Literature DB >> 24502952

Comparisons of preoperative three-dimensional planning and surgical reconstruction in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Hassen Hassani1, Stéphane Cherix1, Eugene T Ek2, Hannes A Rüdiger3.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of important parameters such as femoral offset and torsion is inaccurate, when templating is based on plain x-rays. We evaluate intraoperative reproducibility of pre-operative CT-based 3D-templating in a consecutive series of 50 patients undergoing primary cementless THA through an anterior approach. Pre-operative planning was compared to a postoperative CT scan by image fusion. The implant size was correctly predicted in 100% of the stems, 94% of the cups and 88% of the heads (length). The difference between the planned and the postoperative leg length was 0.3 + 2.3 mm. Values for overall offset, femoral anteversion, cup inclination and anteversion were 1.4 mm ± 3.1, 0.6° ± 3.3°, -0.4° ± 5° and 6.9° ± 11.4°, respectively. This planning allows accurate implant size prediction. Stem position and cup inclination are accurately reproducible.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D templating; anatomical reconstruction; hip reconstruction; preoperative planning; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24502952     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

1.  Usefullness of three-dimensional templating software to quantify the contact state between implant and femur in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Yoshitomo Kajino; Kenji Fujita; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Takashi Yamamoto; Tomoharu Takagi; Takaaki Ohmori; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-11-05

2.  Preoperative digital planning versus postoperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using a calcar-guided short stem: frequent valgization can be avoided.

Authors:  Karl Philipp Kutzner; Joachim Pfeil; Mark Predrag Kovacevic
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-08

3.  The correlation between clinical radiological outcome and contact state of implant and femur using three-dimensional templating software in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Yoshitomo Kajino; Takashi Yamamoto; Tomoharu Takagi; Takaaki Ohmori; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-22

4.  Factors related to disagreement in implant size between preoperative CT-based planning and the actual implants used intraoperatively for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Ogawa; Masaki Takao; Takashi Sakai; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Acetabular positioning is more consistent with the use of a novel miniature computer-assisted device.

Authors:  Ivan Jacob; Jessica Benson; Kate Shanaghan; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Three-dimensional planning-guided total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive direct anterior approach. Clinical outcomes at five years' follow-up.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Yves Catonne; Hugues Pascal-Moussellard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A comparison of peri-operative outcomes between elective and non-elective total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Hiba K Anis; Nipun Sodhi; Marine Coste; Joseph O Ehiorobo; Jared M Newman; Luke J Garbarino; Peter Gold; Benjamin Freund; Nicolas Piuzzi; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-02

8.  Early postoperative clinical recovery of robotic arm-assisted vs. image-based navigated Total hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nao Shibanuma; Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Yutaro Sanada; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda; Shinya Hayashi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Comparison of the accuracy of 2D and 3D templating methods for planning primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Habeeb Bishi; Joshua B V Smith; Vipin Asopa; Richard E Field; Chao Wang; David H Sochart
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-01-11

10.  Variance in predicted cup size by 2-dimensional vs 3-dimensional computerized tomography-based templating in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Feroz A Osmani; Savyasachi Thakkar; Austin Ramme; Ameer Elbuluk; Paul Wojack; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.