| Literature DB >> 24497959 |
Xing Liu1, Junlian Zhang2, Tianyu Gu3, Wenming Zhang1, Qirong Shen4, Shixue Yin3, Huizhen Qiu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have focused on linking soil community structure, diversity, or specific taxa to disturbances. Relatively little attention has been directed to crop monoculture soils, particularly potato monoculture. Information about microbial community changes over time between monoculture and non-monoculture treatments is lacking. Furthermore, few studies have examined microbial communities in potato monoculture soils using a high throughput pyrosequencing approach. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24497959 PMCID: PMC3907449 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086610
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Overall fungal (A) and bacterial (B) communities in the soil samples along a year-gradient of potato monoculture.
Pie charts show the average relative abundance over 18 samples. OTUs were assigned at the 97% identity level, based on which the H Shannon and S Chao1 indices were calculated, which are shown by graphs. Phylogenetic lineages of bacteria were assigned by phylum/subphylum and of fungi by order or higher levels. ARA stands for average relative abundance. The “unidentified fungus” is a taxon able to be assigned to kingdom Fungi but unable to any lower taxon.
Figure 2The change of potato yield, disease incidence and Fusarium abundance over the years of potato monoculture.
Disease incidences shown in this figure were measured at harvest time.
Figure 3The correlations between Fusarium abundances and soil variables.
Correlation coefficient between abundance of microbial taxa and the year of monoculturea.
| Taxa | Average RA (%) | Pearson | Kendall | Spearman |
|
| 30.4 | −0.550* | −0.424* | −0.561* |
|
| 10.9 | 0.369* | 0.486* | |
|
| 7.1 | 0.524* | 0.466** | 0.649** |
|
| 3.3 | −0.554* | −0.452* | −0.561* |
|
| 2.6 | 0.618** | 0.424* | 0.567* |
| JL-ETNP-Z39 | 2.4 | 0.706** | 0.522** | 0.680** |
| β | 0.9 | −0.500* | −0.369* | −0.505* |
RA is relative abundances. * and ** represent significance level at <0.05 and <0.01 respectively. The taxa with average relative abundance over 18 samples <0.5% and with significance level >0.05 were not shown.
Figure 4Regressions between bacterial taxa abundances and the year of potato monoculture.
Figure 5Regressions between relative abundance of Fusarium and bacterial taxa.
Regressions with p values >0.05 are not shown.