P Matthew Bronstad1, Amanda Albu2, Robert Goldstein1, Eli Peli1, Alex R Bowers1. 1. Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visual impairment associated with central field loss may make vehicle control more difficult due to the degraded view of the road. We evaluated how central field loss affects vehicle control in a driving simulator. METHODS: Nineteen participants with binocular central field loss (acuity 6/9 to 6/60) and 15 controls with normal vision drove 10 scenarios, each about eight to 12 minutes. Speed, lane offset and steering wheel reversal rate were measured on straights, left and right curves, along city (approximately 50 km/h) and rural highway (approximately 100 km/h) routes. Following distance was measured on two city straight segments. RESULTS: Subjects with central field loss had higher steering wheel reversal rates (0.55 versus 0.45 reversals per second, p = 0.015), suggesting that the steering task was more demanding for them, requiring more steering corrections; however, they did not differ in other performance measures. Nearly all maintained a safe following distance, although they were more likely than controls with normal vision to lose sight of the lead car in scenarios that required following a car. CONCLUSIONS: Most measures of vehicle control did not significantly differ between participants with central field loss and those with normal vision; however, the higher steering wheel reversal rates suggest that, in compensating for their vision impairment, drivers with central field loss had to allocate extra steering effort to maintain their lane position, which in turn could reduce attentional resources for other driving tasks.
BACKGROUND:Visual impairment associated with central field loss may make vehicle control more difficult due to the degraded view of the road. We evaluated how central field loss affects vehicle control in a driving simulator. METHODS: Nineteen participants with binocular central field loss (acuity 6/9 to 6/60) and 15 controls with normal vision drove 10 scenarios, each about eight to 12 minutes. Speed, lane offset and steering wheel reversal rate were measured on straights, left and right curves, along city (approximately 50 km/h) and rural highway (approximately 100 km/h) routes. Following distance was measured on two city straight segments. RESULTS: Subjects with central field loss had higher steering wheel reversal rates (0.55 versus 0.45 reversals per second, p = 0.015), suggesting that the steering task was more demanding for them, requiring more steering corrections; however, they did not differ in other performance measures. Nearly all maintained a safe following distance, although they were more likely than controls with normal vision to lose sight of the lead car in scenarios that required following a car. CONCLUSIONS: Most measures of vehicle control did not significantly differ between participants with central field loss and those with normal vision; however, the higher steering wheel reversal rates suggest that, in compensating for their vision impairment, drivers with central field loss had to allocate extra steering effort to maintain their lane position, which in turn could reduce attentional resources for other driving tasks.
Authors: Rachael K Raw; Georgios K Kountouriotis; Mark Mon-Williams; Richard M Wilkie Journal: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: David S Friedman; Benita J O'Colmain; Beatriz Muñoz; Sandra C Tomany; Cathy McCarty; Paulus T V M de Jong; Barbara Nemesure; Paul Mitchell; John Kempen Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Rebecca A Deffler; Jing Xu; Ava K Bittner; Alex R Bowers; Shirin E Hassan; Nicole Ross; San-San L Cooley; Aprile Doubt; Frederick H Davidorf; Bradley E Dougherty Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Joanne M Wood; Alex A Black; Kerry Mallon; Anthony S Kwan; Cynthia Owsley Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Xiaolan Tang; P Matthew Bronstad; Amy L Doherty; Mojtaba Moharrer; Eli Peli; Gang Luo; Alex R Bowers Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 3.283