Literature DB >> 27096454

SOME FACTORS IN THE COMPETITION OR ANTAGONISM AMONG BACTERIA, ALGAE, AND AQUATIC WEEDS.

G P Filzgerald1.   

Abstract

Field observations of changes in the populations of aquatic weeds and phytoplankton have confirmed that aquatic weeds have antagonistic activity toward phytoplankton. Nutritional studies in the laboratory indicate that cultures of the aquatic weeds, Myriophyllum sp., Ceratophyllum sp., and duckweed (Lemma minor L.); liquid cultures of barley (Hordeum vulgare L., Dickson variety); and cultures of the filamentous green algae, Cladophora sp. and Pithophora oedogonium (Mont.) Withrock, will remain relatively free of epiphytes or competing phytoplankton if the cultures are nitrogen-limited. Field observations of Cladophora sp. have confirmed that the growth of epiphytes on the Cladophora is related to conditions of surplus available nitrogen compounds. It is proposed that this antagonistic activity may be due to a "nitrogen sink" effect in which the aquatic weeds or filamentous green algae prevent the growth of contaminating algae by competition for the limited nitrogen compounds available. However, the presence of bacteria-sized organisms which have selective toxicity to certain algae indicates that perhaps multiple factors exist. Discussed are the ecological implications of associations of certain algae with bacteria that have selective toxicities for other species of algae under certain environmental conditions such as nitrogen-limited growth.

Entities:  

Year:  1969        PMID: 27096454     DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.1969.tb02625.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phycol        ISSN: 0022-3646            Impact factor:   2.923


  9 in total

1.  Hydrodynamic constraints on evolution of chemically mediated interactions between aquatic organisms in unidirectional flows.

Authors:  W K Dodds
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Community interactions between the filamentous alga Cladophora glomerata (L.) Kuetzing, its epiphytes, and epiphyte grazers.

Authors:  Walter K Dodds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Comparative proteomics exploring the molecular mechanism of eutrophic water purification using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes).

Authors:  Xiong Li; Houcheng Xi; Xudong Sun; Yunqiang Yang; Shihai Yang; Yanli Zhou; Xinmao Zhou; Yongping Yang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Some factors effecting algal densities in a eutrophic farmland stream.

Authors:  James W Moore
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Evaluation of a combined macrophyte-epiphyte bioassay for assessing nutrient enrichment in the Portneuf River, Idaho, USA.

Authors:  Andrew M Ray; Christopher A Mebane; Flint Raben; Kathryn M Irvine; Amy M Marcarelli
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  In vitro algal growth inhibition by phytotoxins ofTypha latifolia L.

Authors:  G Aliotta; M D Greca; P Monaco; G Pinto; A Pollio; L Previtera
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Effect of ent-labdane diterpenes from Potamogetonaceae on Selenastrum capricornutum and other aquatic organisms.

Authors:  Tiziana Cangiano; Marina Dellagreca; Antonio Fiorentino; Marina Isidori; Pietro Monaco; Armando Zarrelli
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Chemical constituents of the aquatic plant Schoenoplectus lacustris: evaluation of phytotoxic effects on the green alga Selenastrum capricornutum.

Authors:  Brigida D'Abrosca; Marina Dellagreca; Antonio Fiorentino; Marina Isidori; Pietro Monaco; Severina Pacifico
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-02-26       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Quorum sensing is a language of chemical signals and plays an ecological role in algal-bacterial interactions.

Authors:  Jin Zhou; Yihua Lyu; Mindy Richlen; Donald M Anderson; Zhonghua Cai
Journal:  CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.188

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.