Literature DB >> 30936110

Low Level of Antifungal Resistance in Iranian Isolates of Candida glabrata Recovered from Blood Samples in a Multicenter Study from 2015 to 2018 and Potential Prognostic Values of Genotyping and Sequencing of PDR1.

Amir Arastehfar1, Farnaz Daneshnia1, Kamiar Zomorodian2,3, Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh4, Sadegh Khodavaisy5,6, Hossein Zarrinfar7, Ferry Hagen1, Zahra Zare Shahrabadi2,3, Michaela Lackner8, Hossein Mirhendi9, Mohammadreza Salehi10, Maryam Roudbary11, Weihua Pan12, Markus Kostrzewa13, Teun Boekhout1,14.   

Abstract

Establishing an effective empirical antifungal therapy requires that national surveillance studies be conducted. Herein, we report the clinical outcome of infections with and the microbiological features of Iranian isolates of Candida glabrata derived from patients suffering from candidemia. C. glabrata isolates were retrospectively collected from four major cities in Iran; identified by a 21-plex PCR, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, and large subunit of ribosomal DNA sequencing; and genotyped by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Mutations in PDR1, ERG11, and hot spot 1 (HS1) of FKS1 and FKS2 were investigated, and antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) was performed (by the CLSI M27-A3 and M27-S4 methods). Seventy isolates of C. glabrata were collected from 65 patients with a median age of 58 years. Fluconazole was the most widely used (29.23%) and least effective antifungal agent. The overall crude mortality rate was 35.4%. Only one strain was resistant to fluconazole, and 57.7% and 37.5% of the isolates were non-wild type (non-WT) for susceptibility to caspofungin and voriconazole, respectively. All isolates showed the WT phenotype for amphotericin B, posaconazole, and itraconazole. HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2 did not harbor any mutations, while numerous missense mutations were observed in PDR1 and ERG11 AFLP clustered our isolates into nine genotypes; among them, genotypes 1 and 2 were significantly associated with a higher mortality rate (P = 0.034 and P = 0.022, α < 0.05). Moreover, 83.3% of patients infected with strains harboring a single new mutation in PDR1, T745A, died despite treatment with fluconazole or caspofungin. Overall, Iranian isolates of C. glabrata were susceptible to the major antifungal drugs. Application of genotyping techniques and sequencing of a specific gene (PDR1) might have prognostic implications.
Copyright © 2019 Arastehfar et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida glabratazzm321990; CgPDR1zzm321990; ERG11zzm321990; HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2zzm321990; Iran; antifungal susceptibility testing; candidemia; genotyping

Year:  2019        PMID: 30936110      PMCID: PMC6591624          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02503-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


INTRODUCTION

Candida glabrata is considered the second most common cause of candidemia in the United States and some European countries (1–4) and the third most common cause in Spain (5). Patients infected with C. glabrata require higher expenses for health care and longer stays in the hospital than those infected with C. albicans (6). The emergence of strains resistant to fluconazole (FLC) (7), echinocandins, and/or other antifungals (multidrug-resistant [MDR] strains) (8, 9), along with the limited number of antifungal drugs, has created a therapeutic challenge. Although gain-of-function mutations in the transactivating transcription factor of C. glabrata PDR1 (CgPDR1) have been considered the main cause of azole resistance in C. glabrata (10), some mutations in ERG11 are linked to MDR strains highly resistant to FLC, voriconazole (VRC), and amphotericin B (AMB) (11). Resistance to echinocandins is mainly mediated by mutations in hot spot 1 (HS1) of FKS1 and FKS2 (12), which are considered independent factors for the prediction of the therapeutic failure of echinocandins (13). Although C. glabrata is recognized to be an asexual Candida species, genomic studies showed a high genetic variability of the clinical isolates of C. glabrata obtained from various countries (14). Moreover, it has been known that a higher mortality rate is attributable to some genotypes (15), and it might even be hypothesized that some genotypes are more virulent and resistant (15). Hence, utilization of genotyping techniques, such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (15), microsatellite typing (9), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (16), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis (17), and polymorphic locus sequence typing (18), is relevant for infection control. Although MLST has been extensively used for the genotyping of clinical isolates of C. glabrata, AFLP showed a higher resolution (19), and it is also a preferred typing method for C. auris (20) and Aspergillus terreus (21). Determination of the antifungal susceptibility pattern on a national level is a prerequisite to understanding the evolving susceptibility profile of C. glabrata. A lack of systematic and nationwide microbiological and clinical data for Iranian isolates of C. glabrata recovered from blood samples prompted us to conduct the present study. Clinical isolates of C. glabrata were retrospectively collected from four major cities in Iran from 2015 to 2018. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed according to the CLSI M27-A3 and M27-S4 methods (22, 23), characterization of genotypes was carried out by AFLP, and the presence of mutations in genes conferring resistance to azoles (PDR1 and ERG11) and echinocandins (HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2) was explored. Moreover, important clinical data were mined from the history of infected patients and are presented.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes.

The clinical data used in this study are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material (in the form of an Excel file). In total, 70 isolates of C. glabrata were recovered from 65 patients with a median age of 58 years. Among them, 47.7% (n = 31) were female and 52.3% (n = 34) were male. The majority of the isolates (86.1%; n = 56) were recovered from blood, followed by central venous catheters and abdominal fluids, each at 3.08% (n = 2 each), and abdominal wounds, dialysis fluid, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), double lumen (DL), and triple lumen (TL), each at 1.54% (n = 1 each) (Table S2). Intensive care units, coronary care units, neonatal intensive care units, and pediatric intensive care units accommodated the majority of the patients (47.69%), followed by other hospital units, including surgery (18.46%), emergency (15.38%), internal medicine (12.31%), pediatric (3.08%), and infectious diseases (1.54%) units and general units for men (1.54%). Regarding underlying conditions, other infections and tumors were observed in 47.7% of patients, followed by conditions related to trauma and surgery (20.00%), metabolic disorders (9.23%), blood-associated disease (7.69%), autoimmune disease and liver and kidney dysfunctions (each at 4.62%), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB; 3.08%); and poisoning (1.54%). The majority of patients were treated with fluconazole (29.23%), followed by caspofungin (CAS; 18.46%), AMB (10.77%), voriconazole (3.08%), and clotrimazole ointment (1.54%). Patients treated with caspofungin showed the highest rate of survival (83.3%), followed by those treated with AMB (71.43%) and fluconazole (52.63%). Twenty-four (36.92%) patients did not receive any treatment, and 9 of them (37.50%) died and 15 (62.50%) survived. The overall crude mortality rate among patients infected with C. glabrata was 35.4% (n = 23).

Screening for mutations in PDR1, ERG11, and HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2.

Sequencing for mutations in PDR1 showed that 54.92% (n = 39) of the isolates contained nonsynonymous mutations (Table 1, Tables S3 and S4, and Fig. S3), 45.08% (n = 39) of the isolates were wild type (WT), and 64.78% (n = 39) harbored silent mutations (Table S4). Twenty-eight percent of the mutations were located in the region between the binding and middle homology domains and found in isolates that showed the highest MIC values for fluconazole (≥32 and 64 μg/ml). Regarding the association of the occurrence of mutations in PDR1 and voriconazole MIC values, 45.1% of the isolates with wild-type PDR1 and 30.7% of the isolates with non-WT PDR1 (carrying various nonsynonymous mutations) had MIC values higher than the epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) (MIC ≥ 0.5 μg/ml) (Table 2). Among strains with nonsynonymous mutations in PDR1, K67N (MIC = 2 μg/ml), G128E + G493A (MIC = 0.5 μg/ml), K430M + T745A (MIC = 0.5 μg/ml), E555K (MIC = 4 μg/ml), and T745 + C930R (MIC = 0.5 μg/ml) exclusively occurred in strains with a voriconazole MIC greater than the ECV (Table 2). Regarding ERG11, 36.6% (n = 26) of the isolates showed nonsynonymous mutations, 63.38% (n = 26) were wild type, and 81.69% (n = 58) harbored silent mutations (Table 3, Tables S3 and S4, and Fig. S3). Almost 22.53% (n = 16) of the isolates simultaneously contained mutations in both the PDR1 and ERG11 genes (Table S4). The hot spot 1 regions of both FKS1 and FKS2 were devoid of any mutations. Isolates simultaneously harboring mutations in both PDR1 and ERG11 and those harboring a mutation in either gene did not show significantly higher MIC values than the wild types. Surprisingly, five out of six patients infected with strains containing a single mutation of T745A in PDR1 died, despite treatment with fluconazole, caspofungin, or a combination of both drugs. These strains were found in two cities, Mashhad (n = 5) and Shiraz (n = 1), and as determined using AFLP, they were clustered into five distinguishing genotypes (two strains from Mashhad shared the same genotype).
TABLE 1

Frequency of resistance to fluconazole in wild-type and mutated strains for PDR1

Polymorphism(s) in PDR1No. of isolates with the following MIC (μg/ml):
≤0.51248163264128≥256Total
WT51510132
K67N11
P68S, P135T, D235N112
P76S, P145T, D243N3111a 6
P117S11
G128E11
G128E, G493A11
N162S11
N162S, F944S11
G189V11
Y285N, T286A, K430M, T745A11
K430M22
K430M, E441K11
K430M, L454P11
K430M, T745A11
K430M, G493A, T745A11
E555K11
G574S11
T745A1326
T745A, C930R11
A828T1
C930R2316
A1004C11

Only one of the isolates with this mutation (P76S, P145T, D243N) was resistant to fluconazole, and the rest of the isolates were 100% SDD to this drug.

TABLE 2

Frequency of isolates with wild-type and mutated PDR1 profile along with their MIC values for voriconazole

Polymorphism(s) in PDR1% of isolates with MIC:
No. of isolates along with the following MIC (μg/ml):
Less than ECVGreater than ECV≤0.06250.1250.250.5124816≥32Total
WT54.945.1179643131
K67N0.0010011
P68S, P135T, D235N1000.0022
P76S, P145T, D243N67.6733.332226
P117S1000.0011
G128E1000.0011
G128E, G493A0.0010011
N162S1000.0011
N162S, F944S1000.0011
G189V1000.0011
Y285N, T286A, K430M, T745A1000.0011
K430M1000.00112
K430M, E441K1000.0011
K430M, L454P1000.0011
K430M, T745A0.0010011
K430M, G493A, T745A1000.0011
E555K0.0010011
G574S1000.0011
T745A5050111216
T745A, C930R0.0010011
A828T0.0010011
C930R67.6733.3322116
A1004C1000.0011
TABLE 3

Frequency of resistance to fluconazole in wild-type and mutated strains for ERG11

Polymorphism(s) in ERG11No. of isolates along with the following MIC (μg/ml):
≤0.51248163264128≥256Total
WT17181351a 45
D196N1
N368T23712
N368T, H430P112
N368T, K456R, G457C, V458F11
N425I11
H430P1427
K456R, G457C, V458F11

Only one of the ERG11 wild-type isolates was fluconazole resistant, and the rest of the wild-type isolates and the isolates with ERG11 mutations were 100% SDD to this drug.

Frequency of resistance to fluconazole in wild-type and mutated strains for PDR1 Only one of the isolates with this mutation (P76S, P145T, D243N) was resistant to fluconazole, and the rest of the isolates were 100% SDD to this drug. Frequency of isolates with wild-type and mutated PDR1 profile along with their MIC values for voriconazole Frequency of resistance to fluconazole in wild-type and mutated strains for ERG11 Only one of the ERG11 wild-type isolates was fluconazole resistant, and the rest of the wild-type isolates and the isolates with ERG11 mutations were 100% SDD to this drug.

Genotyping of isolates using AFLP.

AFLP divided our isolates into 9 distinct clusters (genotype 1 [G1] to G9), and genotype 2 was comprised of three subgenotypes, G2A, G2B, and G2C (Fig. 1). Two isolates, collected from Tehran and Isfahan, showed a bizarre banding pattern compared to the rest of the C. glabrata isolates, and they clustered with C. nivariensis and C. uthaithanina. Subsequently, the respective DNA samples were subjected to the 21-plex PCR, and two bands representing C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis were revealed, indicating that the DNA samples contained a mixture of the DNA of both of these species. As a result, the DNA samples obtained from these two isolates were excluded from downstream genotyping analysis. There was no significant difference between the resistance profile and the genotype clusters (Table 4). The associations of various genotypes with the profile of resistance to fluconazole are summarized in Table 4. Although by the chi-square test (two-tailed) the clinical outcome was significantly associated only with G3 (P = 0.025), logistic regression and path analysis showed that G1 (P = 0.034) and G2 (P = 0.022) were significantly associated with a higher rate of mortality (α < 0.05), while G3 was significantly associated with survival (P = 0.001, α < 0.05) (see the “Statistical analysis” section in the supplemental material). Moreover, by the chi-square test (two-tailed) there was no significant association between the clinical outcome and the VRZ resistance profile (P = 0.555). Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis did not show a significant association between the clinical outcome and the hospitalization duration (P = 0.291) (see the “Statistical analysis” section in the supplemental material).
FIG 1

AFLP genotyping for the studied strains of C. glabrata. Our isolates were clustered into nine genotypes using AFLP, and each genotype is distinctively color coded. ICU, intensive care unit; CCU, coronary care unit; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PICU, pediatric intensive care unit; FLZ, fluconazole; NYS, nystatin; AMB, amphotericin B; VRZ, voriconazole; CAS, caspofungin.

TABLE 4

MIC distribution of fluconazole among C. glabrata isolates of different genotypes

GenotypeNo. of isolates along with the following MIC (μg/ml):
≤0.51248163264128≥256Total
G128421a 17
G2 (B and C)4912126
G3243110
G4123
G5112
G6134
G71113
G811
G911

Only one of the isolates within genotype 1 (G1) was resistant to fluconazole, and the rest of the isolates were SDD to this drug.

AFLP genotyping for the studied strains of C. glabrata. Our isolates were clustered into nine genotypes using AFLP, and each genotype is distinctively color coded. ICU, intensive care unit; CCU, coronary care unit; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PICU, pediatric intensive care unit; FLZ, fluconazole; NYS, nystatin; AMB, amphotericin B; VRZ, voriconazole; CAS, caspofungin. MIC distribution of fluconazole among C. glabrata isolates of different genotypes Only one of the isolates within genotype 1 (G1) was resistant to fluconazole, and the rest of the isolates were SDD to this drug.

Antifungal susceptibility pattern.

All of the MIC values obtained in this study are summarized in Table 5 and Table S3. Resistance to fluconazole (MIC ≥ 64 μg/ml) was noted in only one isolate (1.4%), and the rest were susceptible dose dependent (SDD), while 36.43% (n = 28) of the isolates showed MIC values higher than the ECV for voriconazole (MIC ≥ 0.5 μg/ml) and all of the isolates showed the WT phenotype for posaconazole (PSC; MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml) and itraconazole (ITC; MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml). No cross-resistance between azole drugs was observed. For caspofungin, 57.74% of the isolates (n = 41) showed MICs above the ECV (≥0.5 μg/ml), while for AMB, none of the isolates showed an MIC greater than the ECV (AMB ECV > 2 μg/ml) (24). Although resistance to echinocandins is noted when resistance to at least two antifungal agents in this class is observed (12, 25), caspofungin was the only echinocandin agent that was available in our study. Moreover, due to the interlaboratory variation observed for caspofungin (26), the MIC values of caspofungin were combined with the sequence data for HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2 as a surrogate for the caspofungin MIC. Almost 24% (n = 17) of the isolates simultaneously had MIC values higher than the ECVs for both caspofungin and voriconazole (MIC ≥ 0.5 μg/ml), and among these isolates, 35.29% (n = 6) had MIC values of ≥1 μg/ml and ≥0.5 μg/ml for voriconazole and caspofungin, respectively. Fluconazole showed the highest geometric mean value (10.31), followed by amphotericin B (0.57), itraconazole (0.51), caspofungin (0.41), posaconazole (0.41), and voriconazole (0.32).
TABLE 5

Antifungal susceptibility data derived from C. glabrata isolates in this study

Antifungal drugNo. of isolates along with the following MIC (μg/ml):
MIC range (μg/ml)GMa mean MIC (μg/ml)
≤0.0160.0320.0640.1250.250.512481632≥64
FLC1112824512–6410.11
VRC220211664110.064–160.32
PSC1111527260.032–10.41
ITC2321341010.064–20.51
CAS82222190.125–10.41
AMB3521510.25–20.57

GM, geometric mean.

Antifungal susceptibility data derived from C. glabrata isolates in this study GM, geometric mean.

DISCUSSION

The steady increase in the incidence of candidemia due to C. glabrata, along with a concerning development of resistance to azoles and echinocandins and even the emergence of strains with MDR traits, highlights the importance of studying antifungal susceptibility, determining the subcellular mechanisms of resistance involved, and genotyping clinical isolates of C. glabrata (9, 12). Previously, studies conducted in China (9, 27), South Korea (15), India (28), and the United States (12) investigated the aforementioned aspects of clinical isolates of C. glabrata and showed variability in the rate of resistance to azoles and echinocandins in those countries. As this information for Iranian isolates of C. glabrata is lacking on a nationwide scale, we conducted a multicenter study to investigate the clinical and microbiological features of this species. In our study, no difference in the occurrence of candidemia due to C. glabrata was observed between males and females. Consistent with the findings of other studies, infections due to C. glabrata were mainly observed in elderly individuals (6, 29), with the median age being 58 years. Moreover, the underlying conditions observed for our patients, namely, the extensive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, cancer, other infections, and surgery, are recognized risk factors for the development of candidemia (6, 29). Although clinical guidelines consider echinocandins to be the frontline therapy for C. glabrata (30), in our study, caspofungin ranked as the second treatment option, and patients treated with caspofungin showed a higher rate of survival than those treated with fluconazole. The lower rate of utilization of echinocandins than azoles in developing countries might reflect the higher costs associated with these drugs (28). Unlike other studies, in which the mortality rate was reported to be 58% to 61% (31), in our study, approximately 35% of our patients died, similar to the rate reported from the United States (6). As no mutations were observed in HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2, none of our isolates were categorized as echinocandin resistant. Due to the unreliability of the MIC values of caspofungin (26) and the superiority of the presence of mutations in HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2 for the detection of resistance to echinocandins (32), resistance to echinocandins was inferred only based on the presence of a mutation in HS1 of the aforementioned genes. This is in line with our findings, where the vast majority of the isolates (57.74%) had an MIC greater than the ECV (0.5 μg/ml), while there were no mutations in HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2. Contrary to the echinocandin resistance rate in the United States, which is up to 13% (12), the lack of echinocandin resistance in our study is similar to that in other Asian countries, including South Korea (0%), India (0%), China (1.9%), and Turkey (2%) (15, 27, 28, 33), and European and South American countries (31, 34–37). This variation in the rate of resistance to echinocandins likely reflects the variation in the therapeutic regimens implemented in a specific region/country (28) and the genetic differences between isolates of C. glabrata (15). A low level of resistance to fluconazole was observed (one isolate, 1.4%), and the rest of the isolates were categorized to have the SDD phenotype. This rate of resistance to fluconazole is similar to what is observed in the other Asian and South American countries, where the incidence of fluconazole resistance varies from 0% to 8.9% (15, 27, 28, 33, 34). As strains harboring mutations in PDR1 or ERG11 did not exhibit higher MIC values than wild-type strains (Tables 3 and 5), it could be inferred that those mutations are not engaged in resistance. The fluconazole-resistant isolate carried previously described mutations (P76S, P145T, D243N) (27) that were also found in isolates with the SDD phenotype (Table 3). Although in some other Candida species, such as C. albicans (38), fluconazole and voriconazole resistance are governed by the same mechanism, none of our strains showed concurrent cross-resistance/a non-WT phenotype for FLZ and VRC. Moreover, the majority of strains with nonsynonymous mutations occurring in PDR1 (n = 26; 66.6%) had a VRZ MIC less than the ECV, and among those with an MIC greater than the ECV, only one-third were exclusively found among VRZ non-WT strains (strains with the K67N, G128E + G493A, K430M + T745A, E555K, and T745 + C930R mutations). Besides, PDR1 WT strains had a higher proportion with a non-WT phenotype for VRZ than non-WT strains (45.1% for WT strains versus 30.7% for non-WT strains) (Table 2). Collectively, these observations point to the fact that in C. glabrata, resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole might not be controlled by the same mechanism. For ERG11, all nonsynonymous mutations occurred in fluconazole SDD strains. X-ray crystallography studies of ERG11 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (39) and homology modeling in C. glabrata (40) showed that missense mutations in residues 132, 140, 143, and 464 and residues 146, 243, and 246, respectively, are linked to azole resistance. On the contrary, in our study none of the isolates with substitutions in the neighborhood of those residues (residues 196, 425, 430, and 456 to 458) showed resistance to fluconazole. Moreover, unlike S. cerevisiae (39), the occurrence of a mutation in residue 315 (G315D) of a clinical strain of C. glabrata caused multidrug resistance to fluconazole (MIC > 256 μg/ml), voriconazole (MIC > 256 μg/ml), and AMB (MIC > 32 μg/ml) (11). None of the isolates showed MIC values higher than the ECV (MIC > 2 μg/ml) for AMB. The low level or a lack of resistance to azoles and AMB or echinocandins in this study might be explained by the fact that none of our patients experienced previous and prolonged exposure to these antifungals (41, 42). Although mutations in the MSH2 (DNA mismatch repair pathway) gene correspond to hypermutable phenotypes of C. glabrata that can facilitate the development of azole-resistant and MDR strains (8), studies from India (28), France (43), and China (27) found that mutations in this gene are more associated with rare and specific genotypes. Therefore, we did not include this gene in our study. The observation of hypervariation in the virulence patterns for each strain of C. glabrata (44), along with the association of certain genotypes with a higher rate of mortality (15), revealed the importance of the use of genotyping techniques in clinical settings. In line with these findings, in our study, two genotypes, G1 and G2, showed a significant association with a higher rate of mortality (α < 0.05, P = 0.034 and P = 0.022, respectively), while G3 was significantly associated with survival (α < 0.05, P = 0.001). Additionally, it has been shown that mutations in PDR1 have implications for virulence, and strains carrying certain mutations showed reduced adherence to macrophages and increased adhesion to epithelial cells (10). Interestingly, we noticed that five out of six patients infected with strains carrying the single T745A mutation in PDR1 (not in combination with the other mutations in PDR1) died despite treatment with either fluconazole, caspofungin, or a combination of both drugs. Five of those isolates belonging to four genotypes (two strains shared the same genotype) were found in the same city (Mashhad) and the same hospital in which 80% of infected patients died (n = 4). The other isolate belonging to a different genotype was found in Shiraz, and the infected patient died. This conclusion is drawn based on the findings for a small number of strains, and so it is not conclusive, due to the pleiotropic functions of PDR1, and this specific mutation (T745A) might deserve further in vivo studies. Surprisingly, in our study isolates of each genotype of C. glabrata were recovered from patients hospitalized in different cities. Admittedly, AFLP might not have the genotyping resolution of whole-genome sequencing platforms, but this observation might be indicative of the nosocomial transmission of C. glabrata isolates. Although it is rarely reported, some studies have shown the nosocomial transmission of C. glabrata isolates in clinical settings (18, 45).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of isolates and ethical approval.

Isolates of C. glabrata were retrospectively collected from the Iranian cities of Tehran, Isfahan, Shiraz, and Mashhad from 2015 to 2018 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The procedure of study in each center was evaluated by regional ethical committee members, and accordingly, they were provided with ethical codes (IR.SUMS.REC.1397.365, IR.MUMS.fm.REC.1397.268, and IR.TUMS.SPH.REC.1396.4195). Prior to studying the isolates and analyzing the clinical data, each patient and the isolates derived from them were designated with specific codes to prevent exposing the patients’ personal data.

Identification.

Isolates were preliminarily identified by a 21-plex PCR (46). Isolates were serially coded from 1 to 70. They were reidentified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI Biotyper; Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) (47) and sequencing of domain 1 (D1) and D2 of the large subunit of ribosomal DNA (LSU rDNA) (48).

DNA extraction.

DNA samples were extracted by the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8,4, 1.4 M NaCl, 25 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 2% CTAB) (49). The quality of the DNA samples was assessed by use of a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) and the running of 5 μl of DNA sample on a 0.7% agarose gel, and the quality and quantity were evaluated by use of a QuBit double-stranded DNA BR assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA).

Primer design, PCR, and sequencing for FKS1, FKS2, PDR1, and ERG11.

The DNA sequences of HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2, PDR1, and ERG11 were determined and screened for the presence of mutations. Fourteen primers comprising 2 external primers and 12 internal primers were used to sequence PDR1, and 8 primers, including 2 external primers and 6 internal primers, were used to sequence ERG11 (Table S1 and Fig. S2). Primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technology (Leuven, Belgium). PCR mixtures for FKS1, FKS2, PDR1, and ERG11 were prepared in a volume of 50 μl and were as follows: 5 μl 10× buffer (10× NH4, no MgCl2), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) mix (dNTP mix, 100 mM; Biolab), 5 pmol of primers (primers FKS1-F, FKS1R, FKS2F, FKS2R, PDR1Fex, PDR1Rex, ERG11Fex, and ERG11Rex), and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase enzyme (Bio Taq DNA polymerase; Biolab). Milli-Q water was used to adjust the volume to 50 μl. All PCRs were set at the same annealing temperature, but variable incubation times were used for the extension phase. PCR programs contained the following steps: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s (FKS1), 1 min (FKS2), 2 min (ERG11), or 3 min (PDR1), followed by 72°C for 8 min. The PCR products were run on a 2% agarose gel.

Sequencing and analysis of sequences.

The primers presented in Table S1 were used for bidirectional dideoxy chain-terminated Sanger sequencing. Contigs were assembled and edited by the use of SeqMan software (DNAStar, Madison, WI, USA), and the sequences obtained were aligned by the use of MEGA software (v.7.0; Temple University, Philadelphia, PA). The sequences with GenBank accession numbers FJ550269.1 (10) and XM_445876 (50) were used as the WT references for the PDR1 and ERG11 sequences, respectively.

Genotyping using AFLP.

The amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) method suggested by Marchetta et al. (51) was employed to evaluate the genotypic patterns of our isolates of C. glabrata. AFLP data were analyzed by the use of BioNumerics software (v7.6; Applied Math Inc., Austin, TX, USA). The reference and type strains of C. glabrata (strains CBS 138 and CBS 2175, respectively) and the other closely related species, including C. nivariensis (CBS 9983 to CBS 9985 and CBS 10161), C. bracarensis (CBS 10154), C. uthaithanina (CBS 10932), C. kungkrabaensis (CBS 10927), Nakaseomyces delphensis (CBS 2170), and Nakaseomyces bacillisporus (CBS 7720) and a clinical isolate of C. bracarensis (generously provided by W. Liao, Shanghai, China), were included in the AFLP experiment.

Antifungal susceptibility testing.

The MIC values of the antifungal drugs were determined by a broth microdilution procedure as described in CLSI document M27-A3 (22). The following antifungal drugs were included: fluconazole (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA), voriconazole (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA), itraconazole (Santa Cruz Biotech, Dallas, TX, USA), posaconazole (MSD, Kenilworth, NJ, USA), caspofungin (Merck & Co., Inc.), and amphotericin B (Sigma Chemical Corporation, St. Louis, MO). For quality control purposes, C. parapsilosis (CBS 604) and C. krusei (CBS 5147) were used. Species-specific breakpoints were adopted from CLSI document M27-S4 (23). The MIC was read visually after 24 h and noted as the lowest concentration of fluconazole (FLZ) and caspofungin (CAS) resulting in at least a 50% reduction of growth compared to that of the control. Resistance to FLZ and CAS was noted when the MIC values were ≥64 μg/ml and ≥0.5 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC values of other azole drugs, including voriconazole (VRC) (≥ 1 μg/ml), posaconazole (PSC) (≥4 μg/ml), and itraconazole (ITC) (≥4 μg/ml), were interpreted according to epidemiological cutoff values (23, 52). The MIC values of AMB were noted to be the lowest concentration of the drug that showed a 100% reduction of growth of the test strain compared to that of a control strain grown without AMB, and isolates for which MIC values were >2.0 μg/ml were considered to be potentially resistant (23, 24, 52).

Statistical analysis.

Logistic regression and path analyses were performed to evaluate statistical significance and the association between the genotypes and death or survival. As multivariate logistic regression analysis does not consider the indirect influence of independent variables on dependent ones, path analysis was used to overcome this problem. Using path analysis, the association with mortality and survival was individually assessed for genotypes 1 to 3. Moreover, the chi-square test (two-tailed) was used to find the association between the clinical outcome and genotypes, voriconazole susceptibility profile (susceptible or resistance), and hospitalization duration for all patients. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (v.24 for Windows; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) (see the “Statistical analysis” section in the supplemental material).

Data availability.

All the isolates of C. glabrata studied in this project were deposited in the culture collection the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, and they were designated with the following CBS numbers: CBS 15665 to CBS 15720, CBS 15722 to CBS 15733, and CBS 15744. Sequences obtained for PDR1, ERG11, and HS1 of FKS1 and FKS2 were deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: MK847567 to MK847637, MK847780 to MK847850, MK847638 to MK847708, and MK847709 to MK847779, respectively.
  50 in total

1.  Candida nivariensis isolated from an Indonesian human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient suffering from oropharyngeal candidiasis.

Authors:  Retno Wahyuningsih; Ivo N SahBandar; Bart Theelen; Ferry Hagen; Gé Poot; Jacques F Meis; Anna Rozalyani; Ridhawati Sjam; Djoko Widodo; Samsuridjal Djauzi; Teun Boekhout
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Changing epidemiology of candidaemia in Australia.

Authors:  Belinda Chapman; Monica Slavin; Debbie Marriott; Catriona Halliday; Sarah Kidd; Ian Arthur; Narin Bak; Christopher H Heath; Karina Kennedy; C Orla Morrissey; Tania C Sorrell; Sebastian van Hal; Caitlin Keighley; Emma Goeman; Neil Underwood; Krispin Hajkowicz; Ann Hofmeyr; Michael Leung; Nenad Macesic; Jeannie Botes; Christopher Blyth; Louise Cooley; C Robert George; Pankaja Kalukottege; Alison Kesson; Brendan McMullan; Robert Baird; Jennifer Robson; Tony M Korman; Stella Pendle; Kerry Weeks; Eunice Liu; Elaine Cheong; Sharon Chen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Identification and typing of Malassezia yeasts using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE).

Authors:  B Theelen; M Silvestri; E Guého; A van Belkum; T Boekhout
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  National surveillance of fungemia in Denmark (2004 to 2009).

Authors:  Maiken Cavling Arendrup; Brita Bruun; Jens Jørgen Christensen; Kurt Fuursted; Helle Krogh Johansen; Poul Kjaeldgaard; Jenny Dahl Knudsen; Lise Kristensen; Jens Møller; Lene Nielsen; Flemming Schønning Rosenvinge; Bent Røder; Henrik Carl Schønheyder; Marianne K Thomsen; Kjeld Truberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of costs, length of stay, and mortality associated with Candida glabrata and Candida albicans bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Cassandra Moran; Chelsea A Grussemeyer; James R Spalding; Daniel K Benjamin; Shelby D Reed
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Epidemiology, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility, and outcome of candidemia across five sites in Italy and Spain.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Maria Merelli; Elda Righi; Ana Diaz-Martin; Eva Maria Rosello; Roberto Luzzati; Anna Parra; Enrico Maria Trecarichi; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Brunella Posteraro; Jose Garnacho-Montero; Assunta Sartor; Jordi Rello; Mario Tumbarello
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  FKS mutant Candida glabrata: risk factors and outcomes in patients with candidemia.

Authors:  Nicholas D Beyda; Julie John; Abdullah Kilic; Mohammad J Alam; Todd M Lasco; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Molecular Epidemiology and Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida glabrata in China (August 2009 to July 2014): A Multi-Center Study.

Authors:  Xin Hou; Meng Xiao; Sharon C-A Chen; Fanrong Kong; He Wang; Yun-Zhuo Chu; Mei Kang; Zi-Yong Sun; Zhi-Dong Hu; Ruo-Yu Li; Juan Lu; Kang Liao; Tie-Shi Hu; Yu-Xing Ni; Gui-Ling Zou; Ge Zhang; Xin Fan; Yu-Pei Zhao; Ying-Chun Xu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Molecular Fingerprinting Studies Do Not Support Intrahospital Transmission of Candida albicans among Candidemia Patients in Kuwait.

Authors:  Mohammad Asadzadeh; Suhail Ahmad; Noura Al-Sweih; Ziauddin Khan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Prevalent mutator genotype identified in fungal pathogen Candida glabrata promotes multi-drug resistance.

Authors:  Kelley R Healey; Yanan Zhao; Winder B Perez; Shawn R Lockhart; Jack D Sobel; Dimitrios Farmakiotis; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Dominique Sanglard; Saad J Taj-Aldeen; Barbara D Alexander; Cristina Jimenez-Ortigosa; Erika Shor; David S Perlin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  17 in total

1.  Anidulafungin Susceptibility Testing of Candida glabrata Isolates from Blood Cultures by the MALDI Biotyper Antibiotic (Antifungal) Susceptibility Test Rapid Assay.

Authors:  Mansoureh Vatanshenassan; Amir Arastehfar; Teun Boekhout; Judith Berman; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; Katrin Sparbier; Markus Kostrzewa
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Evaluation of Two Commercial Broth Microdilution Methods Using Different Interpretive Criteria for the Detection of Molecular Mechanisms of Acquired Azole and Echinocandin Resistance in Four Common Candida Species.

Authors:  Ha Jin Lim; Jong Hee Shin; Mi-Na Kim; Dongeun Yong; Seung A Byun; Min Ji Choi; Seung Yeob Lee; Eun Jeong Won; Seung-Jung Kee; Soo Hyun Kim; Myung-Geun Shin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Genetic Basis of Azole and Echinocandin Resistance in Clinical Candida glabrata in Japan.

Authors:  Hazim O Khalifa; Teppei Arai; Hidetaka Majima; Akira Watanabe; Katsuhiko Kamei
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  First Report of Candidemia Clonal Outbreak Caused by Emerging Fluconazole-Resistant Candida parapsilosis Isolates Harboring Y132F and/or Y132F+K143R in Turkey.

Authors:  Amir Arastehfar; Farnaz Daneshnia; Suleyha Hilmioğlu-Polat; Wenjie Fang; Melike Yaşar; Furkan Polat; Dilek Yeşim Metin; Petra Rigole; Tom Coenye; Macit Ilkit; Weihua Pan; Wanqing Liao; Ferry Hagen; Markus Kostrzewa; David S Perlin; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; Teun Boekhout
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Disclosing azole resistance mechanisms in resistant Candida glabrata strains encoding wild-type or gain-of-function CgPDR1 alleles through comparative genomics and transcriptomics.

Authors:  Sara B Salazar; Maria Joana F Pinheiro; Danielle Sotti-Novais; Ana R Soares; Maria M Lopes; Teresa Ferreira; Vitória Rodrigues; Fábio Fernandes; Nuno P Mira
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.542

6.  Evaluation of Molecular Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles, and Molecular Mechanisms of Antifungal Resistance of Iranian Candida parapsilosis Species Complex Blood Isolates.

Authors:  Amir Arastehfar; Farnaz Daneshnia; Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh; Ferry Hagen; Shahram Mahmoudi; Mohammadreza Salehi; Hossein Zarrinfar; Zahra Namvar; Zahra Zareshahrabadi; Sadegh Khodavaisy; Kamiar Zomorodian; Weihua Pan; Bart Theelen; Markus Kostrzewa; Teun Boekhout; Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 7.  Drug-Resistant Fungi: An Emerging Challenge Threatening Our Limited Antifungal Armamentarium.

Authors:  Amir Arastehfar; Toni Gabaldón; Rocio Garcia-Rubio; Jeffrey D Jenks; Martin Hoenigl; Helmut J F Salzer; Macit Ilkit; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; David S Perlin
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for the Rapid Detection of Fluconazole Resistance in Candida Isolates.

Authors:  Suhak Jeon; Jong Hee Shin; Ha Jin Lim; Min Ji Choi; Seung A Byun; Dain Lee; Seung Yeob Lee; Eun Jeong Won; Soo Hyun Kim; Myung Geun Shin
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Antifungal susceptibility, genotyping, resistance mechanism, and clinical profile of Candida tropicalis blood isolates.

Authors:  Amir Arastehfar; Farnaz Daneshnia; Ahmed Hafez; Sadegh Khodavaisy; Mohammad-Javad Najafzadeh; Arezoo Charsizadeh; Hossein Zarrinfar; Mohammadreza Salehi; Zahra Zare Shahrabadi; Elahe Sasani; Kamiar Zomorodian; Weihua Pan; Ferry Hagen; Macit Ilkit; Markus Kostrzewa; Teun Boekhout
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Candida tropicalis is the most prevalent yeast species causing candidemia in Algeria: the urgent need for antifungal stewardship and infection control measures.

Authors:  Youcef Megri; Amir Arastehfar; Teun Boekhout; Farnaz Daneshnia; Caroline Hörtnagl; Bettina Sartori; Ahmed Hafez; Weihua Pan; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; Boussad Hamrioui
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.887

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.