Leslee L Subak1, Wendy C King2, Steven H Belle3, Jia-Yuh Chen4, Anita P Courcoulas5, Faith E Ebel6, David R Flum7, Saurabh Khandelwal7, John R Pender8, Sheila K Pierson5, Walter J Pories8, Kristine J Steffen9, Gladys W Strain6, Bruce M Wolfe10, Alison J Huang11. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco3Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco4S. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania6Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. GI Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 7. Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle. 8. Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina. 9. Department of Neuroscience, Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks. 10. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. 11. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Among women and men with severe obesity, evidence for improvement in urinary incontinence beyond the first year after bariatric surgery-induced weight loss is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To examine change in urinary incontinence before and after bariatric surgery and to identify factors associated with improvement and remission among women and men in the first 3 years after bariatric surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery 2 is an observational cohort study at 10 US hospitals in 6 geographically diverse clinical centers. Participants were recruited between February 21, 2005, and February 17, 2009. Adults undergoing first-time bariatric surgical procedures as part of clinical care by participating surgeons between March 14, 2006, and April 24, 2009, were followed up for 3 years (through October 24, 2012). INTERVENTION: Participants undergoing bariatric surgery completed research assessments before the procedure and annually thereafter. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The frequency and type of urinary incontinence episodes in the past 3 months were assessed using a validated questionnaire. Prevalent urinary incontinence was defined as at least weekly urinary incontinence episodes, and remission was defined as change from prevalent urinary incontinence at baseline to less than weekly urinary incontinence episodes at follow-up. RESULTS: Of 2458 participants, 1987 (80.8%) completed baseline and follow-up assessments. At baseline, the median age was 47 years (age range, 18-78 years), the median body mass index was 46 kg/m2 (range, 34-94 kg/m2), and 1565 of 1987 (78.8%) were women. Urinary incontinence was more prevalent among women (49.3%; 95% CI, 46.9%-51.9%) than men (21.8%; 95% CI, 18.2%-26.1%) (P < .001). After a mean 1-year weight loss of 29.5% (95% CI, 29.0%-30.1%) in women and 27.0% (95% CI, 25.9%-28.6%) in men, year 1 urinary incontinence prevalence was significantly lower among women (18.3%; 95% CI, 16.4%-20.4%) and men (9.8%; 95% CI, 7.2%-13.4%) (P < .001 for all). The 3-year prevalence was higher than the 1-year prevalence for both sexes (24.8%; 95% CI, 21.8%-26.5% among women and 12.2%; 95% CI, 9.0%-16.4% among men) but was substantially lower than baseline (P < .001 for all). Weight loss was independently related to urinary incontinence remission (relative risk, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10 in women and 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13 in men) per 5% weight loss, as were younger age and the absence of a severe walking limitation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among women and men with severe obesity, bariatric surgery was associated with substantially reduced urinary incontinence over 3 years. Improvement in urinary incontinence may be an important benefit of bariatric surgery.
IMPORTANCE: Among women and men with severe obesity, evidence for improvement in urinary incontinence beyond the first year after bariatric surgery-induced weight loss is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To examine change in urinary incontinence before and after bariatric surgery and to identify factors associated with improvement and remission among women and men in the first 3 years after bariatric surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery 2 is an observational cohort study at 10 US hospitals in 6 geographically diverse clinical centers. Participants were recruited between February 21, 2005, and February 17, 2009. Adults undergoing first-time bariatric surgical procedures as part of clinical care by participating surgeons between March 14, 2006, and April 24, 2009, were followed up for 3 years (through October 24, 2012). INTERVENTION: Participants undergoing bariatric surgery completed research assessments before the procedure and annually thereafter. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The frequency and type of urinary incontinence episodes in the past 3 months were assessed using a validated questionnaire. Prevalent urinary incontinence was defined as at least weekly urinary incontinence episodes, and remission was defined as change from prevalent urinary incontinence at baseline to less than weekly urinary incontinence episodes at follow-up. RESULTS: Of 2458 participants, 1987 (80.8%) completed baseline and follow-up assessments. At baseline, the median age was 47 years (age range, 18-78 years), the median body mass index was 46 kg/m2 (range, 34-94 kg/m2), and 1565 of 1987 (78.8%) were women. Urinary incontinence was more prevalent among women (49.3%; 95% CI, 46.9%-51.9%) than men (21.8%; 95% CI, 18.2%-26.1%) (P < .001). After a mean 1-year weight loss of 29.5% (95% CI, 29.0%-30.1%) in women and 27.0% (95% CI, 25.9%-28.6%) in men, year 1 urinary incontinence prevalence was significantly lower among women (18.3%; 95% CI, 16.4%-20.4%) and men (9.8%; 95% CI, 7.2%-13.4%) (P < .001 for all). The 3-year prevalence was higher than the 1-year prevalence for both sexes (24.8%; 95% CI, 21.8%-26.5% among women and 12.2%; 95% CI, 9.0%-16.4% among men) but was substantially lower than baseline (P < .001 for all). Weight loss was independently related to urinary incontinence remission (relative risk, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10 in women and 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13 in men) per 5% weight loss, as were younger age and the absence of a severe walking limitation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among women and men with severe obesity, bariatric surgery was associated with substantially reduced urinary incontinence over 3 years. Improvement in urinary incontinence may be an important benefit of bariatric surgery.
Authors: Kim N Danforth; Mary K Townsend; Karen Lifford; Gary C Curhan; Neil M Resnick; Francine Grodstein Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: David H Thom; Stephen K van den Eeden; Arona I Ragins; Christina Wassel-Fyr; Eric Vittinghof; Leslee L Subak; Jeanette S Brown Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Holly E Richter; Kathryn L Burgio; Ronald H Clements; Patricia S Goode; David T Redden; R Edward Varner Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Michael L Ganz; Amy M Smalarz; Tracey L Krupski; Jennifer T Anger; Jim C Hu; Kim U Wittrup-Jensen; Chris L Pashos Journal: Urology Date: 2009-12-29 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Holly E Richter; C L Amundsen; S W Erickson; J E Jelovsek; Y Komesu; C Chermansky; H S Harvie; M Albo; D Myers; W T Gregory; D Wallace Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Stefany D Primeaux; Taniya de Silva; Tony H Tzeng; Monica C Chiang; Daniel S Hsia Journal: Rev Endocr Metab Disord Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Benjamin N Breyer; Jennifer M Creasman; Holly E Richter; Deborah Myers; Kathryn L Burgio; Rena R Wing; Delia Smith West; John W Kusek; Leslee L Subak Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-08-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Maurizio De Luca; Luigi Angrisani; Jacques Himpens; Luca Busetto; Nicola Scopinaro; Rudolf Weiner; Alberto Sartori; Christine Stier; Muffazal Lakdawala; Aparna G Bhasker; Henry Buchwald; John Dixon; Sonja Chiappetta; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Gema Frühbeck; David B Sarwer; Michel Suter; Emanuele Soricelli; Mattias Blüher; Ramon Vilallonga; Arya Sharma; Scott Shikora Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Camille P Vaughan; Alayne D Markland; Phillip P Smith; Kathryn L Burgio; George A Kuchel Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Scott R Bauer; Barbara Grimes; Anne M Suskind; Peggy M Cawthon; Steven Cummings; Alison J Huang Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 7.450