Literature DB >> 18455530

Distribution of pelvic organ support measures in a population-based sample of middle-aged, community-dwelling African American and white women in southeastern Michigan.

Elisa R Trowbridge1, Nancy H Fultz, Divya A Patel, John O L DeLancey, Dee E Fenner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report the distribution of pelvic support among a population-based sample of middle-aged community-dwelling women, as defined by pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) and study factors that might influence POP-Q measurements. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a population-based study of community-dwelling, African American and white women aged 35-64 years from southeastern Michigan. Three hundred ninety-four women consented to physical examination using the POP-Q. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and multivariable regression. Estimates were weighted to reflect probability and nonresponse characteristics of the sample to increase generalizability of the findings.
RESULTS: The following values were the mean values for POP-Q points: Aa and Ba = -1.2 cm, C = -6.5 cm (intact uterus), C = -6.9 cm (hysterectomy), and Ap and Bp = -1.8 cm. The POP-Q stages were organized in the following manner: stage 0, 8.8%; stage I, 21.4%; stage II, 67.7%; stage III, 2.1%. Increasing vaginal parity was associated with increasing descent of the anterior, apical, and posterior vaginal wall (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: In this population-based study of women from southeastern Michigan, 90% of the women had anterior and posterior vaginal wall support that was above or extended to the hymen. Increasing vaginal parity was associated with increasing descent of the anterior, posterior, and vaginal apex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18455530      PMCID: PMC2753829          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The status of pelvic supporting organs in a population of iranian women 18 - 68 years of age and possible related factors.

Authors:  Ahia Garshasbi; Soghrat Faghih-Zadeh; Nader Falah
Journal:  Arch Iran Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.354

3.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system.

Authors:  A F Hall; J P Theofrastous; G W Cundiff; R L Harris; L F Hamilton; S E Swift; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Pelvic organ support and prevalence by Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q) in Korean women.

Authors:  Ju Tae Seo; Joo Myung Kim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care.

Authors:  S E Swift
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997.

Authors:  Jeanette S Brown; L Elaine Waetjen; Leslee L Subak; David H Thom; Stephen Van den Eeden; Eric Vittinghoff
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects.

Authors:  Steven Swift; Patrick Woodman; Amy O'Boyle; Margie Kahn; Michael Valley; Deirdre Bland; Wei Wang; Joe Schaffer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors.

Authors:  E C Samuelsson; F T Victor; G Tibblin; K F Svärdsudd
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Catherine Bradley; Debra Brandt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity.

Authors:  Susan L Hendrix; Amanda Clark; Ingrid Nygaard; Aaron Aragaki; Vanessa Barnabei; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.661

  10 in total
  20 in total

1.  Surgery for cystocele III: do all cystoceles involve apical descent? : Observations on cause and effect.

Authors:  John O L Delancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support.

Authors:  Mitchell B Berger; Giselle E Kolenic; Dee E Fenner; Daniel M Morgan; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional model of anterior vaginal wall position at rest and maximal strain in women with and without prolapse.

Authors:  Kindra A Larson; Yvonne Hsu; Luyun Chen; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  POP-Q stage I prolapse: is it time to alter our terminology?

Authors:  Philip Toozs-Hobson; Steven Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  From molecular to macro: the key role of the apical ligaments in uterovaginal support.

Authors:  Caroline Kieserman-Shmokler; Carolyn W Swenson; Luyun Chen; Lisa M Desmond; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Discontinuation rate and adverse events after 1 year of vaginal pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Theerarat Yimphong; Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan; Pranom Buppasiri; Chompilas Chongsomchai; Supparaluck Kanchaiyaphum
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Cardinal and deep uterosacral ligament lines of action: MRI based 3D technique development and preliminary findings in normal women.

Authors:  Luyun Chen; Rajeev Ramanah; Yvonne Hsu; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Levator defects affect perineal position independently of prolapse status.

Authors:  Natalie A Clark; Cynthia A Brincat; Aisha A Yousuf; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Intraoperative cervix location and apical support stiffness in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Tovia M Smith; Jiajia Luo; Giselle E Kolenic; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Self-perceived natural history of pelvic organ prolapse described by women presenting for treatment.

Authors:  Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Rebecca U Margulies; Kindra Larson; Dee E Fenner; Daniel M Morgan; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.