| Literature DB >> 24499297 |
Yao Zhang, Li Bao, Jin Lu, Kai-Yan Liu, Jin-Lan Li, Ya-Zhen Qin, Huan Chen, Ling-Di Li, Yuan Kong, Hong-Xia Shi, Yue-Yun Lai, Yan-Rong Liu, Bin Jiang, Shan-Shan Chen, Xiao-Jun Huang1, Guo-Rui Ruan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer-testis (CT) antigen genes might promote the progression of multiple myeloma (MM). CT antigens may act as diagnostic and prognostic markers in MM, but their expression levels and clinical implications in this disease are not fully understood. This study measured the expression levels of four CT antigen genes in Chinese patients with MM and explored their clinical implications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24499297 PMCID: PMC3922338 DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cancer ISSN: 1476-4598 Impact factor: 27.401
The percentage of patients with positive expression and co-expression of the four CT antigens in patients with multiple myeloma
| Newly diagnosed patients (n = 78) | 69 (88.5%) | 60 (76.9%) | 64 (82.1%) | 20 (25.6%) | 72 (92.3%) |
| In remission (n = 113) | 76 (67.3%) | 51 (45.1%) | 52 (46.0%) | 12 (10.6%) | 90 (79.6%) |
| Non-responders (n = 53) | 43 (81.1%) | 42 (79.2%) | 43 (81.1%) | 17 (32.1%) | 52 (98.1%) |
| Relapsed patients (n = 12) | 10 (83.3%) | 9 (75.0%) | 9 (75.0%) | 7 (58.3%) | 10 (83.3%) |
| *p-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| | |||||
| Newly diagnosed patients (n = 78) | 6 (7.7%) | 4 (5.1%) | 14 (17.9%) | 35 (44.9%) | 19 (24.4%) |
| In remission (n = 113) | 23 (20.4%) | 32 (28.3%) | 22(19.5%) | 27 (23.9%) | 9 (8.0%) |
| Non-responders (n = 53) | 1 (2.1%) | 9 (16.7%) | 6 (10.4%) | 23 (43.8%) | 14 (27.1%) |
| Relapsed patients (n = 12) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (20.0%) | 3 (20.0%) | 7 (60.0%) |
| *p-value | <0.01 | 0.01 | 0.42 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
*p-values compared with newly diagnosed patients, patients in remission and those that were non-responders to treatment using the chi-square test.
Correlation of the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with MM with the expression of CT antigens
| Age (years) | | | p = 0.36 | p = 0.07 | p = 0.35 | p = 0.19 |
| | <60 | 84 | 81.0 | 64.3 | 71.4 | 29.8 |
| | 60 | 86.7 | 78.3 | 78.3 | 20.0 | |
| Sex | | | p = 0.94 | p = 0.09 | p = 0.57 | p = 0.06 |
| | Male | 95 | 83.2 | 74.7 | 75.8 | 30.5 |
| | Female | 49 | 83.7 | 61.2 | 71.4 | 16.3 |
| ISS staging | | | p = 0.19 | p = 0.02* | p = 0.97 | p = 0.12 |
| | I | 21 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 81.0 | 14.3 |
| | II | 42 | 95.2 | 66.7 | 78.6 | 23.8 |
| | III | 61 | 83.6 | 85.2 | 78.7 | 36.1 |
| | Unknown | 20 | | | | |
| BM-infiltrating plasma cells | | | p < 0.01* | p < 0.01* | p < 0.01* | p = 0.03* |
| | <10% | 64 | 73.4 | 50.0 | 54.7 | 17.2 |
| | ≥10% | 78 | 91.0 | 87.2 | 91.0 | 33.3 |
| | Unknown | 2 | | | | |
| β2-microglobulin (mg/L) | | | p = 0.19 | p = 0.01* | p = 0.12 | p = 0.52 |
| | <3.5 | 37 | 75.7 | 59.5 | 67.6 | 24.3 |
| | ≥3.5 | 83 | 85.5 | 80.7 | 80.7 | 30.1 |
| Unknown | 24 |
*A significant association as analyzed by the chi-square test.
Correlation of cytogenetic characteristics with CT antigen expression
| Level (Positive percentage) | Level (Positive percentage) | Level (Positive percentage) | Level (Positive percentage) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Del(13q14) | | | p < 0.01* (0.03*) | p = 0.03* (0.10) | p = 0.01* (0.20) | p = 0.25(0.15) |
| | No | 44 | 214.94 ± 830.59(72.7) | 8.26 ± 27.53(65.9) | 2.50 ± 8.54(70.5) | 0.06 ± 0.22(15.9) |
| | Yes | 30 | 443.20 ± 838.11(93.3) | 36.85 ± 127.23(83.3) | 23.77 ± 98.61(83.3) | 0.02 ± 0.06(30.0) |
| 1q21 | | | p = 0.13(0.68) | p = 0.11(0.10) | p = 0.02* (0.87) | p = 0.19(0.15) |
| | No | 44 | 207.45 ± 644.43(79.5) | 6.89 ± 24.76(65.9) | 0.60 ± 1.41(75.0) | 0.04 ± 0.19(15.9) |
| | Yes | 30 | 454.18 ± 1050.80(83.3) | 38.86 ± 127.58(83.3) | 26.56 ± 98.45(76.7) | 0.04 ± 0.14(30.0) |
| Del(17p13) | | | p = 0.85(0.59) | p = 0.69(1.00) | p = 0.38(1.00) | p = 0.19(0.33) |
| | No | 68 | 327.33 ± 868.73(79.4) | 21.57 ± 87.60(72.1) | 12.08 ± 66.07(75.0) | 0.05 ± 0.18(23.5) |
| | Yes | 6 | 82.53 ± 118.21(100.0) | 0.31 ± 0.53(83.3) | 0.32 ± 0.74(83.3) | 0.00 ± 0.00(0) |
| 14q32 | | | p = 0.79(0.94) | p = 0.67(0.05) | p = 0.68(0.42) | p = 0.74(0.86) |
| | No | 31 | 251.88 ± 645.46(80.60) | 34.07 ± 125.46(61.30) | 20.45 ± 95.93(71.00) | 0.08 ± 0.26(22.60) |
| | Yes | 43 | 347.56 ± 954.95(81.40) | 9.60 ± 28.30(81.40) | 4.40 ± 17.23(79.10) | 0.02 ± 0.07(20.90) |
| Del(13q14.3) | | | p = 0.04* (0.07) | p = 0.18(0.27) | p = 0.21(0.45) | p = 0.22(0.16) |
| | No | 48 | 233.06 ± 815.48(75.00) | 7.71 ± 26.40(68.80) | 2.62 ± 8.19(72.90) | 0.05 ± 0.21(16.70) |
| Yes | 26 | 444.86 ± 870.69(92.30) | 42.25 ± 136.20(80.80) | 26.83 ± 105.86(80.80) | 0.02 ± 0.06(30.80) | |
Figure 1CT antigen expression levels correlate with the clinical course of multiple myeloma. The expression levels of MAGE-C1/CT7 (A), MAGE-A3 (B) and MAGE-C2/CT10 (C) increased in eight patients who did not respond to treatment and showed non-remission courses with time. (D, E, F) The expression levels of the three CT antigen genes were reduced in 11 patients who responded to treatment. (G, H, I) Four patients with de novo disease experienced partial remission and then disease progression; the expression levels of the three CT antigen genes fell and then rose in two patients, while the other two patients showed increased expression levels before the disease progressed at later time points. (J, K, L) The expression levels of the three CT antigen genes were reduced or negative in 13 patients after auto-HSCT. In three patients who relapsed after auto-HSCT, one had an increased expression level of MAGE-A3, and the other two had increased expression levels of all three genes.