Literature DB >> 15155218

Effects of growth phase and extracellular slime on photodynamic inactivation of gram-positive pathogenic bacteria.

Faten Gad1, Touqir Zahra, Tayyaba Hasan, Michael R Hamblin.   

Abstract

The emergence of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria has led to efforts to find alternative antimicrobial therapeutics to which bacteria will not be easily able to develop resistance. One of these may be the combination of nontoxic dyes (photosensitizers [PS]) and visible light, known as photodynamic therapy, and we have reported its use to treat localized infections in animal models. While it is known that gram-positive species are generally susceptible to photodynamic inactivation (PDI), the factors that govern variation in degrees of killing are unknown. We used isogenic pairs of wild-type and transposon mutants deficient in capsular polysaccharide and slime production generated from Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus to examine the effects of extracellular slime on susceptibility to PDI mediated by two cationic PS (a polylysine-chlorin(e6) conjugate, pL-c(e6), and methylene blue [MB]) and an anionic molecule, free c(e6), and subsequent exposure to 665-nm light at 0 to 40 J/cm(2). Free c(e6) gave more killing of mutant strains than wild type, despite the latter taking up more PS. Log-phase cultures were killed more than stationary-phase cultures, and this correlated with increased uptake. The cationic pL-c(e6) and MB gave similar uptakes and killing despite a 50-fold difference in incubation concentration. Differences in susceptibility between strains and between growth phases observed with free c(e6) largely disappeared with the cationic compounds despite significant differences in uptake. These data suggest that slime production and stationary phase can be obstacles against PDI for gram-positive bacteria but that these obstacles can be overcome by using cationic PS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15155218      PMCID: PMC415578          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2173-2178.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  44 in total

Review 1.  Bactericidal effects of photoactivated porphyrins--an alternative approach to antimicrobial drugs.

Authors:  Z Malik; J Hanania; Y Nitzan
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.252

2.  Photobactericidal activity of phenothiazinium dyes against methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Wainwright; D A Phoenix; S L Laycock; D R Wareing; P A Wright
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples.

Authors:  M A Markwell; S M Haas; L L Bieber; N E Tolbert
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci.

Authors:  D J Freeman; F R Falkiner; C T Keane
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices.

Authors:  G D Christensen; W A Simpson; J J Younger; L M Baddour; F F Barrett; D M Melton; E H Beachey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Production of extra-cellular slime by Staphylococcus epidermidis during stationary phase of growth: its association with adherence to implantable devices.

Authors:  R Bayston; J Rodgers
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Identification of an antigenic marker of slime production for Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  G D Christensen; L P Barker; T P Mawhinney; L M Baddour; W A Simpson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  The bactericidal activity of a deuteroporphyrin-hemin mixture on gram-positive bacteria. A microbiological and spectroscopic study.

Authors:  Z Malik; H Ladan; Y Nitzan; B Ehrenberg
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.252

9.  Specific attachment of Staphylococcus aureus to immobilized fibronectin.

Authors:  I Maxe; C Rydén; T Wadström; K Rubin
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Inactivation of gram-negative bacteria by photosensitized porphyrins.

Authors:  Y Nitzan; M Gutterman; Z Malik; B Ehrenberg
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.421

View more
  44 in total

1.  Phenothiazinium antimicrobial photosensitizers are substrates of bacterial multidrug resistance pumps.

Authors:  George P Tegos; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Inhibitors of bacterial multidrug efflux pumps potentiate antimicrobial photoinactivation.

Authors:  George P Tegos; Kayo Masago; Fatima Aziz; Andrew Higginbotham; Frank R Stermitz; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Monitoring photodynamic therapy of localized infections by bioluminescence imaging of genetically engineered bacteria.

Authors:  Tatiana N Demidova; Faten Gad; Touqir Zahra; Kevin P Francis; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 6.252

Review 4.  Strategies to potentiate antimicrobial photoinactivation by overcoming resistant phenotypes.

Authors:  Domingo Mariano Adolfo Vera; Mark H Haynes; Anthony R Ball; Tianhong Dai; Christos Astrakas; Michael J Kelso; Michael R Hamblin; George P Tegos
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 5.  Can microbial cells develop resistance to oxidative stress in antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation?

Authors:  Nasim Kashef; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 18.500

6.  Multiresistant strains are as susceptible to photodynamic inactivation as their naïve counterparts: protoporphyrin IX-mediated photoinactivation reveals differences between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  Mariusz Grinholc; Aleksandra Rapacka-Zdonczyk; Bartosz Rybak; Florian Szabados; Krzysztof P Bielawski
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  The agr function and polymorphism: impact on Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to photoinactivation.

Authors:  Mariusz Grinholc; Joanna Nakonieczna; Alessandro Negri; Aleksandra Rapacka-Zdonczyk; Agata Motyka; Grzegorz Fila; Julianna Kurlenda; Justyna Leibner-Ciszak; Michael Otto; Krzysztof P Bielawski
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.252

8.  Study of photodynamic therapy in the control of isolated microorganisms from infected wounds--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Denise Pereira de Lima Carvalho; Juliana Guerra Pinto; Camila Di Paula Costa Sorge; Fabiana Regis Rodrigues Benedito; Sonia Khouri; Juliana Ferreira Strixino
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: study of bacterial recovery viability and potential development of resistance after treatment.

Authors:  Anabela Tavares; Carla M B Carvalho; Maria A Faustino; Maria G P M S Neves; João P C Tomé; Augusto C Tomé; José A S Cavaleiro; Angela Cunha; Newton C M Gomes; Eliana Alves; Adelaide Almeida
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Paradoxical potentiation of methylene blue-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation by sodium azide: role of ambient oxygen and azide radicals.

Authors:  Liyi Huang; Tyler G St Denis; Yi Xuan; Ying-Ying Huang; Masamitsu Tanaka; Andrzej Zadlo; Tadeusz Sarna; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 7.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.