Benjamin N Breyer1, Suzanne Phelan2, Patricia E Hogan3, Raymond C Rosen4, Abbas E Kitabchi5, Rena R Wing6, Jeanette S Brown7. 1. Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: bbreyer@urology.ucsf.edu. 2. Kinesiology Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California. 3. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 4. New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 6. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Medical School and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 7. Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences; Urology and Epidemiology, UCSF Women's Health Clinical Research Center, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We determined the effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on the prevalence, incidence and resolution of bothersome nocturia, increased daytime urinary voiding and urinary incontinence in overweight/obese men with type 2 diabetes after 1 year in the Look AHEAD trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A subset of male Look AHEAD participants was selected for this secondary data analysis. Overall 1,910 men with an average (mean ± SD) age of 59.9 ± 6.7 years and body mass index of 35.2 ± 5.5 kg/m(2) were randomized to an intensive lifestyle intervention or diabetes support and education group. All participants self-reported information regarding incontinence, nocturia and daytime urinary voiding at entry and 1 year. RESULTS: After 1 year the intensive lifestyle intervention group lost significantly more weight than the diabetes support and education group (9.4% ± 7.0% vs 0.7% ± 4.5%, respectively; p <0.001). The odds of prevalent urinary incontinence at 1 year were reduced by 38% in the intensive lifestyle intervention group compared to the diabetes support and education group. The prevalence of urinary incontinence decreased from 11.3% to 9.0% in the intensive lifestyle intervention group and increased from 9.7% to 11.6% in the diabetes support and education group. The intensive lifestyle intervention group also had increased odds of urinary incontinence resolving (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.04-3.59, p = 0.04 and 56.0% vs 40.7%, p = 0.03) and trend toward reduced odds of new onset, incident urinary incontinence (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42-1.02, p = 0.06) compared with the diabetes support and education arm. In contrast, no differences between intensive lifestyle intervention and diabetes support and education were seen at 1 year for frequency of nocturia or frequency of daytime voiding. CONCLUSIONS:Intensive lifestyle intervention should be considered for the treatment of urinary incontinence in overweight/obese men with type 2 diabetes.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: We determined the effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on the prevalence, incidence and resolution of bothersome nocturia, increased daytime urinary voiding and urinary incontinence in overweight/obesemen with type 2 diabetes after 1 year in the Look AHEAD trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A subset of male Look AHEAD participants was selected for this secondary data analysis. Overall 1,910 men with an average (mean ± SD) age of 59.9 ± 6.7 years and body mass index of 35.2 ± 5.5 kg/m(2) were randomized to an intensive lifestyle intervention or diabetes support and education group. All participants self-reported information regarding incontinence, nocturia and daytime urinary voiding at entry and 1 year. RESULTS: After 1 year the intensive lifestyle intervention group lost significantly more weight than the diabetes support and education group (9.4% ± 7.0% vs 0.7% ± 4.5%, respectively; p <0.001). The odds of prevalent urinary incontinence at 1 year were reduced by 38% in the intensive lifestyle intervention group compared to the diabetes support and education group. The prevalence of urinary incontinence decreased from 11.3% to 9.0% in the intensive lifestyle intervention group and increased from 9.7% to 11.6% in the diabetes support and education group. The intensive lifestyle intervention group also had increased odds of urinary incontinence resolving (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.04-3.59, p = 0.04 and 56.0% vs 40.7%, p = 0.03) and trend toward reduced odds of new onset, incident urinary incontinence (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42-1.02, p = 0.06) compared with the diabetes support and education arm. In contrast, no differences between intensive lifestyle intervention and diabetes support and education were seen at 1 year for frequency of nocturia or frequency of daytime voiding. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive lifestyle intervention should be considered for the treatment of urinary incontinence in overweight/obesemen with type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Karin S Coyne; Chris Payne; Samir K Bhattacharyya; Dennis A Revicki; Christine Thompson; Ron Corey; Timothy L Hunt Journal: Value Health Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Donna H Ryan; Mark A Espeland; Gary D Foster; Steven M Haffner; Van S Hubbard; Karen C Johnson; Steven E Kahn; William C Knowler; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2003-10
Authors: Scott R Bauer; Barbara Grimes; Anne M Suskind; Peggy M Cawthon; Steven Cummings; Alison J Huang Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Leslee L Subak; Wendy C King; Steven H Belle; Jia-Yuh Chen; Anita P Courcoulas; Faith E Ebel; David R Flum; Saurabh Khandelwal; John R Pender; Sheila K Pierson; Walter J Pories; Kristine J Steffen; Gladys W Strain; Bruce M Wolfe; Alison J Huang Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 21.873