Literature DB >> 12431764

The visual control of ball interception during human locomotion.

A Chardenon1, G Montagne, M J Buekers, M Laurent.   

Abstract

According to the required velocity model, on-line modulations of movement acceleration are performed on the basis of an optically specified difference between required and current behavior. Can this model account for observed displacement regulations in an interceptive task requiring locomotive displacements? In the present study, a virtual reality set-up was coupled to a treadmill. Subjects walking on the treadmill were required to intercept a virtual ball approaching at eye-level by adjusting their velocity, if necessary. While the required velocity model could partially account for displacement regulation late in the interception, it was ineffective to explain early regulations. The possible use of a bearing angle strategy to control displacement regulation and the possible degree of complimentarity of these strategies are discussed. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12431764     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01000-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  15 in total

1.  The perceptual control of goal-directed locomotion: a common control architecture for interception and navigation?

Authors:  A Chardenon; G Montagne; M Laurent; R J Bootsma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Synchronizing self and object movement: how child and adult cyclists intercept moving gaps in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Benjamin J Chihak; Jodie M Plumert; Christine J Ziemer; Sabarish Babu; Timofey Grechkin; James F Cremer; Joseph K Kearney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Testing the role of expansion in the prospective control of locomotion.

Authors:  Julien Bastin; David M Jacobs; Antoine H P Morice; Cathy Craig; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Controlling speed and direction during interception: an affordance-based approach.

Authors:  Julien Bastin; Brett R Fajen; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Blind(fold)ed by science: a constant target-heading angle is used in visual and nonvisual pursuit.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Igor Dolgov; Eric McManama; Charles Swank; Andrew B Maynor; Kahlin Kelly; John G Neuhoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

6.  Hazard Detection by Drivers with Paracentral Homonymous Field Loss: A Small Case Series.

Authors:  Bronstad P Matthew; Alex R Bowers; Amanda Albu; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-06

7.  Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.

Authors:  P Matthew Bronstad; Alex R Bowers; Amanda Albu; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Environmental constraints modify the way an interceptive action is controlled.

Authors:  Antoine H P Morice; Matthieu François; David M Jacobs; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perceiving and acting on complex affordances: how children and adults bicycle across two lanes of opposing traffic.

Authors:  Timofey Y Grechkin; Benjamin J Chihak; James F Cremer; Joseph K Kearney; Jodie M Plumert
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Beacon-referenced pursuit for collective motions in three dimensions.

Authors:  Kevin S Galloway; Biswadip Dey
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.