Literature DB >> 30117173

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in Chinese population: A prospective epidemiological study.

Ling Ma1, Shuang Xu1, Jianhua Qu2, Jian Hou3, Yang Wang4, Lei Wen1, Yang Liu1, Ying Kang1, Ming Jiang2, Weijun Fu3, Juan Du3, Lin Zhou3, Xiaojun Huang1, Zhaoxia Zhang5, Jin Lu1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) in different groups of age and the clinical features in China. This multicenter prospective study enrolled 1797 health subjects. The overall prevalence of MGUS was 2.73%. The prevalence of different age groups was 1.19% (41-50 y), 1.16% (51-60 y), 2.19% (61-70 y), 3.66% (71-80 y), and 7.76% (≥81 y). The prevalence of MGUS in male (n = 843) was 2.97%, while the prevalence of MGUS in female (n = 952) was 2.52%, but this difference of the two groups was not statistically significant. As for subtype of MGUS, IgG subtype was 55.1% (27 cases), IgA subtype was 14.3%, and IgM subtype was 12.2%. The M protein of one case became negative after 3 months, and the others remained positive without obvious disease transformation (follow-up duration: 3-7 mo). Thus, the prevalence of MGUS in China was similar to that in Mexican Americans, but lower than that in the other Asian country, American Whites, American Blacks, and Africans, and had a trend of increase with age. Male had higher prevalence of MGUS in China. The most common subtype was IgG.
© 2018 The Authors Hematological Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  M protein; monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30117173      PMCID: PMC6585751          DOI: 10.1002/hon.2548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0278-0232            Impact factor:   5.271


INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a premalignant disorder caused by the monoclonal immunoglobulin or its fragment, which is secreted by cloned B cells or plasma cells, without features of related malignant disorders such as multiple myeloma, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, primary amyloidosis, B‐cell lymphoma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is defined by serum monoclonal protein concentration <30 g/L, clonal plasma cells <10% in the bone marrow, and absence of end‐organ damage (eg, anemia, lytic bone lesions, renal insufficiency, or hypercalcemia associated with the proliferation of the clonal plasma cells).1 The prevalence of MGUS ranges from 0.7% to 5.8%, and significantly increases with age.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 The prevalence and type of immunoglobulin may be different between different races.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15 All multiple myeloma (MM) cases were preceded by MGUS.16 Lu et al showed that most of newly diagnosed Chinese patients with MM were Durie‐Salmon stage or ISS stage III, with higher tumor load and poorer prognosis.17 Therefore, an epidemiological study of MGUS will help us to early diagnose MM. This is the first multicenter prospective study aiming to identify the prevalence of MGUS in different groups of age, the type of abnormal M protein, and the difference in China mainland.

METHODS

Population

Subjects with physical examination (age ≥ 40 y) visiting Peking University People's Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University First Affiliated Hospital and Second Military Medical University Affiliated Chang Zheng Hospital from April 2017 to August 2017 and signed informed consent were included in this study. The research was approved by the People's Hospital of Peking University (approval number: 2017PHB005‐01).

Sample and measurement

Firstly, positive samples were screened through serum protein electrophoresis and verified by immunofixation electrophoresis and then referral to the hematologic clinic to collect medical history (ie, family history, hepatitis, and other major diseases history). All subjects completed tests, including blood routine, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, blood lipid, glucose, N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide, cardiac trolonin I, serum free light‐chain assays, serum M protein quantitative, urine free light‐chain quantitative or urine M protein quantitative or 24 hours urine protein quantitative, bone marrow examination (ie, morphology, flow immunological typing, fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH], and chromosome G‐banding), imaging test (ie, cranial pelvis X‐ray, cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral vertebral magnetic resonance imaging or PET‐CT). Subjects with MM, amyloidosis, POEMS, and lymphoma were excluded. Once subjects were diagnosed as MGUS, they were followed up and examined with blood and urine tests once every 3 months as well as bone marrow puncture once every year. Subsequent follow‐up duration could be extended to 6 months if the M protein was unchanged within 1 year (ie, 10%). If the disease progression was identified in subjects, it should be registered and reported. Imaging examinations were conducted if necessary based on the decision of researchers. The serum protein electrophoresis was conducted with Sebia Capillarys 2 electrophoresis apparatus. Urine immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) was conducted through fully automatic agarose gel electrophoresis apparatus (Sebia Hydrasys 2 electrophoresis apparatus, French Sebia company), using five kinds of antiserum for serum IFE (ie, gamma heavy chain γ [IgG], heavy chain α [IgA], heavy chain μ [IgM], anti‐kappa light chain [free or not free], and anti‐lambda light chain [free or not free]) and five antibodies (ie, the triad antibody of heavy chain γ [IgG], heavy chain α [IgA] and heavy chain μ [IgM], the anti‐free kappa light chain, anti‐free lambda light chain, anti‐kappa light chain [free or not free], and anti‐lambda light chain [free or not free]).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS 22.0 software. Describe analysis was used for the positive rates and classifications of MGUS. Chi‐square test, t test, and Fisher exact test were used to compare rates, and the level of significance was set at P values <0.05. Based on the prevalence of the South Korea,18 the calculated sample size number of 41 to 50 years, 51 to 60 years, 61 to 70 years, 71 to 80 years, and 80 or higher years in China was 299, 295, 292, 315, and 323, while the total sample size was 1524.

RESULTS

Methodology validation

Data of 1797 health examination populations from a multicenter were collected. Firstly, 321 serum samples were used to screen through capillary electrophoresis and serum immunofixation electrophoresis. Eight cases were verified to be positive by the both methods with the positive rate of 2.49%. Only one case was negative by capillary electrophoresis, but positive by serum immunofixation electrophoresis. For capillary electrophoresis, the miss detection rate was only 0.32% with short test time, which can be used for batch screening. Therefore, capillary electrophoresis was used for follow‐up screening.

Prevalence and distribution

Among 1797 cases, 49 cases were diagnosed as MGUS. The overall prevalence was 2.73%. The prevalence in different age groups was 1.19% (41‐50 y), 1.16% (51‐60 y), 2.19% (61‐70 y), 3.66% (71‐80 y), and 7.76% (≥81 y) separately. The prevalence of male cases (n = 843) was 2.97%, while the prevalence of female cases (n = 952) was 2.52%, but this difference of the two groups was not statistically significant (Table 1 and Figure 1). Among 49 cases with evidence of MGUS, 55.1% (n = 27) was IgG subtype, 12.2% was IgM subtype, and 14.3% was IgA subtype. Four cases (8.2%) were kappa light chain subtype and 5 cases (10.2%) were lambda light chain subtype (Figure 2).
Table 1

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance prevalence according to age group and sex

Age, yMena Womena P valueTotala
41‐503/183 (1.63)1/153 (0.65)0.7454/336 (1.19)
51‐601/154 (0.65)3/188 (1.60)0.6304/342 (1.16)
61‐706/239 (2.51)6/309 (1.93)0.65212/548 (2.19)
71‐806/150 (4.00)6/178 (3.37)0.77012/328 (3.66)
>809/117 (7.69)8/126 (6.34)0.68217/243 (7.00)
Total25/843 (2.97)24/954 (2.52)0.55949/1797 (2.73)

The number was presented as number/total number (%).

Figure 1

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance prevalence in patients with different age and gender

Figure 2

MP types in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients in different age groups

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance prevalence according to age group and sex The number was presented as number/total number (%). Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance prevalence in patients with different age and gender MP types in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients in different age groups

Bone marrow

Data from a total of 49 cases that were collected showed that the average of bone marrow plasmacyte were 3.4%. Forty‐one cases received the chromosome G‐banding, and five cases (12.2%) were abnormal, which were 45 (X, −Y); t (6;11) (p11;q23); t (7;11); 47, XXX; 47, XX, +2, respectively. The FISH was done in 35 patients, the positive rate was 22.8% (eight cases), including five cases were IgH rearrangement, one case was 1 q21 amplification, two cases were RB1 deletion and D13S319 deletion (7.5%). In which of the five cases, only one case continued to be done IgH translocations including t (11;14), t (4;14), t (14;16), and was found t (11;14). Real‐time quantitative PCR was used to detect the MAGE‐C1/CT7 gene (reference gene ABL) in 28 patients, the positive rate was 78.6% (median: 0.37%, range: 0.01 to 24.69%).

Follow‐up

The M protein of one case became negative after 3 months, and the others remained positive without obvious disease transformation (follow‐up duration: 3‐7 mo).

DISCUSSION

Patients with MGUS were always asymptomatic, and the majority of patients were identified with the change of immunoglobulin at annual physical examination or visit due to other illnesses and then diagnosed based on serum protein electrophoresis, serum immunofixation electrophoresis, and free light chain. Since the false dismissal rate was high, MGUS can be easily ignored by the clinicians. Therefore, the actual rate of MGUS was much higher than the data. The prevalence of MGUS was variable across the world (0.7%‐5.8%),2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 which may be associated with the difference of race, location, and environment. The prevalence of MGUS in American blacks2, 3, 14, 15 and Africans4 was more than twice as whites, while the data in Nagasaki City of Japan5 and Thailand6 showed that their prevalence of MGUS was similar to the whites. Through the NHANES study, Landgren et al2 suggested that in the United States, the prevalence of MGUS was significantly higher in blacks (3.67%) compared with whites (2.33%) or Mexican Americans (1.75%). Recently, Landgren et al3 also found that the prevalence of the United States in 40 to 49 age groups was 0.88%, and among the blacks, the whites, and Mexican Americans, the data was 3.26%, 0.53% and 2.2%, respectively. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance prevalence in Hong Kong13 was 0.8%, and most of the subtypes were IgG, but the age of their studying object was 50 to 65 years; it was not comparable with the other previous studies. Our study showed that on the Chinese mainland, the prevalence of MGUS over the age of 50 was 3.08%, and the data in the group of 41 to 50 years was 1.19%. The data were higher than that in Japan and South Korea,18 which may be associated with the different detection method. As the positive rate of MGUS by capillary electrophoresis was nearly twice than by agarose gel electrophoresis,19 the prevalence in China was similar to that in Mexican Americans, but lower than that in the other Asian country (Japan 2.1%, Thailand 2.3%), American whites(2.33%), American blacks(3.67%), and Africans(5.84%).2, 3, 4, 5, 6 The positive rate was different by different detection methods. In a large study in Olmsted County, Kyle and his colleagues analyzed more than 75% of residents (50 y or older), using agarose gel electrophoresis test, and identified 3.2% of subjects with MGUS. There was a significant age‐dependent increase with the prevalence among persons aged 70 years or older (up to 5.3%).7 Subsequently, Dispenzieri and his colleagues used the free light‐chain assay on a majority of the same people and showed a higher prevalence of MGUS in people aged more than 50 (4.2%).8 An Italian study19 by means of capillary electrophoresis showed that the prevalence of MGUS increased from 3.2% to 6%, which nearly doubled than that previous report. Our study used capillary electrophoresis and found that the prevalence of MGUS over 40 years old was 2.73%, which was lower than that in Italy. This may be related to ethnic differences. Our data also verified that the men had a higher prevalence (2.97%‐2.52%) in China, which was consistent with previous report in the United States (2.8%‐2.0%).2 The data from Mayo Clinic showed that the most common subtype of MGUS was IgG (69%), followed by IgM type (17%) and IgA type (11%).7 However, the IgA type in Korea18 was the most common subtype (43%), followed by IgG (29%) and IgM (19%). Our data were similar to that of Mayo Clinic, which showed that the most common subtype of IgG was 55.1%, but followed by IgA type (14.3%). Due to the heavy air pollution in China, there may be different types of distribution, such as the IgA type, which was slightly higher than that in Europe and the United States. The prevalence of IgA nephropathy in China is significantly higher than that of other countries, which may be related to the environmental pollution.20 Our study showed that the IgM type was 12.2%, which was lower than that of other countries without significant descending. There were fewer plasma cells and lower cell proliferation in bone marrow of MGUS; hence, the conventional karyotype analysis was always normal in majority of patients. However, with the emergence of the more sensitive methods, people found that the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was not uncommon. Bacher et al21 found that the abnormality rate of iFISH in 302 patients with MGUS was 56% (median application of 11 probe), among which the incidence of 13q deletion was 22.1%, 17p deletion was 2.2%, and t (11;14), t (4;14), t (14;16) was 18.7%, 1.9%, and 1.1%, respectively. Fonseca et al22 confirmed that 46% of MGUS had IgH rearrangement. Our data showed that the abnormal rate by the chromosome G‐banding was 12.2%, and by the iFISH detection, the abnormal rate increased to 22.8%, including positive rate of IgH rearrangement was 14.2%, lower than that Ulrike had reported, which may be related to the less probes in our center currently (five to eight). The MAGE‐C1/CT7 gene was specific for the malignant plasmacyte diseases. Our center has reported23 that the positive rate of MAGE‐C1/CT7 was 88.5% in the newly diagnosis of MM (median: 443.2%). Our study found that the positive rate in patients with MGUS was 78.6%, but the expression level was 0.37%, lower than that of MM patients. Most of the patients with MGUS were “asymptomatic,” although this could last for a long time and was initially considered as a “benign” monoclonal gammopathy. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance could evolve into a malignant monoclonal gammopathy in a few years, such as lymphoma and MM. A prospective study16 in 2009 identified 71 subjects who developed MM with traceable serum using assays for monoclonal proteins and kappa‐lambda free light chains and more than half of them had monoclonal immunoglobulin abnormalities prior to MM diagnosis. Until now MM was considered to be evolved from MGUS. Therefore, the investigation of MGUS (the early state of MM) would help us understand the pathogenesis of MM. The annual transformation probability of MGUS to active MM was 1% followed by 30% of progression at 25 years of follow‐up. Kyle24 reported that among the 1384 cases of MGUS in Mayo Clinic, 11% of patients eventually developed into MM, Non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma, primary amyloidosis, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and plasmacytoma. During long‐term follow‐up, 10% of patients progressed in 10 years later followed by 18% in 20 years, 28% in 30 years later, 36% in 35 years later, and 36% in 40 years later, suggesting that 1% of patients with MGUS developed into malignant disease in each year; 11% of the patients died of MGUS progression. Other studies also found that 12% to 17% of patients had progression at the 10 years of follow‐up followed by 25% to 34% of progression in 20 years.25, 26, 27 In our study, the follow‐up duration was short without progression, but the monoclonal immunoglobulin of one case was missing during follow‐up period. Further study with longer follow‐up time was still warrant to examine MGUS. In conclusion, the prevalence of MGUS in China was similar to that in Mexican Americans, but lower than that in the other Asian country, American whites, American blacks, and Africans, which had a trend of increase with age. Male had higher prevalence of MGUS in China. The most common subtype was IgG. With the gradual increase of life expectancy in China, the screening and regular monitoring of MGUS were relevant.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
  28 in total

1.  Incidental finding of monoclonal gammopathy in blood donors: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Massimo La Raja; Monica Barcobello; Nicola Bet; Paolo Dolfini; Marina Florean; Federica Tomasella; Vincenzo De Angelis; Luca Mascaretti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Prevalence and risk of progression of light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri; Jerry A Katzmann; Robert A Kyle; Dirk R Larson; L Joseph Melton; Colin L Colby; Terry M Therneau; Raynell Clark; Shaji K Kumar; Arthur Bradwell; Rafael Fonseca; D F Jelinek; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  MGUS prevalence in an ethnically Chinese population in Hong Kong.

Authors:  S Peter Wu; Alex Minter; Rene Costello; Adriana Zingone; Cheuk-Kwong Lee; Wing-Yan Au; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Frequency of pathological proteins (M-components) om 6,995 sera from an adult population.

Authors:  U Axelsson; R Bachmann; J Hällén
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1966-02

5.  Increased incidence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in blacks and its age-related differences with whites on the basis of a study of 397 men and one woman in a hospital setting.

Authors:  J Singh; A W Dudley; K A Kulig
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1990-12

6.  The natural history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. A 5- to 20-year follow-up of 263 cases.

Authors:  P Pasqualetti; V Festuccia; A Collacciani; R Casale
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.195

7.  Genomic abnormalities in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Richard J Bailey; Gregory J Ahmann; S Vincent Rajkumar; James D Hoyer; John A Lust; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Gordon W Dewald
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution and Increased Risk of Membranous Nephropathy in China.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Guobao Wang; Nan Chen; Tao Lu; Sheng Nie; Gang Xu; Ping Zhang; Yang Luo; Yongping Wang; Xiaobin Wang; Joel Schwartz; Jian Geng; Fan Fan Hou
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Five-Year Follow-up Study of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance in a Korean Elderly Urban Cohort.

Authors:  Yun-Gyoo Lee; Soo-Mee Bang; Jeong-Ok Lee; Jin Won Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Jung Han Song; Tae-Hee Kim; Ki Woong Kim; Jong-Seok Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  The clinical value of the quantitative detection of four cancer-testis antigen genes in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Yao Zhang; Li Bao; Jin Lu; Kai-Yan Liu; Jin-Lan Li; Ya-Zhen Qin; Huan Chen; Ling-Di Li; Yuan Kong; Hong-Xia Shi; Yue-Yun Lai; Yan-Rong Liu; Bin Jiang; Shan-Shan Chen; Xiao-Jun Huang; Guo-Rui Ruan
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 27.401

View more
  1 in total

1.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in Chinese population: A prospective epidemiological study.

Authors:  Ling Ma; Shuang Xu; Jianhua Qu; Jian Hou; Yang Wang; Lei Wen; Yang Liu; Ying Kang; Ming Jiang; Weijun Fu; Juan Du; Lin Zhou; Xiaojun Huang; Zhaoxia Zhang; Jin Lu
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.271

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.