Literature DB >> 27379621

[Grading of neuroendocrine tumors].

W Saeger1, P A Schnabel2, P Komminoth3.   

Abstract

The current WHO classification of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) differentiates between typical carcinoids (low grade NET), atypical carcinoids (intermediate grade NET) and small cell and large cell carcinomas (high grade NET) according to the prognosis. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas are graded in an identical way. Together with the TNM system this enables a preoperative estimation of the prognosis in biopsies and fine needle aspirates. Well-differentiated tumors are graded into G1 tumors by the number of mitoses, <2 per 10 high-power fields (HPF) and the Ki-67 (index <3 %) and G2 tumors (2-20 mitoses/10 HPF, Ki-67 3-20 %). Discrepancies between the number of mitoses and the Ki-67 index are not uncommon and in these cases the higher value of the two should be applied. The more differentiated tumors of the G3 type have to be differentiated from undifferentiated carcinomas of the small cell type and large cell type with a much poorer prognosis. Prognosis relevant grading of thyroid cancers is achieved by special subtyping so that the G1-G3 system is not applicable. The rare cancers of the parathyroid gland and of the pituitary gland are not graded. Adrenal tumors also have no grading system. The prognosis is dependent on the Ki-67 index and with some reservations on the established scoring systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adrenal gland; Gastrointestinal tract; Lungs; Pancreas; Thyroid gland

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27379621     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-016-0186-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  71 in total

1.  Small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas are genetically similar and distinct from well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Shinichi Yachida; Efsevia Vakiani; Catherine M White; Yi Zhong; Tyler Saunders; Richard Morgan; Roeland F de Wilde; Anirban Maitra; Jessica Hicks; Angelo M Demarzo; Chanjuan Shi; Rajni Sharma; Daniel Laheru; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Laura H Tang; David S Klimstra; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Malignant pheochromocytoma: new malignancy criteria.

Authors:  Pierre de Wailly; Luigi Oragano; Francois Radé; Anthony Beaulieu; Vincent Arnault; Pierre Levillain; Jean Louis Kraimps
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour grading on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: high reproducibility and inter-observer agreement of the Ki-67 labelling index.

Authors:  B Weynand; I Borbath; V Bernard; C Sempoux; J-F Gigot; C Hubert; V Lannoy; P H Deprez; A Jouret-Mourin
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.073

4.  Ki67 labeling index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary tract: to count or not to count is not the question, but rather how to count.

Authors:  Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Classification of parathyroid cancer.

Authors:  Klaus-Martin Schulte; Anthony J Gill; Marcin Barczynski; Elias Karakas; Akira Miyauchi; W T Knoefel; Celestino Pio Lombardi; Nadia Talat; Salvador Diaz-Cano; Clive S Grant
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Prognostic factors in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: an analysis of 136 cases with a proposal for low-grade and intermediate-grade groups.

Authors:  Steven N Hochwald; Sui Zee; Kevin C Conlon; Roberto Colleoni; Otway Louie; Murray F Brennan; David S Klimstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: accurate grading with Ki-67 index on fine-needle aspiration specimens using the WHO 2010/ENETS criteria.

Authors:  Jessica M Farrell; Judy C Pang; Grace E Kim; Z Laura Tabatabai
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Pathohistological classification of pituitary tumors: 10 years of experience with the German Pituitary Tumor Registry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Saeger; Dieter K Lüdecke; Michael Buchfelder; Rudolf Fahlbusch; Hans-Jürgen Quabbe; Stephan Petersenn
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.664

9.  TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; H Alhman; M Caplin; A Couvelard; W W de Herder; B Erikssson; A Falchetti; M Falconi; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Hormone profiling, WHO 2010 grading, and AJCC/UICC staging in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor behavior.

Authors:  Emilie Morin; Sonia Cheng; Ozgur Mete; Stefano Serra; Paula B Araujo; Sara Temple; Sean Cleary; Steven Gallinger; Paul D Greig; Ian McGilvray; Alice Wei; Sylvia L Asa; Shereen Ezzat
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantitative 3D Assessment of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Assess Imaging Markers for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Lisa C Adams; Keno K Bressem; Julia Brangsch; Carolin Reimann; Kristin Nowak; Winfried Brenner; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Influence of Gender on Therapy and Outcome of Neuroendocrine Tumors of Gastroenteropancreatic Origin: A Single-Center Analysis.

Authors:  Martina T Mogl; Eva M Dobrindt; Josephine Buschermöhle; Claudia Bures; Johann Pratschke; Holger Amthauer; Christoph Wetz; Henning Jann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-01-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.