| Literature DB >> 25796359 |
Krystyna Cwiklinski1, Katherine Allen2, James LaCourse3, Diana J Williams2, Steve Paterson4, Jane E Hodgkinson2.
Abstract
The liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica is an economically important pathogen of sheep and cattle and has been described by the WHO as a re-emerging zoonosis. Control is heavily reliant on the use of drugs, particularly triclabendazole and as a result resistance has now emerged. The population structure of F. hepatica is not well known, yet it can impact on host-parasite interactions and parasite control with drugs, particularly regarding the spread of triclabendazole resistance. We have identified 2448 potential microsatellites from 83 Mb of F. hepatica genome sequence using msatfinder. Thirty-five loci were developed and optimised for microsatellite PCR, resulting in a panel of 15 polymorphic loci, with a range of three to 15 alleles. This panel was validated on genomic DNA from 46 adult F. hepatica; 38 liver flukes sourced from a Northwest abattoir, UK and 8 liver flukes from an established isolate (Shrewsbury; Ridgeway Research). Evidence for null alleles was found at four loci (Fh_1, Fh_8, Fh_13 and Fh_14), which showed markedly higher levels of homozygosity than the remaining 11 loci. Of the 38 liver flukes isolated from cattle livers (n=10) at the abattoir, 37 genotypes were identified. Using a multiplex approach all 15 loci could be amplified from several life cycle stages that typically yield low amounts of DNA, including metacercariae, the infective life cycle stage present on pasture, highlighting the utility of this multiplex microsatellite panel. This study reports the largest panel of microsatellite markers available to date for population studies of F. hepatica and the first multiplex panel of microsatellite markers that can be used for several life cycle stages.Entities:
Keywords: Fasciola; Microsatellite; Next generation sequencing; Population structure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25796359 PMCID: PMC4424948 DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.03.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Genet Evol ISSN: 1567-1348 Impact factor: 3.342
Primer sequences and properties of F. hepatica (Fh) microsatellite alleles for the modified Schuelke’s method.
| Locus | Primer sequence (5′–3′) | Dye | No. PCR cycles | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult DNA template | Other DNA templates | ||||
| Fh_1 | F: 5′- | VIC | 55 | 25 | 45 |
| Fh_2 | F: 5′- | VIC | 57 | 25 | 45 |
| Fh_3 | F: 5′- | PET | 58 | 25 | 45 |
| Fh_4 | F: 5′- | PET | 59 | 25 | / |
| Fh_5 | F: 5′- | 6-FAM | 57 | 25 | / |
| Fh_6 | F: 5′- | 6-FAM | 55 | 25 | / |
| Fh_7 | F: 5′- | 6-FAM | 57 | 25 | 45 |
| Fh_8 | F: 5′- | NED | 57 | 25 | / |
| Fh-9 | F: 5′- | PET | 58 | 25 | / |
| Fh_10 | F: 5′- | NED | 57 | 25 | / |
| Fh_11 | F: 5′- | PET | 57 | 25 | / |
| Fh_12 | F: 5′- | VIC | 60 | 25 | 50 |
| Fh_13 | F: 5′- | PET | 55 | 25 | 50 |
| Fh_14 | F: 5′- | NED | 57 | 25 | 50 |
| Fh_15 | F: 5′- | NED | 55 | 25 | 55 |
Primer sequence: sequence underlined represents the M13 sequence tag. Ta: annealing temperature for PCR.
Loci that can be consistently amplified from egg, miracida and metacercariae DNA.
DNA extracted from egg, miracida and metacercariae life cycle stages.
Statistical analysis of the 15 F. hepatica microsatellite loci.
| Locus | Repeat motif | Locus size (bp) | No. of alleles | Allele size range (bp) | HW | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fh_1 | TTTG | 201 | 4 | 200–224 | 0.564 | 0.196 | ||
| Fh_2 | TTGA | 213 | 16 | 200–356 | 0.826 | 0.733 | 0.087 | 0.134 |
| Fh_3 | AAAC | 196 | 5 | 195–219 | 0.655 | 0.651 | −0.030 | 0.088 |
| Fh_4 | TAA | 186 | 13 | 178–214 | 0.859 | 0.739 | 0.140 | 0.002 |
| Fh_5 | ACT | 159 | 15 | 166–338 | 0.850 | 0.800 | 0.057 | 0.071 |
| Fh_6 | TAT | 180 | 15 | 193–265 | 0.861 | 0.913 | −0.061 | 0.486 |
| Fh_7 | TAT | 177 | 13 | 178–259 | 0.759 | 0.698 | 0.081 | 0.593 |
| Fh_8 | ATA | 167 | 11 | 180–213 | 0.821 | 0.533 | ||
| Fh-9 | GTT | 203 | 3 | 210–225 | 0.332 | 0.400 | −0.117 | 0.032 |
| Fh_10 | TAA | 217 | 12 | 215–251 | 0.790 | 0.891 | −0.130 | 0.210 |
| Fh_11 | ATA | 211 | 14 | 209–254 | 0.877 | 0.711 | 0.191 | 0.000 |
| Fh_12 | ATC | 215 | 8 | 219–258 | 0.705 | 0.652 | 0.075 | 0.921 |
| Fh_13 | CAT | 192 | 4 | 202–226 | 0.648 | 0.444 | 0.327 | 0.002 |
| Fh_14 | AAT | 201 | 10 | 202–238 | 0.808 | 0.318 | ||
| Fh_15 | TATG | 206 | 7 | 213–277 | 0.598 | 0.630 | −0.071 | 0.002 |
Locus size: represents the size of the locus found in the F. hepatica genomic sequence data using msatfinder. HE: expected heterozygosity and HO: observed heterozygosity; calculated using GENETIX. FIS: inbreeding coefficient, according to Weir and Cockerham (1984) and HW: Fisher’s exact test for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, P < 0.00005 after Bonferroni’s adjustment; calculated using GENEPOP. In bold are the three loci that significantly deviate from HWE following Bonferroni's adjustment (P < 0.00005).
Not significant after Bonferroni’s adjustment (0.0002).
Location of microsatellite loci within the draft F. hepatica genome⁎.
| Loci | Location in draft genome (ENA scaffold number) | Size of scaffold/bp |
|---|---|---|
| Fh_1 | LN629046 | 119,809 |
| Fh_2 | LN627942 | 830,113 |
| Fh_3 | LN627685 | 203,809 |
| Fh_4 | LN627551 | 495,632 |
| Fh_5 | LN627876 | 548,152 |
| Fh_6 | LN629193 | 178,014 |
| Fh_7 | LN635535 | 32,950 |
| Fh_8 | LN629482 | 110,497 |
| Fh_9 | LN628826 | 266,251 |
| Fh_10 | LN628015 | 227,781 |
| Fh_11 | LN629076 | 121,942 |
| Fh_12 | LN628360 | 220,783 |
| Fh_13 | LN630045 | 119,190 |
| Fh_14 | LN628821 | 190,238 |
| Fh_15 | LN627509 | 452,066 |
Cwiklinski et al., in press. Data are freely available from the European Nucleotide Archive under accessions LN627018-LN647175 (assembly data), PRJEB6687 (genomic read data).
Genotypic linkage disequilibrium for the nine F. hepatica microsatellite loci where null alleles were not identified.
| Fh pairs | |
|---|---|
| Fh_2 & Fh_6 | 0.000000 |
| Fh_2 & Fh_7 | 0.000000 |
| Fh_2 & Fh_10 | 0.000054 |
| Fh_2 & Fh_12 | 0.000000 |
| Fh_3 & Fh_6 | 0.000000 |
| Fh_3 & Fh_10 | 0.000005 |
| Fh_3 & Fh_12 | 0.001212 |
| Fh_5 & Fh_6 | 0.000118 |
| Fh_5 & Fh_7 | 0.000000 |
| Fh_5 & Fh_10 | 0.000724 |
| Fh_5 & Fh_12 | 0.001220 |
| Fh_6 & Fh_10 | 0.000000 |
| Fh_6 & Fh_12 | 0.000000 |
| Fh_10 & Fh_12 | 0.000095 |
P < 0.05 following Bonferroni’s adjustment = P < 0.0014238.