Literature DB >> 17411843

The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 Intersociety Conference.

N Reed Dunnick1, Kimberly E Applegate, Ronald L Arenson.   

Abstract

The participants of the 2004 Intersociety Conference met to discuss the growing problem of self-referral. The United States spends more of its gross national product on health care than other countries, especially Japan and those in Western Europe. Imaging accounts for a large and growing portion of those costs. Despite spending so much on health care, the United States ranks relatively low in measures of national health, including such parameters as infant mortality and even life expectancy. Because the federal government must keep health care expenditures to a "sustainable growth rate," increases in use are likely to be accompanied by decreases in reimbursement per case. Thus, conference participants agreed that the real problem is inappropriate use, which may arise from (1) ignorance of what specific imaging studies are needed when, (2) high public expectations for imaging tests, (3) the fear of liability for a missed diagnosis (defensive medicine), and (4) self-referral. The Stark laws have been largely ineffective in preventing self-referral because there are many loopholes, and the laws are inconsistently enforced. Among the many potential solutions are the education of our clinical colleagues on appropriateness criteria; the education of the public on the costs of inappropriate use; tort reform; and working with third-party payers, especially the private insurance industry, to develop vigorous privileging programs, to require precertification for self-referred studies, or to establish differential payments for self-referred and non-self-referred imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17411843     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  18 in total

1.  Utilization rates of neuroradiology across neuroscience specialties in the private office setting: who owns or leases the scanners on which studies are performed?

Authors:  L S Babiarz; D M Yousem; L Parker; D C Levin; V Rao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines Implementation Study for Spinal Disorders: A Randomized Trial with Postal Follow-ups.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Louis Laurencelle; Cynthia Peterson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

3.  COLLABORADI: a rule-based diagnostic imaging prescription system to help the general practitioner to choose the most appropriate radiological imaging procedures.

Authors:  Romeo Placido; Domenico Calcaterra; Stefano Canitano; Giuseppe Capodieci; Giuseppe Di Modica; Maria Adele Marino; Enrico Pofi; Orazio Tomarchio; Antonio Orlacchio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Prereferral MRI use in patients with musculoskeletal tumors is not excessive.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Jose Morcuende; Joseph A Buckwalter; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Resource use and guideline concordance in evaluation of pulmonary nodules for cancer: too much and too little care.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Michael K Gould; Christopher G Slatore; Benjamin G Fincke; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  The role of routine imaging in pediatric cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Hadeel Halalsheh; Sue C Kaste; Fariba Navid; Armita Bahrami; Barry L Shulkin; Bhaskar Rao; Michelle Kunkel; Nathan Artz; Alberto Pappo
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xing; Yulia Bronstein; Merrick I Ross; Robert L Askew; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Utility of repeated abdominal CT scans after prior negative CT scans in patients presenting to ER with nontraumatic abdominal pain.

Authors:  Borko Nojkov; Michael C Duffy; Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: the Choosing Wisely top five list in adult pulmonary medicine.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Daniel R Ouellette; Edward Diamond; Vincent S Fan; Janet R Maurer; Richard A Mularski; Jay I Peters; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Utility of additional CT examinations driven by completion of a standard trauma imaging protocol in patients transferred for minor trauma.

Authors:  Matthew T Heller; Emanuel Kanal; Omar Almusa; Samuel Schwarz; Marios Papachristou; Rajiv Shah; Stephen Ventrelli
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.