OBJECTIVE: Intracortical brain-computer interface (BCI) decoders are typically retrained daily to maintain stable performance. Self-recalibrating decoders aim to remove the burden this may present in the clinic by training themselves autonomously during normal use but have only been developed for continuous control. Here we address the problem for discrete decoding (classifiers). APPROACH: We recorded threshold crossings from 96-electrode arrays implanted in the motor cortex of two rhesus macaques performing center-out reaches in 7 directions over 41 and 36 separate days spanning 48 and 58 days in total for offline analysis. MAIN RESULTS: We show that for the purposes of developing a self-recalibrating classifier, tuning parameters can be considered as fixed within days and that parameters on the same electrode move up and down together between days. Further, drift is constrained across time, which is reflected in the performance of a standard classifier which does not progressively worsen if it is not retrained daily, though overall performance is reduced by more than 10% compared to a daily retrained classifier. Two novel self-recalibrating classifiers produce a ~15% increase in classification accuracy over that achieved by the non-retrained classifier to nearly recover the performance of the daily retrained classifier. SIGNIFICANCE: We believe that the development of classifiers that require no daily retraining will accelerate the clinical translation of BCI systems. Future work should test these results in a closed-loop setting.
OBJECTIVE: Intracortical brain-computer interface (BCI) decoders are typically retrained daily to maintain stable performance. Self-recalibrating decoders aim to remove the burden this may present in the clinic by training themselves autonomously during normal use but have only been developed for continuous control. Here we address the problem for discrete decoding (classifiers). APPROACH: We recorded threshold crossings from 96-electrode arrays implanted in the motor cortex of two rhesus macaques performing center-out reaches in 7 directions over 41 and 36 separate days spanning 48 and 58 days in total for offline analysis. MAIN RESULTS: We show that for the purposes of developing a self-recalibrating classifier, tuning parameters can be considered as fixed within days and that parameters on the same electrode move up and down together between days. Further, drift is constrained across time, which is reflected in the performance of a standard classifier which does not progressively worsen if it is not retrained daily, though overall performance is reduced by more than 10% compared to a daily retrained classifier. Two novel self-recalibrating classifiers produce a ~15% increase in classification accuracy over that achieved by the non-retrained classifier to nearly recover the performance of the daily retrained classifier. SIGNIFICANCE: We believe that the development of classifiers that require no daily retraining will accelerate the clinical translation of BCI systems. Future work should test these results in a closed-loop setting.
Authors: Vikram Aggarwal; Soumyadipta Acharya; Francesco Tenore; Hyun-Chool Shin; Ralph Etienne-Cummings; Marc H Schieber; Nitish V Thakor Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Beata Jarosiewicz; Steven M Chase; George W Fraser; Meel Velliste; Robert E Kass; Andrew B Schwartz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Leigh R Hochberg; Daniel Bacher; Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; John D Simeral; Joern Vogel; Sami Haddadin; Jie Liu; Sydney S Cash; Patrick van der Smagt; John P Donoghue Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: David M Brandman; Michael C Burkhart; Jessica Kelemen; Brian Franco; Matthew T Harrison; Leigh R Hochberg Journal: Neural Comput Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 2.026
Authors: Chethan Pandarinath; Paul Nuyujukian; Christine H Blabe; Brittany L Sorice; Jad Saab; Francis R Willett; Leigh R Hochberg; Krishna V Shenoy; Jaimie M Henderson Journal: Elife Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Chethan Pandarinath; K Cora Ames; Abigail A Russo; Ali Farshchian; Lee E Miller; Eva L Dyer; Jonathan C Kao Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Beata Jarosiewicz; Anish A Sarma; Jad Saab; Brian Franco; Sydney S Cash; Emad N Eskandar; Leigh R Hochberg Journal: J Physiol Paris Date: 2017-03-08
Authors: Dayo O Adewole; Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Justin C Burrell; Dmitriy Petrov; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen Journal: Crit Rev Biomed Eng Date: 2016
Authors: Alan D Degenhart; William E Bishop; Emily R Oby; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Steven M Chase; Aaron P Batista; Byron M Yu Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 25.671