Literature DB >> 22922780

Volume perimetry: measurement in depth of visual field loss.

Premnandhini Satgunam1, Henry L Apfelbaum, Eli Peli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Volume scotomas are three-dimensional regions of space that are not visible to the observer. Volume perimetry maps volume scotomas. Volume scotomas predicted from combining monocular visual fields assume known fixation locus (mainly foveal). However, fixation loci are not always known, especially with central field loss (CFL). Here we demonstrate methods for measuring and calculating volume scotomas and discuss their practical implications.
METHODS: Three patients (bitemporal hemianopia, binasal scotoma, and CFL) were evaluated. Slices through the volume scotomas were measured at three distances: at the plane of fixation, at a plane anterior to fixation (representing anterior volume perimetry), and at a plane posterior to fixation (representing posterior volume perimetry). For anterior volume perimetry, patients fixated on a screen 100 cm away through a beamsplitter that reflected the perimetric stimulus (at 50 cm). For posterior volume perimetry, patients fixated on a near target (50 cm), while perimetric stimuli were presented on a screen 150 cm beyond fixation. At the plane of fixation, monocular visual fields under binocular viewing conditions were measured using a computerized dichoptic perimeter.
RESULTS: Posterior and anterior volume scotomas were documented in patients with bitemporal hemianopia and binasal scotomas, respectively. The CFL patient demonstrated both anterior and posterior volume scotomas. Scotoma magnitude was considered to determine its effect on visual function.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct measurement of volume scotomas can be performed. Anterior and posterior volume visual fields can vary substantially from conventional binocular perimetry measured at the fixation plane, revealing blind areas not otherwise identified. These volume scotomas are likely to impair functional vision such as driving (for bitemporal hemianopes) and near work with small hand tools (for binasal scotomas). Patients with CFL will have impaired functional vision for both distance and near tasks. Consideration of volume scotomas can help provide more effective vision rehabilitation and counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22922780      PMCID: PMC3429708          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182678df8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  DLP-based dichoptic vision test system.

Authors:  Russell L Woods; Henry L Apfelbaum; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Eccentric gaze direction in patients with central field loss.

Authors:  Cornelis A Verezen; Carel B Hoyng; Carina F M Meulendijks; Jan E E Keunen; B Jeroen Klevering
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Extended wearing trial of Trifield lens device for 'tunnel vision'.

Authors:  Russell L Woods; Robert G Giorgi; Eliot L Berson; Eli Peli
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Hazard Detection by Drivers with Paracentral Homonymous Field Loss: A Small Case Series.

Authors:  Bronstad P Matthew; Alex R Bowers; Amanda Albu; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-06

5.  The adaptive significance of the location of the optic disk.

Authors:  A Arditi
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The ocular symptomatology of pituitary tumours.

Authors:  T H Kirkham
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1972-06

7.  Gaze changes with binocular versus monocular viewing in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Stamatina A Kabanarou; Michael D Crossland; Caren Bellmann; Angela Rees; Louise E Culham; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Fixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease.

Authors:  J S Sunness; C A Applegate; D Haselwood; G S Rubin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Association of visual field loss and mobility performance in older adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Kathleen A Turano; Aimee T Broman; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Beatriz Munoz; Gary S Rubin; Shelia West
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance.

Authors:  C A Johnson; J L Keltner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-03
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Field Expansion for Acquired Monocular Vision Using a Multiplexing Prism.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Jung; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  New challenges in low-vision research.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Ian L Bailey; Gislin Dagnelie; Jonathan A Jackson; Gordon E Legge; Gary S Rubin; Joanne Wood
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  A Depth-Dependent Integrated VF Simulation for Analysis and Visualization of Glaucomatous VF Defects.

Authors:  Ping Liu; Allison McKendrick; Anna Ma-Wyatt; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Considering Apical Scotomas, Confusion, and Diplopia When Prescribing Prisms for Homonymous Hemianopia.

Authors:  Henry L Apfelbaum; Nicole C Ross; Alex R Bowers; Eli Peli
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  2017 Charles F. Prentice Award Lecture: Peripheral Prisms for Visual Field Expansion: A Translational Journey.

Authors:  Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.106

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.