Asad Baig1, Michael J Drabkin2, Fiza Khan2, Joshua Fogel3, Salman Shah2. 1. Department of Radiology, Nassau University Medical Center, 2201 Hempstead Turnpike, East Meadow, NY, 11554, USA. asadbaigmd@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Nassau University Medical Center, 2201 Hempstead Turnpike, East Meadow, NY, 11554, USA. 3. Department of Business Management, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the rate of clinically impactful body injury among patients who had a fall from standing height with an associated head/neck injury, but without evidence of body injury on physical exam or plain radiographs. We also examine surgical/endovascular intervention related to body injury and mortality rates for head/neck and body injury. METHODS: Retrospective study of 288 patients with CT evidence of acute head/neck injury that underwent body CT despite the absence of clinical or radiographic evidence of body injury. Predictor variables were age, sex, race/ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: There were 11.5% (n = 33) with body injury on CT (n = 33). There were 3.1% (n = 9) with clinically impactful body injury. No patient had either surgical/endovascular intervention or mortality related to body injury. Additionally, 8.7% (n = 25) had mortality from head/neck injury. Increased age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.08, p = 0.01) and overweight BMI (25-29.99 kg/m2) (OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.07, 7.62, p = 0.04) were each significantly associated with increased odds for mortality from head/neck injury. CONCLUSION: Patients with falls from standing height and known head/neck injury had a low rate of clinically impactful body injury. None of the studied variables were associated with increased risk of body injury in this patient population. The low rate of clinically impactful body injury and the lack of any mortality, procedure, or transfusion resulting from body injury suggest that body CT may not be necessary in patients with head/neck injury in the absence of clinical or radiographic evidence of body injury.
PURPOSE: To determine the rate of clinically impactful body injury among patients who had a fall from standing height with an associated head/neck injury, but without evidence of body injury on physical exam or plain radiographs. We also examine surgical/endovascular intervention related to body injury and mortality rates for head/neck and body injury. METHODS: Retrospective study of 288 patients with CT evidence of acute head/neck injury that underwent body CT despite the absence of clinical or radiographic evidence of body injury. Predictor variables were age, sex, race/ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: There were 11.5% (n = 33) with body injury on CT (n = 33). There were 3.1% (n = 9) with clinically impactful body injury. No patient had either surgical/endovascular intervention or mortality related to body injury. Additionally, 8.7% (n = 25) had mortality from head/neck injury. Increased age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.08, p = 0.01) and overweight BMI (25-29.99 kg/m2) (OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.07, 7.62, p = 0.04) were each significantly associated with increased odds for mortality from head/neck injury. CONCLUSION:Patients with falls from standing height and known head/neck injury had a low rate of clinically impactful body injury. None of the studied variables were associated with increased risk of body injury in this patient population. The low rate of clinically impactful body injury and the lack of any mortality, procedure, or transfusion resulting from body injury suggest that body CT may not be necessary in patients with head/neck injury in the absence of clinical or radiographic evidence of body injury.
Authors: Malkeet Gupta; David L Schriger; Jonathan R Hiatt; Henry G Cryer; Areti Tillou; Jerome R Hoffman; Larry J Baraff Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-09-03 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Robert G Sise; Richard Y Calvo; David A Spain; Thomas G Weiser; Kristan L Staudenmayer Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.313