Literature DB >> 19012884

Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use.

Thérèse Collins1, Tobias Schicke, Brigitte Röder.   

Abstract

The preparation of eye or hand movements enhances visual perception at the upcoming movement end position. The spatial location of this influence of action on perception could be determined either by goal selection or by motor planning. We employed a tool use task to dissociate these two alternatives. The instructed goal location was a visual target to which participants pointed with the tip of a triangular hand-held tool. The motor endpoint was defined by the final fingertip position necessary to bring the tool tip onto the goal. We tested perceptual performance at both locations (tool tip endpoint, motor endpoint) with a visual discrimination task. Discrimination performance was enhanced in parallel at both spatial locations, but not at nearby and intermediate locations, suggesting that both action goal selection and motor planning contribute to visual perception. In addition, our results challenge the widely held view that tools extend the body schema and suggest instead that tool use enhances perception at those precise locations which are most relevant during tool action: the body part used to manipulate the tool, and the active tool tip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19012884     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  18 in total

1.  Moving further moves things further away in visual perception: position-based movement planning affects distance judgments.

Authors:  Wladimir Kirsch; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Allocation of attention for dissociated visual and motor goals.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Patrick Bédard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The contribution of cognitive, kinematic, and dynamic factors to anticipatory grasp selection.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Segment interdependency and gaze anchoring during manual two-segment sequences.

Authors:  Miya K Rand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Eye-hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation: effects of hemispace and joint coordination.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Sebastian Rentsch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of cue-response mapping in motorvisual impairment and facilitation: evidence for different roles of action planning and action control in motorvisual dual-task priming.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Visual target selection and motor planning define attentional enhancement at perceptual processing stages.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Tobias Heed; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Are tools truly incorporated as an extension of the body representation?: Assessing the evidence for tool embodiment.

Authors:  Joshua D Bell; Kristen L Macuga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-23

10.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.