Literature DB >> 32101491

A neural network for online spike classification that improves decoding accuracy.

Deepa Issar1,2, Ryan C Williamson2,3,4, Sanjeev B Khanna1, Matthew A Smith5,4,6.   

Abstract

Separating neural signals from noise can improve brain-computer interface performance and stability. However, most algorithms for separating neural action potentials from noise are not suitable for use in real time and have shown mixed effects on decoding performance. With the goal of removing noise that impedes online decoding, we sought to automate the intuition of human spike-sorters to operate in real time with an easily tunable parameter governing the stringency with which spike waveforms are classified. We trained an artificial neural network with one hidden layer on neural waveforms that were hand-labeled as either spikes or noise. The network output was a likelihood metric for each waveform it classified, and we tuned the network's stringency by varying the minimum likelihood value for a waveform to be considered a spike. Using the network's labels to exclude noise waveforms, we decoded remembered target location during a memory-guided saccade task from electrode arrays implanted in prefrontal cortex of rhesus macaque monkeys. The network classified waveforms in real time, and its classifications were qualitatively similar to those of a human spike-sorter. Compared with decoding with threshold crossings, in most sessions we improved decoding performance by removing waveforms with low spike likelihood values. Furthermore, decoding with our network's classifications became more beneficial as time since array implantation increased. Our classifier serves as a feasible preprocessing step, with little risk of harm, that could be applied to both off-line neural data analyses and online decoding.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Although there are many spike-sorting methods that isolate well-defined single units, these methods typically involve human intervention and have inconsistent effects on decoding. We used human classified neural waveforms as training data to create an artificial neural network that could be tuned to separate spikes from noise that impaired decoding. We found that this network operated in real time and was suitable for both off-line data processing and online decoding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCI; decoding; neural network; prefrontal cortex; spike-sorting

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32101491      PMCID: PMC7191521          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00641.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  63 in total

1.  Spatial selectivity in human ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Daniel S Rizzuto; Adam N Mamelak; William W Sutherling; Igor Fineman; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-13       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Predicting movement from multiunit activity.

Authors:  Eran Stark; Moshe Abeles
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Recording chronically from the same neurons in awake, behaving primates.

Authors:  Andreas S Tolias; Alexander S Ecker; Athanassios G Siapas; Andreas Hoenselaar; Georgios A Keliris; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Dynamic population coding of category information in inferior temporal and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Ethan M Meyers; David J Freedman; Gabriel Kreiman; Earl K Miller; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Detection, classification, and superposition resolution of action potentials in multiunit single-channel recordings by an on-line real-time neural network.

Authors:  R Chandra; L M Optican
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Single-Trial Decoding of Visual Attention from Local Field Potentials in the Primate Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Is Frequency-Dependent.

Authors:  Sébastien Tremblay; Guillaume Doucet; Florian Pieper; Adam Sachs; Julio Martinez-Trujillo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Accurate Estimation of Neural Population Dynamics without Spike Sorting.

Authors:  Eric M Trautmann; Sergey D Stavisky; Subhaneil Lahiri; Katherine C Ames; Matthew T Kaufman; Daniel J O'Shea; Saurabh Vyas; Xulu Sun; Stephen I Ryu; Surya Ganguli; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Intracortical recording stability in human brain-computer interface users.

Authors:  John E Downey; Nathaniel Schwed; Steven M Chase; Andrew B Schwartz; Jennifer L Collinger
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Sensors and decoding for intracortical brain computer interfaces.

Authors:  Mark L Homer; Arto V Nurmikko; John P Donoghue; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 9.590

10.  Corticostriatal plasticity is necessary for learning intentional neuroprosthetic skills.

Authors:  Aaron C Koralek; Xin Jin; John D Long; Rui M Costa; Jose M Carmena
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  From End to End: Gaining, Sorting, and Employing High-Density Neural Single Unit Recordings.

Authors:  Réka Barbara Bod; János Rokai; Domokos Meszéna; Richárd Fiáth; István Ulbert; Gergely Márton
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Enhancing the decoding accuracy of EEG signals by the introduction of anchored-STFT and adversarial data augmentation method.

Authors:  Omair Ali; Muhammad Saif-Ur-Rehman; Susanne Dyck; Tobias Glasmachers; Ioannis Iossifidis; Christian Klaes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.