Literature DB >> 24501685

Hazard Detection by Drivers with Paracentral Homonymous Field Loss: A Small Case Series.

Bronstad P Matthew, Alex R Bowers, Amanda Albu, Robert B Goldstein, Eli Peli.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Stroke frequently causes homonymous visual field loss. We previously found in a driving simulator that patients with complete homonymous hemianopia had difficulty detecting potential hazards on the side of the field loss. Here we measured the effects of limited paracentral homonymous field loss on detection performance.
METHODS: Three patients with paracentral homonymous scotomas, yet meeting vision requirements for driving in the United States, performed a pedestrian detection task while driving in a simulator. Pedestrians appeared in a variety of potentially hazardous situations on both sides of the road. Three age- and gender-matched control participants with normal vision participated for comparison purposes.
RESULTS: Pedestrians appearing in the scotomatous side of the visual field were less likely to be detected, and when they were, reaction times were longer, frequently too late to respond safely.
CONCLUSIONS: Although legally permitted to drive in the U.S.A., and possibly in other countries, patients with paracentral homonymous field loss may have impaired hazard detection and may benefit from education about their deficit and a fitness-to-drive evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low vision; driver licensing; hemianopsia; quadranopia; quadranopsia; quadrantanopia; sectoranopia

Year:  2011        PMID: 24501685      PMCID: PMC3910664     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Ophthalmol


  10 in total

1.  The visual control of ball interception during human locomotion.

Authors:  A Chardenon; G Montagne; M J Buekers; M Laurent
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Vision and driving: Canada.

Authors:  Payam Yazdan-Ashoori; Martin Ten Hove
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  DLP-based dichoptic vision test system.

Authors:  Russell L Woods; Henry L Apfelbaum; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Drivers' brake reaction times.

Authors:  G Johansson; K Rumar
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases.

Authors:  X Zhang; S Kedar; M J Lynn; N J Newman; V Biousse
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients.

Authors:  E Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth.

Authors:  D Regan; S Kaushal
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Homonymous visual field defects and stroke in an older population.

Authors:  Jagjit Singh Gilhotra; Paul Mitchell; Paul R Healey; Robert G Cumming; Jon Currie
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  On-road driving performance by persons with hemianopia and quadrantanopia.

Authors:  Joanne M Wood; Gerald McGwin; Jennifer Elgin; Michael S Vaphiades; Ronald A Braswell; Dawn K DeCarlo; Lanning B Kline; G Christine Meek; Karen Searcey; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 4.799

  10 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.

Authors:  P Matthew Bronstad; Alex R Bowers; Amanda Albu; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Driving with central field loss III: vehicle control.

Authors:  P Matthew Bronstad; Amanda Albu; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Volume perimetry: measurement in depth of visual field loss.

Authors:  Premnandhini Satgunam; Henry L Apfelbaum; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Impact of high power and angle of incidence on prism corrections for visual field loss.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Jung; Eli Peli
Journal:  Opt Eng       Date:  2014-01-17

6.  Central visual field loss and driving--reply.

Authors:  P Matthew Bronstad; Alex R Bowers; Amanda Albu; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Eli Peli; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Egor Ananyev; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  A pilot evaluation of on-road detection performance by drivers with hemianopia using oblique peripheral prisms.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Mark Tant; Eli Peli
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-20

10.  Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.

Authors:  P Matthew Bronstad; Amanda Albu; Alex R Bowers; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.