Literature DB >> 20736333

Addressing overutilization in medical imaging.

William R Hendee1, Gary J Becker, James P Borgstede, Jennifer Bosma, William J Casarella, Beth A Erickson, C Douglas Maynard, James H Thrall, Paul E Wallner.   

Abstract

The growth in medical imaging over the past 2 decades has yielded unarguable benefits to patients in terms of longer lives of higher quality. This growth reflects new technologies and applications, including high-tech services such as multisection computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET). Some part of the growth, however, can be attributed to the overutilization of imaging services. This report examines the causes of the overutilization of imaging and identifies ways of addressing the causes so that overutilization can be reduced. In August 2009, the American Board of Radiology Foundation hosted a 2-day summit to discuss the causes and effects of the overutilization of imaging. More than 60 organizations were represented at the meeting, including health care accreditation and certification entities, foundations, government agencies, hospital and health systems, insurers, medical societies, health care quality consortia, and standards and regulatory agencies. Key forces influencing overutilization were identified. These include the payment mechanisms and financial incentives in the U.S. health care system; the practice behavior of referring physicians; self-referral, including referral for additional radiologic examinations; defensive medicine; missed educational opportunities when inappropriate procedures are requested; patient expectations; and duplicate imaging studies. Summit participants suggested several areas for improvement to reduce overutilization, including a national collaborative effort to develop evidence-based appropriateness criteria for imaging; greater use of practice guidelines in requesting and conducting imaging studies; decision support at point of care; education of referring physicians, patients, and the public; accreditation of imaging facilities; management of self-referral and defensive medicine; and payment reform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20736333     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  117 in total

1.  Utilization rates of neuroradiology across neuroscience specialties in the private office setting: who owns or leases the scanners on which studies are performed?

Authors:  L S Babiarz; D M Yousem; L Parker; D C Levin; V Rao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Automatic identification of critical follow-up recommendation sentences in radiology reports.

Authors:  Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz; Martin L Gunn; Fei Xia; Thomas H Payne
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

Review 3.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Forensic and medico-legal radiology: challenges, issues and new perspectives.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Michelangelo Nasuto; Antonio Pinto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Utilization and Cost of Mammography Screening Among Commercially Insured Women 50 to 64 Years of Age in the United States, 2012-2016.

Authors:  Jaya S Khushalani; Donatus U Ekwueme; Thomas B Richards; Susan A Sabatino; Gery P Guy; Yuanhui Zhang; Florence Tangka
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Utilization of breast cancer screening with magnetic resonance imaging in community practice.

Authors:  Deirdre A Hill; Jennifer S Haas; Robert Wellman; Rebecca A Hubbard; Christoph I Lee; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Karen J Wernli; Louise M Henderson; Natasha K Stout; Anna N A Tosteson; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Prime time to resuscitate clinical medicine and kill diagnostic greed?

Authors:  C Rajasoorya
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Associations between cancer-related information seeking and receiving PET imaging for routine cancer surveillance--an analysis of longitudinal survey data.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Laura Gibson; Hanna M Zafar; Stacy W Gray; Robert C Hornik; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  CT for pediatric, acute, minor head trauma: clinician conformity to published guidelines.

Authors:  L L Linscott; M M Kessler; D R Kitchin; K S Quayle; C F Hildebolt; R C McKinstry; S Don
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Image Sharing Technologies and Reduction of Imaging Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Hye-Young Jung; Aaron Ostrovsky; Lala Tanmoy Das; Geraldine B McGinty
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.