| Literature DB >> 24499537 |
Travis C Glenn1, Stacey L Lance, Anna M McKee, Bonnie L Webster, Aidan M Emery, Adhemar Zerlotini, Guilherme Oliveira, David Rollinson, Brant C Faircloth.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urogenital schistosomiasis caused by Schistosoma haematobium is widely distributed across Africa and is increasingly being targeted for control. Genome sequences and population genetic parameters can give insight into the potential for population- or species-level drug resistance. Microsatellite DNA loci are genetic markers in wide use by Schistosoma researchers, but there are few primers available for S. haematobium.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24499537 PMCID: PMC3874762 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Sampling details for the six populations of studied
| Senegal | 16°37’00”N/15°01’60”W | NHM3292 | 1995 | Human urine |
| Zanzibar | 05°58’15”S/39°18’29”E | NHM3739 | 1999 | Human urine |
| Malawi | 14°13’60”S/33°33’00”E | NHM880 | 1998 | Unknown |
| Mauritius | 20°09’53”S/57°30’47”E | NHM2576 | 1992 | Human urine |
| Nigeria | 11°57’54”N/08°15’00”E | NHM682 | 1985 | |
| South Africa | 27°00’00”S/32°50’00”E | NHM812 | 1986 | Unknown |
Details for 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed for
| Shae_01 | F: †GCATCCAATTTCGTACAC | AAT | TD60 | 257 - 307 | 65 | 12 |
| | R: *CCACATTAGGCCAACAAG | | | | | |
| Shae_02 | F: *TTAGTGTGTTTGGCTTCAAC | AAT | TD60 | 183 – 225 | 69 | 9 |
| | R: †CCTCGAATGAAATCCTGAC | | | | | |
| Shae_03 | F: †GCTGAGCTTGAGATTG | AAT | TD55 | 291 – 334 | 62 | 15 |
| | R: *CTTCTGTCCCATCGATACC | | | | | |
| Shae_04 | F: †CCCATCGCTGATATTAAAG | AAT | TD65 | 289 – 325 | 70 | 10 |
| | R: *TCTAGTCGTCTTGGGATCC | | | | | |
| Shae_05 | F: *TGTGCACAAGAAAGATTAAATG | AAT | TD65 | 288 – 319 | 68 | 10 |
| | R: †ACGACAATGTTGCAAGTTC | | | | | |
| Shae_06 | F: †GGTGGATTACGCAATAG | AC | TD65 | 333 – 347 | 67 | 8 |
| | R: *TTTAATCAACCGGGTGTC | | | | | |
| Shae_07 | F: *TCCAAGCACCATTATCAAG | AAT | TD65 | 315 – 330 | 66 | 6 |
| | R: †ACGGAAACTTGTTGAAATG | | | | | |
| Shae_08 | F: *CTAAACTGGCAAGATTTC | AAT | TD65 | 299 – 330 | 68 | 11 |
| | R: †CAACGTGCCTTTATTTC | | | | | |
| Shae_09 | F: †GGGATGTATGCAGACTTG | AAT | TD65 | 213 – 256 | 68 | 13 |
| | R: *TTGTTTGGCTGCAGTAAC | | | | | |
| Shae_10 | F: †CGCATGTCATACCTATCTCC | AAT | TD65 | 198 – 213 | 69 | 6 |
| | R: *GCTTATCAGGCCTATCTCC | | | | | |
| Shae_11 | F: *TTGGTTTAGAAATTACATCACC | ATC | TD65 | 207 – 222 | 66 | 5 |
| | R: †CCAACAATATTAATGGACAGC | | | | | |
| Shae_12 | F: †CGTCTTAGTGAGCCAGATG | AAC | TD65 | 257 – 278 | 68 | 6 |
| | R: *CTCGTGGACATCATCAG | | | | | |
| Shae_13 | F: *GAGCAGCTATTTCGTATCG | AAT | TD60 | 183 – 225 | 69 | 12 |
| | R: †ACCGTGGACAGTTCATCAG | | | | | |
| Shae_14 | F: *GTCCTCCTTCCCTCTTTG | ACTC | TD65 | 210 – 254 | 67 | 10 |
| | R: †CACATTCGTCCTAGATATCG | | | | | |
| Shae_15 | F: *CTTTCAGTAGGATTTGTTG | ATC | TD65 | 300 – 322 | 67 | 9 |
| R: †CGACGTCAAGCACTGTAC |
* indicates CAG tag (5′- CAGTCGGGCGTCATCA-3′).
† indicates pigtail (5′- GTTT-3′).
The annealing temperature (T ) where TD65, TD60, and TD55 indicates touchdown protocols with a highest annealing temperature of 65°C, 60°C, and 55°C, respectively; size indicates the range of sequenced alleles in base pairs plus the length of the CAG tag; the number of individuals genotyped out of 72 is N; is the number of alleles observed.
Figure 1Locations of population samples. Vertical bars represent allelic richness, and horizontal bars represent heterozygosity (see Table 1 for location details).
Summary of genetic variation at 15 microsatellite loci in 6 populations of
| Senegal | 12 | 0.51 ±0.06 | 0.51 ±0.04 | 3.3 | 7 | -0.01 |
| Zanzibar | 12 | 0.70 ±0.04 | 0.63 ±0.04 | 5.7 | 18 | 0.10 |
| Malawi | 10 | 0.60 ±0.07 | 0.65 ±0.04 | 3.9 | 8 | -0.08 |
| Mauritius | 11 | 0.62 ±0.04 | 0.65 ±0.04 | 4.1 | 6 | -0.06 |
| Nigeria | 12 | 0.58 ±0.06 | 0.58 ±0.04 | 4.4 | 7 | 0.01 |
| South Africa | 12 | 0.06 ±0.04 | 0.06 ±0.02 | 1.3 | 3 | -0.02 |
N is the sample size (number of adult S. haematobium genotyped, DNA from 6 males and 6 females was sampled), HE is the expected heterozygosity (calculated as Nei’s unbiased gene diversity (Nei, 1987)) ± the inter-locus standard deviation, HO is the observed heterozygosity ± the interlocus standard deviation, A is the mean number of alleles, P is the number of private alleles, and FIS is the Weir and Cockerham (1984) estimate for inbreeding.
Pairwise differentiation among populations of
| Senegal | | 0.41 | 0.64 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.73 |
| Zanzibar | 0.27 | | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.33 | 0.53 |
| Malawi | 0.36 | 0.17 | | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.33 |
| Mauritius | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.22 | | 0.30 | 0.51 |
| Nigeria | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.20 | | 0.44 |
| South Africa | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.49 |
FST values are below diagonal (all P-values ≤ 0.001) and pairwise harmonic mean Dest values are above diagonal.
Summary statistics of 15 microsatellite loci screened in 6 populations of
| Shae_01 | 0.22 | 0 | 4 | 6.9 | 9 | 2 |
| Shae_02 | 0.37 | 2 | 7 | 6.4 | 23 | 8 |
| Shae_03 | 0.30 | 0 | 6 | 7.6 | 12 | 3 |
| Shae_04 | 0.25 | 0 | 4 | 7.0 | 9 | 2 |
| Shae_05 | 0.36 | 0 | 3 | 6.8 | 15 | 6 |
| Shae_06 | 0.42 | 0 | 4 | 5.6 | 22 | 7 |
| Shae_07 | 0.44 | 1 | 8 | 4.5 | 32 | 12 |
| Shae_08 | 0.28 | 0 | 4 | 8.2 | 8 | 1 |
| Shae_09 | 0.34 | 2 | 5 | 6.8 | 16 | 5 |
| Shae_10 | 0.36 | 2 | 7 | 4.7 | 27 | 10 |
| Shae_11 | 0.49 | 0 | 10 | 3.5 | 36 | 14 |
| Shae_12 | 0.61 | 1 | 7 | 4.5 | 35 | 13 |
| Shae_13 | 0.43 | 0 | 10 | 5.4 | 29 | 11 |
| Shae_14 | 0.21 | 0 | 5 | 6.3 | 13 | 4 |
| Shae_15 | 0.59 | 0 | 3 | 5.4 | 27 | 9 |
PI is the probability of identity, the number of populations with expected null alleles present, the number of populations with non-significant (p > 0.001)FST values (significance determined by G-based exact test), A is the mean number of alleles, Score is determined from rank-sum of desirable characteristics (e.g., allelic diversity, lack of predicted null alleles, etc.; see text for details), Rank of Usefulness is the rank order for loci based on Score (lowest Score and rank is best), loci with the same rank indicate loci with identical rank sums.
Figure 2Microsatellite motifs of . Distribution of Repeat Types. Pattern of genetic diversity as measured with newly developed microsatellite DNA markers.