Literature DB >> 26643802

Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis.

Matthew Schiefer1, Daniel Tan, Steven M Sidek, Dustin J Tyler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Tactile feedback is critical to grip and object manipulation. Its absence results in reliance on visual and auditory cues. Our objective was to assess the effect of sensory feedback on task performance in individuals with limb loss. APPROACH: Stimulation of the peripheral nerves using implanted cuff electrodes provided two subjects with sensory feedback with intensity proportional to forces on the thumb, index, and middle fingers of their prosthetic hand during object manipulation. Both subjects perceived the sensation on their phantom hand at locations corresponding to the locations of the forces on the prosthetic hand. A bend sensor measured prosthetic hand span. Hand span modulated the intensity of sensory feedback perceived on the thenar eminence for subject 1 and the middle finger for subject 2. We performed three functional tests with the blindfolded subjects. First, the subject tried to determine whether or not a wooden block had been placed in his prosthetic hand. Second, the subject had to locate and remove magnetic blocks from a metal table. Third, the subject performed the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP). We also measured the subject's sense of embodiment with a survey and his self-confidence. MAIN
RESULTS: Blindfolded performance with sensory feedback was similar to sighted performance in the wooden block and magnetic block tasks. Performance on the SHAP, a measure of hand mechanical function and control, was similar with and without sensory feedback. An embodiment survey showed an improved sense of integration of the prosthesis in self body image with sensory feedback. SIGNIFICANCE: Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improved object discrimination and manipulation, embodiment, and confidence. With both forms of feedback, the blindfolded subjects tended toward results obtained with visual feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26643802      PMCID: PMC5517302          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/1/016001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  43 in total

1.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Colin M Light; Paul H Chappell; Peter J Kyberd
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Functionally selective peripheral nerve stimulation with a flat interface nerve electrode.

Authors:  Dustin J Tyler; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Selective and independent activation of four motor fascicles using a four contact nerve-cuff electrode.

Authors:  Matthew D Tarler; J Thomas Mortimer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control.

Authors:  Paolo M Rossini; Silvestro Micera; Antonella Benvenuto; Jacopo Carpaneto; Giuseppe Cavallo; Luca Citi; Christian Cipriani; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro; Giovanni Di Pino; Florinda Ferreri; Eugenio Guglielmelli; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Stanisa Raspopovic; Jacopo Rigosa; Luca Rossini; Mario Tombini; Paolo Dario
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.

Authors:  Heidi J B Witteveen; Hans S Rietman; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception.

Authors:  Daniel W Tan; Matthew A Schiefer; Michael W Keith; James Robert Anderson; Joyce Tyler; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Discrimination of phantom hand sensations elicited by afferent electrical nerve stimulation in below-elbow amputees.

Authors:  A Anani; L Körner
Journal:  Med Prog Technol       Date:  1979-06-15

8.  Humans can integrate feedback of discrete events in their sensorimotor control of a robotic hand.

Authors:  Christian Cipriani; Jacob L Segil; Francesco Clemente; Richard F ff Weir; Benoni Edin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; D Rogers-Ramachandran
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own.

Authors:  H Henrik Ehrsson; Birgitta Rosén; Anita Stockselius; Christina Ragnö; Peter Köhler; Göran Lundborg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  62 in total

1.  Object stiffness recognition using haptic feedback delivered through transcutaneous proximal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; Henry Shin; He Helen Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Object discrimination using electrotactile feedback.

Authors:  Tapas J Arakeri; Brady A Hasse; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Evaluation of high-density, multi-contact nerve cuffs for activation of grasp muscles in monkeys.

Authors:  N A Brill; S N Naufel; K Polasek; C Ethier; J Cheesborough; S Agnew; L E Miller; D J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Mechanical fatigue resistance of an implantable branched lead system for a distributed set of longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes.

Authors:  A E Pena; S S Kuntaegowdanahalli; J J Abbas; J Patrick; K W Horch; R Jung
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Matthew A Schiefer; Hannes P Saal; Benoit P Delhaye; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Joint-based velocity feedback to virtual limb dynamic perturbations.

Authors:  Eric J Earley; Kyle J Kaveny; Reva E Johnson; Levi J Hargrove; Jon W Sensinger
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2017-07

7.  Translational Approaches to Electrical Stimulation for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Authors:  Seth C Ransom; Shane Shahrestani; Brian V Lien; Ali R Tafreshi; Nolan J Brown; Brian Hanst; Brandon M Lehrich; R Chase Ransom; Ronald Sahyouni
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Benoit P Delhaye; Matthew A Schiefer; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Illusory movement perception improves motor control for prosthetic hands.

Authors:  Paul D Marasco; Jacqueline S Hebert; Jon W Sensinger; Courtney E Shell; Jonathon S Schofield; Zachary C Thumser; Raviraj Nataraj; Dylan T Beckler; Michael R Dawson; Dan H Blustein; Satinder Gill; Brett D Mensh; Rafael Granja-Vazquez; Madeline D Newcomb; Jason P Carey; Beth M Orzell
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 10.  Bionic intrafascicular interfaces for recording and stimulating peripheral nerve fibers.

Authors:  Ranu Jung; James J Abbas; Sathyakumar Kuntaegowdanahalli; Anil K Thota
Journal:  Bioelectron Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.