Literature DB >> 24516736

BD GeneOhm-MRSA assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly in nasal and non-nasal swab specimens from haematologic patients.

B Ghebremedhin1, B König1, W König1.   

Abstract

Infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are responsible for rising health care costs and have a high attribution to mortality. Reliable and rapid detection of MRSA carriage is essential. Real-time PCR allows an early detection of MRSA colonization within 2 h. By using the BD GeneOhm-MRSA assay we analysed directly swabs of different sampling sites and compared the assay with culture method. One thousand one hundred and sixty samples from 129 patients in Magdeburg were examined. Of the samples, 8 (0.69%) or 1117 (96.3%) were tested equally positive or negative by both methods whereas 16 (1.38%) specimens were MRSA positive only by the GeneOhm-MRSA assay and 6 (0.52%) were MRSA positive only by culture method. Thirteen samples (1.12%), which are culture negative, were unresolved by the GeneOhm-MRSA. With regard to the patients, seven were detected as MRSA carriers only by the GeneOhm-MRSA while one patient was tested positive for MRSA only by culture. Assuming 100% correct results by the culture method, sensitivity and specificity of GeneOhm-MRSA assay could be calculated as 84.4% and 96.1% for nasal swabs, 78.7% and 96.9% for all swabs under study, and 94.8% and 99.5% when focussed on patients. PPV and NPV were 70.3% and 98% for all specimens together, respectively. BD GeneOhm-MRSA assay is a sensitive test for the detection of MRSA colonization from swab specimens without the need for an initial culture, but should always be performed in parallel to the culture method for comparison reasons. Furthermore, our results indicate that in addition swabs taken from different body sites were successfully analysed by the BD GeneOhm-MRSA assay. However, we conclude that the PCR assay might not be a preferred tool for screening in haematologic patients with low MRSA rate; for screening haematologic patients, the culture method is sufficient enough.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; haematology; non-nasal specimens; real-time PCR; screening

Year:  2011        PMID: 24516736      PMCID: PMC3918132          DOI: 10.1556/EuJMI.1.2011.4.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)        ISSN: 2062-509X


  26 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Mastalex latex agglutination test for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus grown on different screening media.

Authors:  D F Brown; E Walpole
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Rapid detection of the mecA gene in methicillin resistant staphylococci using a colorimetric cycling probe technology.

Authors:  F Bekkaoui; J P McNevin; C H Leung; G J Peterson; A Patel; R S Bhatt; R N Bryan
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci from blood culture bottles by using a multiplex PCR assay.

Authors:  L Louie; J Goodfellow; P Mathieu; A Glatt; M Louie; A E Simor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay for detecting MRSA nasal colonization in Taiwanese adults.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Chen; Jann-Tay Wang; Wen-Sen Lee; Cheng-Hua Huang; Chun-Hsing Liao; Yee-Chun Chen; Shan-Chwen Chang
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.399

5.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  David K Warren; Robert S Liao; Liana R Merz; Michael Eveland; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Bridget Kufner; Karine Truchon; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Ari Robicsek; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Staphylococcus aureus: a well-armed pathogen.

Authors:  G L Archer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Heiman F L Wertheim; Damian C Melles; Margreet C Vos; Willem van Leeuwen; Alex van Belkum; Henri A Verbrugh; Jan L Nouwen
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Staphylococcus aureus strains which are not identified by rapid agglutination methods are of capsular serotype 5.

Authors:  J M Fournier; A Boutonnier; A Bouvet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative study of nasal bacterial carriage in pediatric patients from two different geographical regions.

Authors:  B Ghebremedhin; W Koenig
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2012-09-10

2.  PCR-based Approaches for the Detection of Clinical Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Jiang Zhang; Yinduo Ji
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2016-04-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.