| Literature DB >> 30117173 |
Ling Ma1, Shuang Xu1, Jianhua Qu2, Jian Hou3, Yang Wang4, Lei Wen1, Yang Liu1, Ying Kang1, Ming Jiang2, Weijun Fu3, Juan Du3, Lin Zhou3, Xiaojun Huang1, Zhaoxia Zhang5, Jin Lu1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) in different groups of age and the clinical features in China. This multicenter prospective study enrolled 1797 health subjects. The overall prevalence of MGUS was 2.73%. The prevalence of different age groups was 1.19% (41-50 y), 1.16% (51-60 y), 2.19% (61-70 y), 3.66% (71-80 y), and 7.76% (≥81 y). The prevalence of MGUS in male (n = 843) was 2.97%, while the prevalence of MGUS in female (n = 952) was 2.52%, but this difference of the two groups was not statistically significant. As for subtype of MGUS, IgG subtype was 55.1% (27 cases), IgA subtype was 14.3%, and IgM subtype was 12.2%. The M protein of one case became negative after 3 months, and the others remained positive without obvious disease transformation (follow-up duration: 3-7 mo). Thus, the prevalence of MGUS in China was similar to that in Mexican Americans, but lower than that in the other Asian country, American Whites, American Blacks, and Africans, and had a trend of increase with age. Male had higher prevalence of MGUS in China. The most common subtype was IgG.Entities:
Keywords: M protein; monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; prevalence
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30117173 PMCID: PMC6585751 DOI: 10.1002/hon.2548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hematol Oncol ISSN: 0278-0232 Impact factor: 5.271
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance prevalence according to age group and sex
| Age, y | Men | Women |
| Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41‐50 | 3/183 (1.63) | 1/153 (0.65) | 0.745 | 4/336 (1.19) |
| 51‐60 | 1/154 (0.65) | 3/188 (1.60) | 0.630 | 4/342 (1.16) |
| 61‐70 | 6/239 (2.51) | 6/309 (1.93) | 0.652 | 12/548 (2.19) |
| 71‐80 | 6/150 (4.00) | 6/178 (3.37) | 0.770 | 12/328 (3.66) |
| >80 | 9/117 (7.69) | 8/126 (6.34) | 0.682 | 17/243 (7.00) |
| Total | 25/843 (2.97) | 24/954 (2.52) | 0.559 | 49/1797 (2.73) |
The number was presented as number/total number (%).
Figure 1Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance prevalence in patients with different age and gender
Figure 2MP types in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients in different age groups