Literature DB >> 26298492

The effect of resolution on viscous dissipation measured with 4D flow MRI in patients with Fontan circulation: Evaluation using computational fluid dynamics.

Merih Cibis1, Kelly Jarvis2, Michael Markl2, Michael Rose3, Cynthia Rigsby4, Alex J Barker3, Jolanda J Wentzel5.   

Abstract

Viscous dissipation inside Fontan circulation, a parameter associated with the exercise intolerance of Fontan patients, can be derived from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or 4D flow MRI velocities. However, the impact of spatial resolution and measurement noise on the estimation of viscous dissipation is unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of these parameters on viscous dissipation calculation. Six Fontan patients underwent whole heart 4D flow MRI. Subject-specific CFD simulations were performed. The CFD velocities were down-sampled to isotropic spatial resolutions of 0.5mm, 1mm, 2mm and to MRI resolution. Viscous dissipation was compared between (1) high resolution CFD velocities, (2) CFD velocities down-sampled to MRI resolution, (3) down-sampled CFD velocities with MRI mimicked noise levels, and (4) in-vivo 4D flow MRI velocities. Relative viscous dissipation between subjects was also calculated. 4D flow MRI velocities (15.6 ± 3.8 cm/s) were higher, although not significantly different than CFD velocities (13.8 ± 4.7 cm/s, p=0.16), down-sampled CFD velocities (12.3 ± 4.4 cm/s, p=0.06) and the down-sampled CFD velocities with noise (13.2 ± 4.2 cm/s, p=0.06). CFD-based viscous dissipation (0.81 ± 0.55 mW) was significantly higher than those based on down-sampled CFD (0.25 ± 0.19 mW, p=0.03), down-sampled CFD with noise (0.49 ± 0.26 mW, p=0.03) and 4D flow MRI (0.56 ± 0.28 mW, p=0.06). Nevertheless, relative viscous dissipation between different subjects was maintained irrespective of resolution and noise, suggesting that comparison of viscous dissipation between patients is still possible.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D flow MRI; Computational fluid dynamics; Congenital heart disease; Fontan; Phase contrast MRI; Resolution of MRI; Viscous dissipation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26298492      PMCID: PMC5096445          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.07.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  25 in total

1.  Synthetic dataset generation for the analysis and the evaluation of image-based hemodynamics of the human aorta.

Authors:  Umberto Morbiducci; Raffaele Ponzini; Giovanna Rizzo; Marco Evanghelos Biancolini; Francesco Iannaccone; Diego Gallo; Alberto Redaelli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effects of exercise and respiration on hemodynamic efficiency in CFD simulations of the total cavopulmonary connection.

Authors:  Alison L Marsden; Irene E Vignon-Clementel; Frandics P Chan; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Noninvasive quantification of fluid mechanical energy losses in the total cavopulmonary connection with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping.

Authors:  Anand K Venkatachari; Sandra S Halliburton; Randolph M Setser; Richard D White; George P Chatzimavroudis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Viscous energy loss in the presence of abnormal aortic flow.

Authors:  Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; Krishna Bandi; Julio Garcia; Mazen Albaghdadi; Patrick McCarthy; Robert O Bonow; James Carr; Jeremy Collins; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of cardiovascular flow paths in volunteers and patients with Fontan circulation.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Julia Geiger; Philip J Kilner; Daniela Föll; Brigitte Stiller; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Raoul Arnold; Alex Frydrychowicz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Fontan hemodynamics from 100 patient-specific cardiac magnetic resonance studies: a computational fluid dynamics analysis.

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Maria Restrepo; Elaine Tang; Diane A de Zélicourt; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Lucia Mirabella; James Bethel; Kevin K Whitehead; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries.

Authors:  Merih Cibis; Wouter V Potters; Frank J H Gijsen; Henk Marquering; Ed vanBavel; Antonius F W van der Steen; Aart J Nederveen; Jolanda J Wentzel
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data.

Authors:  P G Walker; G B Cranney; M B Scheidegger; G Waseleski; G M Pohost; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Univentricular heart.

Authors:  Paul Khairy; Nancy Poirier; Lise-Andrée Mercier
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Nonlinear power loss during exercise in single-ventricle patients after the Fontan: insights from computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Kevin K Whitehead; Kerem Pekkan; Hiroumi D Kitajima; Stephen M Paridon; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of Aortic Blood Flow and Wall Shear Stress in Aortic Stenosis and Its Association With Left Ventricular Remodeling.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Achudhan Karunaharamoorthy; Ralf Felix Trauzeddel; Alex J Barker; Edyta Blaszczyk; Michael Markl; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Reply: Importance of Stress Mapping of Aortic Wall in Aortic Valve Disease.

Authors:  Alex J Barker; David Guzzardi; Michael Markl; Paul W M Fedak
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Computational Fluid Dynamics and Additive Manufacturing to Diagnose and Treat Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Amanda Randles; David H Frakes; Jane A Leopold
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  The Advantages of Viscous Dissipation Rate over Simplified Power Loss as a Fontan Hemodynamic Metric.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Michael Tree; Phillip M Trusty; Wenjun Wu; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Ajit Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Vortex Flow in the Right Atrium Surrogates Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Thrombus After Atriopulmonary Connection-Type Fontan Operation: Vortex Flow Analysis Using Conventional Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Yumi Shiina; Kei Inai; Tatsunori Takahashi; Yamato Shimomiya; Umiko Ishizaki; Kenji Fukushima; Michinobu Nagao
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Merging computational fluid dynamics and 4D Flow MRI using proper orthogonal decomposition and ridge regression.

Authors:  Ali Bakhshinejad; Ahmadreza Baghaie; Alireza Vali; David Saloner; Vitaliy L Rayz; Roshan M D'Souza
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Caval to pulmonary 3D flow distribution in patients with Fontan circulation and impact of potential 4D flow MRI error sources.

Authors:  Kelly Jarvis; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker; Michael Rose; Joshua D Robinson; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Using a Novel In Vitro Fontan Model and Condition-Specific Real-Time MRI Data to Examine Hemodynamic Effects of Respiration and Exercise.

Authors:  Michael Tree; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Phillip M Trusty; Vrishank Raghav; Mark Fogel; Kevin Maher; Ajit Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Zhenglun Wei; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Phillip M Trusty; Connor Huddleston; Yingnan Zhang; Mark A Fogel; Alessandro Veneziani; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Engineering Perspective on Cardiovascular Simulations of Fontan Hemodynamics: Where Do We Stand with a Look Towards Clinical Application.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.495

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.