Literature DB >> 26378090

Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in 78 Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center retrospective study.

Lingaku Lee1, Hisato Igarashi1, Nao Fujimori1, Masayuki Hijioka1, Ken Kawabe1, Yoshinao Oda2, Robert T Jensen3, Tetsuhide Ito4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite an increase in the number of Japanese patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, long-term outcomes and prognostic factors, especially for those with advanced disease, remain unclear.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 78 patients with unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms treated at our hospital from January 1987 to March 2015. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Prognostic significance of several clinicopathological factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses using a Cox regression model.
RESULTS: Median overall survivals of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (n = 64) and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 14) were 83.7 and 9.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.08, P < 0.001). Although no significant differences were observed using a Ki-67 cut-off value of 2% (hazard ratio: 0.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.16-1.13, P = 0.0989), a Ki-67 cut-off of 10% was a significant predictor in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (hazard ratio: 9.95, 95% confidence interval, 3.01-32.97, P < 0.001). Treatment after the advent of targeted therapy (hazard ratio: 0.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.19, P < 0.001) and the presence of bone metastases (hazard ratio: 4.38, 95% confidence interval: 1.42-11.29, P = 0.013) were significant prognostic factors in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor evaluated by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis also revealed that a Ki-67 index ≥10% (hazard ratio: 38.8, 95% confidence interval: 8.42-226.62, P < 0.001), approval of targeted therapy (hazard ratio: 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.00-0.11, P < 0.001) and bone metastases (hazard ratio: 5.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-24.00, P = 0.039) were independent prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: We elucidated the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ki-67 index; pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma; pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; prognostic factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26378090      PMCID: PMC4668751          DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyv143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  54 in total

1.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary.

Authors:  Marianne Pavel; Eric Baudin; Anne Couvelard; Eric Krenning; Kjell Öberg; Thomas Steinmüller; Martin Anlauf; Bertram Wiedenmann; Ramon Salazar
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.914

2.  A single institution's 26-year experience with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a validation of current staging systems and a new prognostic nomogram.

Authors:  Trevor A Ellison; Christopher L Wolfgang; Chanjuan Shi; John L Cameron; Peter Murakami; Liew Jun Mun; Aatur D Singhi; Toby C Cornish; Kelly Olino; Zina Meriden; Michael Choti; Luis A Diaz; Timothy M Pawlik; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Barish H Edil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Exploring the rising incidence of neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, metastatic presentation, and outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Calvin How Lim Law; Moises Cukier; Refik Saskin; Ning Liu; Simron Singh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Incidence, patterns of care and prognostic factors for outcome of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): results from the National Cancer Registry of Spain (RGETNE).

Authors:  R Garcia-Carbonero; J Capdevila; G Crespo-Herrero; J A Díaz-Pérez; M P Martínez Del Prado; V Alonso Orduña; I Sevilla-García; C Villabona-Artero; A Beguiristain-Gómez; M Llanos-Muñoz; M Marazuela; C Alvarez-Escola; D Castellano; E Vilar; P Jiménez-Fonseca; A Teulé; J Sastre-Valera; M Benavent-Viñuelas; A Monleon; R Salazar
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors: a multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Lucio Gullo; Marina Migliori; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli; Rossella Bettini; Riccardo Casadei; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Vito D Corleto; Claudio Ceccarelli; Donatella Santini; Paola Tomassetti
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Clinical outcome and long-term survival in 118 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas.

Authors:  L Fischer; J Kleeff; I Esposito; U Hinz; A Zimmermann; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Survival and prognostic factor analysis in patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas.

Authors:  Jonathan Strosberg; Nancy Gardner; Larry Kvols
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Prognostic factors influencing survival from metastatic (stage IV) gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma.

Authors:  Cosimo Durante; Houda Boukheris; Clarisse Dromain; Pierre Duvillard; Sophie Leboulleux; Dominique Elias; Thierry de Baere; David Malka; Jean Lumbroso; Joël Guigay; Martin Schlumberger; Michel Ducreux; Eric Baudin
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.678

10.  Population-based study of islet cell carcinoma.

Authors:  James C Yao; Milton P Eisner; Colleen Leary; Cecile Dagohoy; Alexandria Phan; Asif Rashid; Manal Hassan; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Liver transplantation for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases in an era of transplant oncology.

Authors:  Keita Shimata; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Taizo Hibi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 2.  Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in Japan.

Authors:  Tetsuhide Ito; Susumu Hijioka; Toshihiko Masui; Atsuko Kasajima; Yuji Nakamoto; Noritoshi Kobayashi; Izumi Komoto; Masayuki Hijioka; Lingaku Lee; Hisato Igarashi; Robert Thomas Jensen; Masayuki Imamura
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 3.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 4.  Endocrine neoplasms in familial syndromes of hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Yulong Li; William F Simonds
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.678

5.  Utility of chromogranin B compared with chromogranin A as a biomarker in Japanese patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Masami Miki; Tetsuhide Ito; Masayuki Hijioka; Lingaku Lee; Kohei Yasunaga; Keijiro Ueda; Takashi Fujiyama; Yuichi Tachibana; Ken Kawabe; Robert T Jensen; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Differentiation of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging: The value of contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted imaging.

Authors:  Chuangen Guo; Xiao Chen; Zhongqiu Wang; Wenbo Xiao; Qidong Wang; Ke Sun; Xiaoling Zhuge
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-27

7.  Consideration of Age Is Necessary for Increasing the Accuracy of the AJCC TNM Staging System of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Zhengshi Wang; Wenli Jiang; Lijuan Zheng; Jie Yan; Jiaqi Dai; Caiguo Huang; Qian Zhang; Zhiqiang Yin; Xiangnan Gong; Yun Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  The differentiation of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the values of CT imaging features and texture analysis.

Authors:  Chuangen Guo; Xiaoling Zhuge; Qidong Wang; Wenbo Xiao; Zhonglan Wang; Zhongqiu Wang; Zhan Feng; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Hemorrhagic Colitis Caused by Everolimus in a Patient with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Case Report.

Authors:  Noriyuki Arakawa; Atsushi Irisawa; Kazuyuki Ishida; Takuya Tsunoda; Yoshiko Yamaguchi; Akane Yamabe; Makoto Eizuka; Shunzo Tokioka; Hiroto Wakabayashi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  c-Myc promotes lymphatic metastasis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor through VEGFC upregulation.

Authors:  Tsung-Ming Chang; Pei-Yi Chu; Wen-Chun Hung; Yan-Shen Shan; Hui-You Lin; Kuo-Wei Huang; Jeffrey S Chang; Li-Tzong Chen; Hui-Jen Tsai
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 6.518

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.