Literature DB >> 24496601

Implementation of statistical process control for proteomic experiments via LC MS/MS.

Michael S Bereman1, Richard Johnson, James Bollinger, Yuval Boss, Nick Shulman, Brendan MacLean, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Michael J MacCoss.   

Abstract

Statistical process control (SPC) is a robust set of tools that aids in the visualization, detection, and identification of assignable causes of variation in any process that creates products, services, or information. A tool has been developed termed Statistical Process Control in Proteomics (SProCoP) which implements aspects of SPC (e.g., control charts and Pareto analysis) into the Skyline proteomics software. It monitors five quality control metrics in a shotgun or targeted proteomic workflow. None of these metrics require peptide identification. The source code, written in the R statistical language, runs directly from the Skyline interface, which supports the use of raw data files from several of the mass spectrometry vendors. It provides real time evaluation of the chromatographic performance (e.g., retention time reproducibility, peak asymmetry, and resolution), and mass spectrometric performance (targeted peptide ion intensity and mass measurement accuracy for high resolving power instruments) via control charts. Thresholds are experiment- and instrument-specific and are determined empirically from user-defined quality control standards that enable the separation of random noise and systematic error. Finally, Pareto analysis provides a summary of performance metrics and guides the user to metrics with high variance. The utility of these charts to evaluate proteomic experiments is illustrated in two case studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24496601      PMCID: PMC4020592          DOI: 10.1007/s13361-013-0824-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  31 in total

1.  Comparative analysis to guide quality improvements in proteomics.

Authors:  Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Annette Michalski; Juergen Cox; Matthias Mann
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments.

Authors:  Brendan MacLean; Daniela M Tomazela; Nicholas Shulman; Matthew Chambers; Gregory L Finney; Barbara Frewen; Randall Kern; David L Tabb; Daniel C Liebler; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Quality control in LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Thomas Köcher; Peter Pichler; Remco Swart; Karl Mechtler
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Performance characteristics of a new hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometer (TripleTOF 5600).

Authors:  Genna L Andrews; Brigitte L Simons; J Bryce Young; Adam M Hawkridge; David C Muddiman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Improvements to the percolator algorithm for Peptide identification from shotgun proteomics data sets.

Authors:  Marina Spivak; Jason Weston; Léon Bottou; Lukas Käll; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Paul A Rudnick; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Amy-Joan L Ham; David M Bunk; Lisa E Kilpatrick; Dean D Billheimer; Ronald K Blackman; Helene L Cardasis; Steven A Carr; Karl R Clauser; Jacob D Jaffe; Kevin A Kowalski; Thomas A Neubert; Fred E Regnier; Birgit Schilling; Tony J Tegeler; Mu Wang; Pei Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lisa J Zimmerman; Susan J Fisher; Bradford W Gibson; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Henry Rodriguez; Stephen E Stein; Paul Tempst; Amanda G Paulovich; Daniel C Liebler; Cliff Spiegelman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Post analysis data acquisition for the iterative MS/MS sampling of proteomics mixtures.

Authors:  Michael R Hoopmann; Gennifer E Merrihew; Priska D von Haller; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Deep and highly sensitive proteome coverage by LC-MS/MS without prefractionation.

Authors:  Suman S Thakur; Tamar Geiger; Bhaswati Chatterjee; Peter Bandilla; Florian Fröhlich; Juergen Cox; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Performance metrics for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry systems in proteomics analyses.

Authors:  Paul A Rudnick; Karl R Clauser; Lisa E Kilpatrick; Dmitrii V Tchekhovskoi; Pedatsur Neta; Niksa Blonder; Dean D Billheimer; Ronald K Blackman; David M Bunk; Helene L Cardasis; Amy-Joan L Ham; Jacob D Jaffe; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Birgit Schilling; David L Tabb; Tony J Tegeler; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Mu Wang; Pei Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lisa J Zimmerman; Steven A Carr; Susan J Fisher; Bradford W Gibson; Amanda G Paulovich; Fred E Regnier; Henry Rodriguez; Cliff Spiegelman; Paul Tempst; Daniel C Liebler; Stephen E Stein
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  12 in total

1.  MSstatsQC: Longitudinal System Suitability Monitoring and Quality Control for Targeted Proteomic Experiments.

Authors:  Eralp Dogu; Sara Mohammad-Taheri; Susan E Abbatiello; Michael S Bereman; Brendan MacLean; Birgit Schilling; Olga Vitek
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Multiplexed peptide analysis using data-independent acquisition and Skyline.

Authors:  Jarrett D Egertson; Brendan MacLean; Richard Johnson; Yue Xuan; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Methods for Proteomic Analyses of Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Carolina Mehaffy; Megan Lucas; Nicole A Kruh-Garcia; Karen M Dobos
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Multiplexed, Scheduled, High-Resolution Parallel Reaction Monitoring on a Full Scan QqTOF Instrument with Integrated Data-Dependent and Targeted Mass Spectrometric Workflows.

Authors:  Birgit Schilling; Brendan MacLean; Jason M Held; Alexandria K Sahu; Matthew J Rardin; Dylan J Sorensen; Theodore Peters; Alan J Wolfe; Christie L Hunter; Michael J MacCoss; Bradford W Gibson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Exposure to BMAA mirrors molecular processes linked to neurodegenerative disease.

Authors:  Joshua Beri; Tara Nash; Rubia M Martin; Michael S Bereman
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  The Skyline ecosystem: Informatics for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics.

Authors:  Lindsay K Pino; Brian C Searle; James G Bollinger; Brook Nunn; Brendan MacLean; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 10.946

7.  An Automated Pipeline to Monitor System Performance in Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomic Experiments.

Authors:  Michael S Bereman; Joshua Beri; Vagisha Sharma; Cory Nathe; Josh Eckels; Brendan MacLean; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Toxicoproteomic analysis of pulmonary carbon nanotube exposure using LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Gina M Hilton; Alexia J Taylor; Christina D McClure; Gregory N Parsons; James C Bonner; Michael S Bereman
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Quality Control Analysis in Real-time (QC-ART): A Tool for Real-time Quality Control Assessment of Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics Data.

Authors:  Bryan A Stanfill; Ernesto S Nakayasu; Lisa M Bramer; Allison M Thompson; Charles K Ansong; Therese R Clauss; Marina A Gritsenko; Matthew E Monroe; Ronald J Moore; Daniel J Orton; Paul D Piehowski; Athena A Schepmoes; Richard D Smith; Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; Thomas O Metz
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 7.381

Review 10.  Proteogenomic convergence for understanding cancer pathways and networks.

Authors:  Emily S Boja; Henry Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.