Literature DB >> 24532129

Utility of additional CT examinations driven by completion of a standard trauma imaging protocol in patients transferred for minor trauma.

Matthew T Heller1, Emanuel Kanal, Omar Almusa, Samuel Schwarz, Marios Papachristou, Rajiv Shah, Stephen Ventrelli.   

Abstract

Many clinicians order focused computed tomography (CT) examinations for trauma patients based on history and physical examinations. Trauma patients transferred to our level I trauma center undergo an extensive, nonfocused standard trauma CT protocol. We hypothesize that the use of the standard trauma CT protocol does not contribute significant clinical information for patient care when compared with CT examinations based on history and physical examination. We aim to quantify the utility of the additional CT examinations required by our institution's trauma protocol compared with emergent CT examinations dictated by the patient's history and physical examination findings. In this IRB-approved study, we retrospectively evaluated 132 trauma patients transferred to our center who underwent additional CT examinations as determined by fulfillment of our institution's standard trauma CT protocol. The emergency radiologist evaluated the CT examinations acquired after the patient's transfer to determine if there were any additional acute findings that were identified on these additional examinations compared with the initial assessment undertaken at the outside institution. A total of 101 patients transferred to our trauma center met inclusion criteria. The majority of these patients sustained minor trauma. The standard trauma protocol generated 474 negative CT examinations in 101 patients. In seven patients, there were unexpected acute findings. However, these unexpected acute findings did not change clinical management in any of the patients. After initial evaluation, the acquisition of additional nonfocused CT examinations based on the standard trauma CT protocol provides little useful clinical information in patients who are transferred for minor trauma. Rather, CT utilization should be based on clinical findings. Replacement of standard trauma CT protocol with focused CT examinations in trauma patients is a way to curtail overutilization, thereby decreasing health care cost and the amount of patient radiation exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24532129     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-014-1200-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  32 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of immediate total-body computed tomography compared with selective radiological imaging of injured patients.

Authors:  J C Sierink; T P Saltzherr; J B Reitsma; O M Van Delden; J S K Luitse; J C Goslings
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging.

Authors:  C Craig Blackmore; Robert S Mecklenburg; Gary S Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Image Gently(SM): a national education and communication campaign in radiology using the science of social marketing.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Jennifer Boylan; Priscilla F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Shawn Farley; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Diego Jaramillo; Neil D Johnson; Sue C Kaste; Gregory Morrison; Keith J Strauss
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  One-year treatment costs of trauma care in the USA.

Authors:  Sharada Weir; David S Salkever; Frederick P Rivara; Gregory J Jurkovich; Avery B Nathens; Ellen J Mackenzie
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Addressing overutilization in medical imaging.

Authors:  William R Hendee; Gary J Becker; James P Borgstede; Jennifer Bosma; William J Casarella; Beth A Erickson; C Douglas Maynard; James H Thrall; Paul E Wallner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Transfer patient imaging: a survey of members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Robinson; Michael F McNeeley
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-04-24

8.  Value of contrast-enhanced CT for managing mesenteric injuries after blunt trauma: review of five-year experience.

Authors:  Mariano Scaglione; Fabio Pinto; Francesco Lassandro; Luigia Romano; Antonio Pinto; Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2002-02-13

Review 9.  The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 Intersociety Conference.

Authors:  N Reed Dunnick; Kimberly E Applegate; Ronald L Arenson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Impact of whole-body computed tomography on mortality and surgical management of severe blunt trauma.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Yeguiayan; Anabelle Yap; Marc Freysz; Delphine Garrigue; Claude Jacquot; Claude Martin; Christine Binquet; Bruno Riou; Claire Bonithon-Kopp
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  6 in total

1.  Characterization of indeterminate spleen lesions in primary CT after blunt abdominal trauma: potential role of MR imaging.

Authors:  Sonja Gordic; Hatem Alkadhi; Hans-Peter Simmen; Guido Wanner; Dieter Cadosch
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-05-01

2.  Imaging algorithms and CT protocols in trauma patients: survey of Swiss emergency centers.

Authors:  R Hinzpeter; T Boehm; D Boll; C Constantin; F Del Grande; V Fretz; S Leschka; T Ohletz; M Brönnimann; S Schmidt; T Treumann; P-A Poletti; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Patients with falls from standing height and head or neck injury may not require body CT in the absence of signs or symptoms of body injury.

Authors:  Asad Baig; Michael J Drabkin; Fiza Khan; Joshua Fogel; Salman Shah
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-08-20

4.  Effect of spinal immobilisation devices on radiation exposure in conventional radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Baukje Hemmes; Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Gerrit J Kemerink; Peter R G Brink; Martijn Poeze
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-01-11

5.  Cross-sectional imaging of the torso reveals occult injuries in asymptomatic blunt trauma patients.

Authors:  Gregory J Roberts; Lewis E Jacobson; Michelle M Amaral; Courtney D Jensen; Louis Cooke; Jacqueline F Schultz; Alexander J Kinstedt; Jonathan M Saxe
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.