Literature DB >> 24504064

POP-Q stage I prolapse: is it time to alter our terminology?

Philip Toozs-Hobson1, Steven Swift.   

Abstract

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) staging system revolutionized the way we look at prolapse and gave us a much needed universal objective system that has helped in research and informing patients. The system is now 16 years old, and as our knowledge has increased, so has the realization that this system needs an overhaul in defining stage 1 "prolapse."

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24504064     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-013-2260-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  9 in total

1.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Philip Toozs-Hobson; Robert Freeman; Matthew Barber; Christopher Maher; Bernard Haylen; Stavros Athanasiou; Steven Swift; Kristene Whitmore; Gamal Ghoniem; Dirk de Ridder
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Distribution of pelvic organ support measures in a population-based sample of middle-aged, community-dwelling African American and white women in southeastern Michigan.

Authors:  Elisa R Trowbridge; Nancy H Fultz; Divya A Patel; John O L DeLancey; Dee E Fenner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C V Comiter; S P Vasavada; Z L Barbaric; A E Gousse; S Raz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care.

Authors:  S E Swift
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: the relationship with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse quantification staging system.

Authors:  Marc A Hodroff; Alan H Stolpen; Melody A Denson; Lizann Bolinger; Karl J Kreder
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects.

Authors:  Steven Swift; Patrick Woodman; Amy O'Boyle; Margie Kahn; Michael Valley; Deirdre Bland; Wei Wang; Joe Schaffer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Thomas L Wheeler; Joeseph Schaffer; Zhen Chen; Cathie Spino
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population.

Authors:  Marijke C Ph Slieker-ten Hove; Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Curt W Burger; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-15
  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  A review of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in China.

Authors:  Yi-ting Wang; Jun-ying Jiang; Jin-song Han
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  The POP-Q classification system: looking back and looking forward.

Authors:  Paul Riss; Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The POP-Q system: two decades of progress and debate.

Authors:  Richard C Bump
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a Brazilian population.

Authors:  Wagner Horst; Juliana Barros do Valle; Jean Carl Silva; Carmem Luíza Lucht Gascho
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Apical Vaginal Support: The Often Forgotten Piece of the Puzzle.

Authors:  Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.