Literature DB >> 24518498

Advanced digestive neuroendocrine tumors: metastatic pattern is an independent factor affecting clinical outcome.

Francesco Panzuto1, Elettra Merola, Maria Rinzivillo, Stefano Partelli, Davide Campana, Elsa Iannicelli, Emanuela Pilozzi, Paolo Mercantini, Michele Rossi, Gabriele Capurso, Aldo Scarpa, Stefano Cascinu, Paola Tomassetti, Massimo Falconi, Gianfranco Delle Fave.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of different metastatic spread patterns on outcome in advanced digestive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with stage IV NETs, classified as group 1 (unilobar liver metastases), group 2 (bilobar liver metastases), group 3 (extra-abdominal metastases). End points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Risk factor analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: Of the 229 patients, 135 (58.9%) had pancreatic, and 94 (41.1%) small bowel NETs: 32 (13.9%) were included in group 1, 179 (78.2%) in group 2, and 18 (7.9%) in group 3. Median Ki67 was 4.5%. Overall, 5-year OS was 55%. Different OS was observed among the 3 groups: median survival not reached, 81 and 8 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median PFS was 18 months. Both OS and PFS were significantly affected by Ki67 and metastatic spread pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: The stratification of stage IV NET patients based on metastatic patterns, alongside Ki67, predicts the clinical outcome. The extent of metastatic disease is a previously unrecognized variable, which should be considered when evaluating the results of treatments in NET patients with advanced disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24518498     DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.327


  15 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in 78 Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Hisato Igarashi; Nao Fujimori; Masayuki Hijioka; Ken Kawabe; Yoshinao Oda; Robert T Jensen; Tetsuhide Ito
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Markers of Systemic Inflammatory Response are Prognostic Factors in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs): A Prospective Analysis.

Authors:  Apostolos Gaitanidis; Dhaval Patel; Naris Nilubol; Amit Tirosh; Samira Sadowski; Electron Kebebew
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Real-world study of everolimus in advanced progressive neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Francesco Panzuto; Maria Rinzivillo; Nicola Fazio; Filippo de Braud; Gabriele Luppi; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Francesca Lugli; Paola Tomassetti; Ferdinando Riccardi; Carmen Nuzzo; Maria Pia Brizzi; Antongiulio Faggiano; Alberto Zaniboni; Elisabetta Nobili; Davide Pastorelli; Stefano Cascinu; Marco Merlano; Silvana Chiara; Lorenzo Antonuzzo; Chiara Funaioli; Francesca Spada; Sara Pusceddu; Annalisa Fontana; Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Alessandra Cassano; Davide Campana; Giacomo Cartenì; Marialuisa Appetecchia; Alfredo Berruti; Annamaria Colao; Massimo Falconi; Gianfranco Delle Fave
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-08-12

4.  Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas at dynamic enhanced CT: comparison between grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma and grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumour.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Hyoung Jung Kim; Kyung Won Kim; Jae Ho Byun; Ki Byung Song; Ji Hoon Kim; Seung-Mo Hong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Stage IV Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Risk Score to Predict Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Francesco Panzuto; Elettra Merola; Marianne Ellen Pavel; Anja Rinke; Patrizia Kump; Stefano Partelli; Maria Rinzivillo; Victor Rodriguez-Laval; Ulrich Frank Pape; Rainer Lipp; Thomas Gress; Bertram Wiedenmann; Massimo Falconi; Gianfranco Delle Fave
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-02-23

6.  Impact of Peritoneal Metastasis on Survival of Patients With Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor.

Authors:  Martha Frances Wright; Justin Cates; Raul S Gonzalez; Satya Das; Jordan D Berlin; Chanjuan Shi
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  M Falconi; B Eriksson; G Kaltsas; D K Bartsch; J Capdevila; M Caplin; B Kos-Kudla; D Kwekkeboom; G Rindi; G Klöppel; N Reed; R Kianmanesh; R T Jensen
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.914

Review 8.  [Grading of neuroendocrine tumors].

Authors:  W Saeger; P A Schnabel; P Komminoth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Survival and prognostic factors analysis of 151 intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single center experience.

Authors:  Fanny Foubert; Maëva Salimon; Clotilde Dumars; Nicolas Regenet; Paul Girot; Aurélien Venara; Hélène Senellart; Marie-Françoise Heymann; Tamara Matysiak-Budnik; Yann Touchefeu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-02

10.  Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) in combination with other therapies for treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Rinzivillo; Ilaria De Felice; Ludovica Magi; Bruno Annibale; Francesco Panzuto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.