Literature DB >> 11832730

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: the relationship with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse quantification staging system.

Marc A Hodroff1, Alan H Stolpen, Melody A Denson, Lizann Bolinger, Karl J Kreder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to determine anatomical correlations with respect to physical examination using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) staging system. In addition, the standard POP staging system was analyzed to obtain normative data and determine any risk factors for prolapse.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 continent women 19 to 67 years old participated in our study. Pelvic MRI was performed at 1.5 Tesla. The vagina, bladder and rectum were opacified. Subjects performed pelvic floor contraction, relaxation and straining maneuvers for T1-weighted imaging. One-way analysis of variance, Fisher's exact test and multinomial logistic regression were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: POP stage is quantified from 0 to IV. Stage was 0 to II in 56%, 27% and 17% of cases. POP stage was not significantly influenced by the number of cesarean sections (p = 0.64) or smoking (p = 0.91) but the number of vaginal deliveries significantly correlated with stage. Women with 1 vaginal delivery were at increased risk for a stage I condition (p = 0.018), whereas those with more than 1 were at increased risk for stage II (p = 0.013). On MRI stages 0 versus I or II differed significantly in regard to bladder descent (p = 0.01 and <0.0001, respectively), while stages 0 versus I differed in regard to levator angle (p = 0.007). No significant staging differences were observed in regard to the posterior urethrovesical angle or stages I versus II with respect to all 3 MRI measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI appears to detect anatomically measurable changes in POP stage 0 versus other stages in regard to bladder descent and the levator angle and yet it is not sensitive enough to detect differences in stages I and II. It is not unusual for continent women to have a moderate degree of pelvic prolapse and previous vaginal delivery appears to increase this risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11832730     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65298-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Differential diagnosis in descending perineum syndrome].

Authors:  O Schwandner; F Poschenrieder; H-B Gehl; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  MRI of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Harpreet K Pannu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: comparing pubococcygeal and midpubic lines with clinical staging.

Authors:  Courtney A Woodfield; Brittany Star Hampton; Vivian Sung; Jeffrey M Brody
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-25

Review 4.  A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-07

5.  Reproducibility of dynamic MR imaging pelvic measurements: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Mark E Lockhart; Julia R Fielding; Holly E Richter; Linda Brubaker; Caryl G Salomon; Wen Ye; Christiane M Hakim; Clifford Y Wai; Alan H Stolpen; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  POP-Q stage I prolapse: is it time to alter our terminology?

Authors:  Philip Toozs-Hobson; Steven Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Imaging in urogynaecology.

Authors:  Alexandros Derpapas; Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu; Ruwan Fernando; Vik Khullar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Pelvic organ support among primiparous women in the first year after childbirth.

Authors:  Victoria L Handa; Ingrid Nygaard; Kimberly Kenton; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Chiara Ghetti; Wen Ye; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-09-24

9.  Radiological evaluation of vaginal width and depth in male-to-female transsexuals by the use of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C Trombetta; G Liguori; S Bucci; L Salamè; G Garaffa; M Cova; E Belgrano
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Magnetic resonance assessment of pelvic anatomy and pelvic floor disorders after childbirth.

Authors:  Victoria L Handa; Mark E Lockhart; Kimberly S Kenton; Catherine S Bradley; Julia R Fielding; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Caryl G Salomon; Christiane Hakim; Wen Ye; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.