Wagner Horst1,2, Juliana Barros do Valle3, Jean Carl Silva3, Carmem Luíza Lucht Gascho3. 1. Postgraduation program in Health and Environment, University of the Region of Joinville (Univille), Joinville, Brazil. wagner.horst@gmail.com. 2. , Rua Barão do Rio Branco, 207 sala 7, Jaraguá do Sul, Brazil, 89251-400. wagner.horst@gmail.com. 3. Postgraduation program in Health and Environment, University of the Region of Joinville (Univille), Joinville, Brazil.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Although pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition among Brazilians, population-based epidemiological studies of POP are scarce. We studied POP in a population of women undergoing routine examination to determine its prevalence, distribution and relationship to risk factors. METHODS: This quantitative descriptive study surveyed 432 women, based on prolapse prevalence, who sought routine care and were assessed for prolapse staging using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). Demographics, health history, socioeconomic data, symptoms and risk factors for prolapse were self-reported by the participants. RESULTS: A total of 226 (52.3%) of the examined women had POP. The prevalences of POP in relation to stage were as follows: stage 1 (27.8%), stage 2 (23.1%), and stage 3 (1.4%). Regarding risk factors, a history of vaginal delivery (odds ratio, OR, 6.678, 95% confidence interval, CI, 4.16-10.73), delivery of a newborn heavier than 4 kg (OR 2.056, 95% CI 1.19-3.56) and menopausal status (OR 2.793, 95% CI 1.66-4.70) were all associated with a higher risk of prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a majority of the population sample exhibited some degree of prolapse, suggesting that POP deserves substantial clinical attention. The risk factors identified suggest that eventual prolapse may be unavoidable in some women. Public policies should be implemented with respect to modifiable risk factors and antenatal care.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Although pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition among Brazilians, population-based epidemiological studies of POP are scarce. We studied POP in a population of women undergoing routine examination to determine its prevalence, distribution and relationship to risk factors. METHODS: This quantitative descriptive study surveyed 432 women, based on prolapse prevalence, who sought routine care and were assessed for prolapse staging using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). Demographics, health history, socioeconomic data, symptoms and risk factors for prolapse were self-reported by the participants. RESULTS: A total of 226 (52.3%) of the examined women had POP. The prevalences of POP in relation to stage were as follows: stage 1 (27.8%), stage 2 (23.1%), and stage 3 (1.4%). Regarding risk factors, a history of vaginal delivery (odds ratio, OR, 6.678, 95% confidence interval, CI, 4.16-10.73), delivery of a newborn heavier than 4 kg (OR 2.056, 95% CI 1.19-3.56) and menopausal status (OR 2.793, 95% CI 1.66-4.70) were all associated with a higher risk of prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a majority of the population sample exhibited some degree of prolapse, suggesting that POP deserves substantial clinical attention. The risk factors identified suggest that eventual prolapse may be unavoidable in some women. Public policies should be implemented with respect to modifiable risk factors and antenatal care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Epidemiology; POP-Q; Pelvic organ prolapse; Prevalence; Risk factors
Authors: Marian Wiegersma; Chantal M C R Panman; Yvonne Lisman-Van Leeuwen; Janny H Dekker Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Jennifer M Wu; Amie Kawasaki; Andrew F Hundley; Alexis A Dieter; Evan R Myers; Vivian W Sung Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Paula M Maeda; Ana Paula S L Bicudo; Renata T M Watanabe; Thais S M Fonseca; Ricardo P do Souto; César E Fernandes; Emerson de Oliveira Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Date: 2019-04-30