Literature DB >> 24522619

Assessment of caspofungin susceptibility of Candida glabrata by the Etest®, CLSI, and EUCAST methods, and detection of FKS1 and FKS2 mutations.

N Bourgeois1, C Laurens, S Bertout, Y Balard, D Krasteva, P Rispail, L Lachaud.   

Abstract

Candida glabrata has emerged as a major pathogen in invasive candidiasis in recent years. Currently, guidelines for invasive candidiasis treatment recommend fluconazole or an echinocandin as the first-line therapy. Nevertheless, the resistance of Candida glabrata to echinocandin is an emerging problem and has been partly associated with mutations in the FKS1 and FKS2 genes. The Etest® is an appropriate method for determining antifungal susceptibility in emergency routine diagnosis. In this work, we evaluated the reliability of the Etest® in comparison with the two reference broth microdilution methods, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), to assess the caspofungin resistance of 193 isolates of Candida glabrata. The interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values was also discussed according to different breakpoints. Moreover, FKS1 and FKS2 mutations were investigated for isolates with high MICs. Our results showed that the MIC50 value was similar to the MIC90 value for each method. The Etest® method showed the lowest MIC values, whereas EUCAST presented the highest. Categorical agreement between the Etest® and CLSI methods was 100 % and 36 % using the breakpoints proposed by Arendrup et al. (Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56(7):3965-3968, 2012) and Pfaller et al. (Int J Antimicrob Agents 38(1):65-69, 2011), respectively. Two isolates showed high MIC values with the three methods and both presented FKS2 mutations. A novel FKS2 mutation was also reported for one isolate. Future epidemiological studies should also evaluate the reliability of the Etest® to detect echinocandin resistance, as it remains a routine method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24522619     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2069-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  16 in total

1.  Candida bloodstream infections: comparison of species distribution and resistance to echinocandin and azole antifungal agents in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008-2009).

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Shawn A Messer; Gary J Moet; Ronald N Jones; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 2.  Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Interlaboratory variability of Caspofungin MICs for Candida spp. Using CLSI and EUCAST methods: should the clinical laboratory be testing this agent?

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; M C Arendrup; M A Pfaller; L X Bonfietti; B Bustamante; E Canton; E Chryssanthou; M Cuenca-Estrella; E Dannaoui; A Fothergill; J Fuller; P Gaustad; G M Gonzalez; J Guarro; C Lass-Flörl; S R Lockhart; J F Meis; C B Moore; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; T Pelaez; S R B S Pukinskas; G St-Germain; M W Szeszs; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients.

Authors:  O A Cornely; M Bassetti; T Calandra; J Garbino; B J Kullberg; O Lortholary; W Meersseman; M Akova; M C Arendrup; S Arikan-Akdagli; J Bille; E Castagnola; M Cuenca-Estrella; J P Donnelly; A H Groll; R Herbrecht; W W Hope; H E Jensen; C Lass-Flörl; G Petrikkos; M D Richardson; E Roilides; P E Verweij; C Viscoli; A J Ullmann
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 5.  Echinocandin resistance in Candida species: mechanisms of reduced susceptibility and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Nicholas D Beyda; Russell E Lewis; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  FKS mutations and elevated echinocandin MIC values among Candida glabrata isolates from U.S. population-based surveillance.

Authors:  Alicia J Zimbeck; Naureen Iqbal; Angela M Ahlquist; Monica M Farley; Lee H Harrison; Tom Chiller; Shawn R Lockhart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Echinocandin susceptibility testing of Candida spp. Using EUCAST EDef 7.1 and CLSI M27-A3 standard procedures: analysis of the influence of bovine serum albumin supplementation, storage time, and drug lots.

Authors:  Maiken Cavling Arendrup; Juan-Luis Rodriguez-Tudela; Steven Park; Guillermo Garcia-Effron; Guillaume Delmas; Manuel Cuenca-Estrella; Alicia Gomez-Lopez; David S Perlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Increasing echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: clinical failure correlates with presence of FKS mutations and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations.

Authors:  Barbara D Alexander; Melissa D Johnson; Christopher D Pfeiffer; Cristina Jiménez-Ortigosa; Jelena Catania; Rachel Booker; Mariana Castanheira; Shawn A Messer; David S Perlin; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Caspofungin Etest susceptibility testing of Candida species: risk of misclassification of susceptible isolates of C. glabrata and C. krusei when adopting the revised CLSI caspofungin breakpoints.

Authors:  Maiken Cavling Arendrup; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Increases in SLT2 expression and chitin content are associated with incomplete killing of Candida glabrata by caspofungin.

Authors:  Jason M Cota; Jodi L Grabinski; Robert L Talbert; David S Burgess; P David Rogers; Thomas D Edlind; Nathan P Wiederhold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Resistance of Candida spp. to antifungal drugs in the ICU: where are we now?

Authors:  Danièle Maubon; Cécile Garnaud; Thierry Calandra; Dominique Sanglard; Muriel Cornet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Genetic Basis of Azole and Echinocandin Resistance in Clinical Candida glabrata in Japan.

Authors:  Hazim O Khalifa; Teppei Arai; Hidetaka Majima; Akira Watanabe; Katsuhiko Kamei
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Absence of Azole or Echinocandin Resistance in Candida glabrata Isolates in India despite Background Prevalence of Strains with Defects in the DNA Mismatch Repair Pathway.

Authors:  Ashutosh Singh; Kelley R Healey; Priyanka Yadav; Gargi Upadhyaya; Neelam Sachdeva; Smita Sarma; Anil Kumar; Bansidhar Tarai; David S Perlin; Anuradha Chowdhary
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Fluconazole and Echinocandin Resistance of Candida glabrata Correlates Better with Antifungal Drug Exposure Rather than with MSH2 Mutator Genotype in a French Cohort of Patients Harboring Low Rates of Resistance.

Authors:  Sarah Dellière; Kelley Healey; Maud Gits-Muselli; Bastien Carrara; Alessandro Barbaro; Nicolas Guigue; Christophe Lecefel; Sophie Touratier; Marie Desnos-Ollivier; David S Perlin; Stéphane Bretagne; Alexandre Alanio
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Low Level of Antifungal Resistance in Iranian Isolates of Candida glabrata Recovered from Blood Samples in a Multicenter Study from 2015 to 2018 and Potential Prognostic Values of Genotyping and Sequencing of PDR1.

Authors:  Amir Arastehfar; Farnaz Daneshnia; Kamiar Zomorodian; Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh; Sadegh Khodavaisy; Hossein Zarrinfar; Ferry Hagen; Zahra Zare Shahrabadi; Michaela Lackner; Hossein Mirhendi; Mohammadreza Salehi; Maryam Roudbary; Weihua Pan; Markus Kostrzewa; Teun Boekhout
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Antifungal Susceptibly Testing by Concentration Gradient Strip Etest Method for Fungal Isolates: A Review.

Authors:  Eric Dannaoui; Ana Espinel-Ingroff
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-22

7.  Low level of antifungal resistance of Candida glabrata blood isolates in Turkey: Fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentration and FKS mutations can predict therapeutic failure.

Authors:  Amir Arastehfar; Farnaz Daneshnia; Mohammadreza Salehi; Melike Yaşar; Tuğrul Hoşbul; Macit Ilkit; Weihua Pan; Ferry Hagen; Nazlı Arslan; Hatice Türk-Dağı; Süleyha Hilmioğlu-Polat; David S Perlin; Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.377

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.