; Adrian Ally; J Todd Auman; Miruna Balasundaram; Saianand Balu; Stephen B Baylin; Rameen Beroukhim; Moiz S Bootwalla; Reanne Bowlby; Christopher A Bristow; Denise Brooks; Yaron Butterfield; Rebecca Carlsen; Scott Carter; Lynda Chin; Andy Chu; Eric Chuah; Kristian Cibulskis; Amanda Clarke; Simon G Coetzee; Noreen Dhalla; Tim Fennell; Sheila Fisher; Stacey Gabriel; Gad Getz; Richard Gibbs; Ranabir Guin; Angela Hadjipanayis; D Neil Hayes; Toshinori Hinoue; Katherine Hoadley; Robert A Holt; Alan P Hoyle; Stuart R Jefferys; Steven Jones; Corbin D Jones; Raju Kucherlapati; Phillip H Lai; Eric Lander; Semin Lee; Lee Lichtenstein; Yussanne Ma; Dennis T Maglinte; Harshad S Mahadeshwar; Marco A Marra; Michael Mayo; Shaowu Meng; Matthew L Meyerson; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Richard A Moore; Lisle E Mose; Andrew J Mungall; Angeliki Pantazi; Michael Parfenov; Peter J Park; Joel S Parker; Charles M Perou; Alexei Protopopov; Xiaojia Ren; Jeffrey Roach; Thaís S Sabedot; Jacqueline Schein; Steven E Schumacher; Jonathan G Seidman; Sahil Seth; Hui Shen; Janae V Simons; Payal Sipahimalani; Matthew G Soloway; Xingzhi Song; Huandong Sun; Barbara Tabak; Angela Tam; Donghui Tan; Jiabin Tang; Nina Thiessen; Timothy Triche; David J Van Den Berg; Umadevi Veluvolu; Scot Waring; Daniel J Weisenberger; Matthew D Wilkerson; Tina Wong; Junyuan Wu; Liu Xi; Andrew W Xu; Lixing Yang; Travis I Zack; Jianhua Zhang; B Arman Aksoy; Harindra Arachchi; Chris Benz; Brady Bernard; Daniel Carlin; Juok Cho; Daniel DiCara; Scott Frazer; Gregory N Fuller; JianJiong Gao; Nils Gehlenborg; David Haussler; David I Heiman; Lisa Iype; Anders Jacobsen; Zhenlin Ju; Sol Katzman; Hoon Kim; Theo Knijnenburg; Richard Bailey Kreisberg; Michael S Lawrence; William Lee; Kalle Leinonen; Pei Lin; Shiyun Ling; Wenbin Liu; Yingchun Liu; Yuexin Liu; Yiling Lu; Gordon Mills; Sam Ng; Michael S Noble; Evan Paull; Arvind Rao; Sheila Reynolds; Gordon Saksena; Zack Sanborn; Chris Sander; Nikolaus Schultz; Yasin Senbabaoglu; Ronglai Shen; Ilya Shmulevich; Rileen Sinha; Josh Stuart; S Onur Sumer; Yichao Sun; Natalie Tasman; Barry S Taylor; Doug Voet; Nils Weinhold; John N Weinstein; Da Yang; Kosuke Yoshihara; Siyuan Zheng; Wei Zhang; Lihua Zou; Ty Abel; Sara Sadeghi; Mark L Cohen; Jenny Eschbacher; Eyas M Hattab; Aditya Raghunathan; Matthew J Schniederjan; Dina Aziz; Gene Barnett; Wendi Barrett; Darell D Bigner; Lori Boice; Cathy Brewer; Chiara Calatozzolo; Benito Campos; Carlos Gilberto Carlotti; Timothy A Chan; Lucia Cuppini; Erin Curley; Stefania Cuzzubbo; Karen Devine; Francesco DiMeco; Rebecca Duell; J Bradley Elder; Ashley Fehrenbach; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; Jordonna Fulop; Johanna Gardner; Beth Hermes; Christel Herold-Mende; Christine Jungk; Ady Kendler; Norman L Lehman; Eric Lipp; Ouida Liu; Randy Mandt; Mary McGraw; Roger Mclendon; Christopher McPherson; Luciano Neder; Phuong Nguyen; Ardene Noss; Raffaele Nunziata; Quinn T Ostrom; Cheryl Palmer; Alessandro Perin; Bianca Pollo; Alexander Potapov; Olga Potapova; W Kimryn Rathmell; Daniil Rotin; Lisa Scarpace; Cathy Schilero; Kelly Senecal; Kristen Shimmel; Vsevolod Shurkhay; Suzanne Sifri; Rosy Singh; Andrew E Sloan; Kathy Smolenski; Susan M Staugaitis; Ruth Steele; Leigh Thorne; Daniela P C Tirapelli; Andreas Unterberg; Mahitha Vallurupalli; Yun Wang; Ronald Warnick; Felicia Williams; Yingli Wolinsky; Sue Bell; Mara Rosenberg; Chip Stewart; Franklin Huang; Jonna L Grimsby; Amie J Radenbaugh; Jianan Zhang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Whitney B Pope; Xin Joe Qiao; Hyun J Kim; Albert Lai; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Xi Xue; Benjamin M Ellingson; David Schiff; Dawit Aregawi; Soonmee Cha; Vinay K Puduvalli; Jing Wu; Wai-Kwan A Yung; Geoffrey S Young; James Vredenburgh; Dan Barboriak; Lauren E Abrey; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Nina A Paleologos; Patricia Lada; Michael Prados; Jonathan Goldin; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-03-18 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: J Cha; S T Kim; H-J Kim; B-J Kim; Y K Kim; J Y Lee; P Jeon; K H Kim; D-S Kong; D-H Nam Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Philipp Kickingereder; Michael Götz; John Muschelli; Antje Wick; Ulf Neuberger; Russell T Shinohara; Martin Sill; Martha Nowosielski; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Alexander Radbruch; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Klaus H Maier-Hein; David Bonekamp Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Amir Zolal; Tareq A Juratli; Jennifer Linn; Dino Podlesek; Kerim Hakan Sitoci Ficici; Hagen H Kitzler; Gabriele Schackert; Stephan B Sobottka; Bernhard Rieger; Dietmar Krex Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-01-30 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Evi J van Kempen; Max Post; Manoj Mannil; Benno Kusters; Mark Ter Laan; Frederick J A Meijer; Dylan J H A Henssen Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Soopil Kim; Yae Won Park; Sang Hyun Park; Sung Soo Ahn; Jong Hee Chang; Se Hoon Kim; Seung Koo Lee Journal: Brain Tumor Res Treat Date: 2020-04