Literature DB >> 20630028

Evaluation of the role of the pharmacological inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus multidrug resistance pumps and the variable levels of the uptake of the sensitizer in the strain-dependent response of Staphylococcus aureus to PPArg(2)-based photodynamic inactivation.

Mariusz Grinholc1, Joanna Zawacka-Pankau, Anna Gwizdek-Wiśniewska, Krzysztof P Bielawski.   

Abstract

The emergence of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria has caused an urgent need for the development of alternative therapeutics. One possibility is a combination of nontoxic photosensitizers (PS) and visible light, recognized as photodynamic therapy. Although it is known that Staphylococcus aureus is susceptible to photodynamic inactivation (PDI), the factors that determine the emerging variation among strains in the response to the treatment remain unclear. Some data indicate that cationic photosensitizing dyes such as phenothiaziniums which vary a lot in the chemical structure might target multidrug resistance pumps. In this study, we analyzed whether the uptake and activity of the multidrug resistance pumps might influence the previously observed variations among the clinical strains to protoporphyrin-derived, amphipilic protoporphyrin diarginate-mediated photodynamic treatment (12 J cm(-2) ). Using a new set of four additionally selected methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clinical as well as ATCC S. aureus strains we confirmed that the bactericidal effect of the PDI is strain-dependent as it ranged from 0 to 5 log(10) -unit reduction in viable counts. However, neither the variable levels of the uptaken PS nor the pharmacological inhibition of NorA efflux pump explained such a phenomenon.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation. The American Society of Photobiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630028     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00772.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  16 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to potentiate antimicrobial photoinactivation by overcoming resistant phenotypes.

Authors:  Domingo Mariano Adolfo Vera; Mark H Haynes; Anthony R Ball; Tianhong Dai; Christos Astrakas; Michael J Kelso; Michael R Hamblin; George P Tegos
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against pathogenic bacterial suspensions and biofilms using chloro-aluminum phthalocyanine encapsulated in nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro; Mariana Carvalho Andrade; Vanderlei Salvador Bagnato; Carlos Eduardo Vergani; Fernando Lucas Primo; Antônio Cláudio Tedesco; Ana Cláudia Pavarina
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  All you need is light: antimicrobial photoinactivation as an evolving and emerging discovery strategy against infectious disease.

Authors:  Tyler G St Denis; Tianhong Dai; Leonid Izikson; Christos Astrakas; Richard Rox Anderson; Michael R Hamblin; George P Tegos
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 4.  Microbial efflux pump inhibition: tactics and strategies.

Authors:  George P Tegos; Mark Haynes; J Jacob Strouse; Mohiuddin Md T Khan; Cristian G Bologa; Tudor I Oprea; Larry A Sklar
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  Fast and effective: intense pulse light photodynamic inactivation of bacteria.

Authors:  Tim Maisch; Franz Spannberger; Johannes Regensburger; Ariane Felgenträger; Wolfgang Bäumler
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  Can microbial cells develop resistance to oxidative stress in antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation?

Authors:  Nasim Kashef; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 18.500

7.  Multiresistant strains are as susceptible to photodynamic inactivation as their naïve counterparts: protoporphyrin IX-mediated photoinactivation reveals differences between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  Mariusz Grinholc; Aleksandra Rapacka-Zdonczyk; Bartosz Rybak; Florian Szabados; Krzysztof P Bielawski
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  The agr function and polymorphism: impact on Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to photoinactivation.

Authors:  Mariusz Grinholc; Joanna Nakonieczna; Alessandro Negri; Aleksandra Rapacka-Zdonczyk; Agata Motyka; Grzegorz Fila; Julianna Kurlenda; Justyna Leibner-Ciszak; Michael Otto; Krzysztof P Bielawski
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.252

Review 9.  Factors Determining the Susceptibility of Bacteria to Antibacterial Photodynamic Inactivation.

Authors:  Aleksandra Rapacka-Zdończyk; Agata Woźniak; Klaudia Michalska; Michał Pierański; Patrycja Ogonowska; Mariusz Grinholc; Joanna Nakonieczna
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 10.  Innovative strategies to overcome biofilm resistance.

Authors:  Aleksandra Taraszkiewicz; Grzegorz Fila; Mariusz Grinholc; Joanna Nakonieczna
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.