Literature DB >> 19921851

Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

David L Tabb1, Lorenzo Vega-Montoto, Paul A Rudnick, Asokan Mulayath Variyath, Amy-Joan L Ham, David M Bunk, Lisa E Kilpatrick, Dean D Billheimer, Ronald K Blackman, Helene L Cardasis, Steven A Carr, Karl R Clauser, Jacob D Jaffe, Kevin A Kowalski, Thomas A Neubert, Fred E Regnier, Birgit Schilling, Tony J Tegeler, Mu Wang, Pei Wang, Jeffrey R Whiteaker, Lisa J Zimmerman, Susan J Fisher, Bradford W Gibson, Christopher R Kinsinger, Mehdi Mesri, Henry Rodriguez, Stephen E Stein, Paul Tempst, Amanda G Paulovich, Daniel C Liebler, Cliff Spiegelman.   

Abstract

The complexity of proteomic instrumentation for LC-MS/MS introduces many possible sources of variability. Data-dependent sampling of peptides constitutes a stochastic element at the heart of discovery proteomics. Although this variation impacts the identification of peptides, proteomic identifications are far from completely random. In this study, we analyzed interlaboratory data sets from the NCI Clinical Proteomic Technology Assessment for Cancer to examine repeatability and reproducibility in peptide and protein identifications. Included data spanned 144 LC-MS/MS experiments on four Thermo LTQ and four Orbitrap instruments. Samples included yeast lysate, the NCI-20 defined dynamic range protein mix, and the Sigma UPS 1 defined equimolar protein mix. Some of our findings reinforced conventional wisdom, such as repeatability and reproducibility being higher for proteins than for peptides. Most lessons from the data, however, were more subtle. Orbitraps proved capable of higher repeatability and reproducibility, but aberrant performance occasionally erased these gains. Even the simplest protein digestions yielded more peptide ions than LC-MS/MS could identify during a single experiment. We observed that peptide lists from pairs of technical replicates overlapped by 35-60%, giving a range for peptide-level repeatability in these experiments. Sample complexity did not appear to affect peptide identification repeatability, even as numbers of identified spectra changed by an order of magnitude. Statistical analysis of protein spectral counts revealed greater stability across technical replicates for Orbitraps, making them superior to LTQ instruments for biomarker candidate discovery. The most repeatable peptides were those corresponding to conventional tryptic cleavage sites, those that produced intense MS signals, and those that resulted from proteins generating many distinct peptides. Reproducibility among different instruments of the same type lagged behind repeatability of technical replicates on a single instrument by several percent. These findings reinforce the importance of evaluating repeatability as a fundamental characteristic of analytical technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19921851      PMCID: PMC2818771          DOI: 10.1021/pr9006365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  31 in total

1.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Reproducibility of quantitative proteomic analyses of complex biological mixtures by multidimensional protein identification technology.

Authors:  Michael P Washburn; Ryan R Ulaszek; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  A method for reducing the time required to match protein sequences with tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Robertson Craig; Ronald C Beavis
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Hongbin Liu; Rovshan G Sadygov; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Improving reproducibility and sensitivity in identifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Katheryn A Resing; Karen Meyer-Arendt; Alex M Mendoza; Lauren D Aveline-Wolf; Karen R Jonscher; Kevin G Pierce; William M Old; Hiu T Cheung; Steven Russell; Joy L Wattawa; Geoff R Goehle; Robin D Knight; Natalie G Ahn
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  The ABC's (and XYZ's) of peptide sequencing.

Authors:  Hanno Steen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Standardizing global gene expression analysis between laboratories and across platforms.

Authors:  Theodore Bammler; Richard P Beyer; Sanchita Bhattacharya; Gary A Boorman; Abee Boyles; Blair U Bradford; Roger E Bumgarner; Pierre R Bushel; Kabir Chaturvedi; Dongseok Choi; Michael L Cunningham; Shibing Deng; Holly K Dressman; Rickie D Fannin; Fredrico M Farin; Jonathan H Freedman; Rebecca C Fry; Angel Harper; Michael C Humble; Patrick Hurban; Terrance J Kavanagh; William K Kaufmann; Kathleen F Kerr; Li Jing; Jodi A Lapidus; Michael R Lasarev; Jianying Li; Yi-Ju Li; Edward K Lobenhofer; Xinfang Lu; Renae L Malek; Sean Milton; Srinivasa R Nagalla; Jean P O'malley; Valerie S Palmer; Patrick Pattee; Richard S Paules; Charles M Perou; Ken Phillips; Li-Xuan Qin; Yang Qiu; Sean D Quigley; Matthew Rodland; Ivan Rusyn; Leona D Samson; David A Schwartz; Yan Shi; Jung-Lim Shin; Stella O Sieber; Susan Slifer; Marcy C Speer; Peter S Spencer; Dean I Sproles; James A Swenberg; William A Suk; Robert C Sullivan; Ru Tian; Raymond W Tennant; Signe A Todd; Charles J Tucker; Bennett Van Houten; Brenda K Weis; Shirley Xuan; Helmut Zarbl
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 8.  Multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT): technical overview of a profiling method optimized for the comprehensive proteomic investigation of normal and diseased heart tissue.

Authors:  Thomas Kislinger; Anthony O Gramolini; David H MacLennan; Andrew Emili
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Interlaboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC-MS platform performance.

Authors:  Amanda G Paulovich; Dean Billheimer; Amy-Joan L Ham; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Paul A Rudnick; David L Tabb; Pei Wang; Ronald K Blackman; David M Bunk; Helene L Cardasis; Karl R Clauser; Christopher R Kinsinger; Birgit Schilling; Tony J Tegeler; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Mu Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lisa J Zimmerman; David Fenyo; Steven A Carr; Susan J Fisher; Bradford W Gibson; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Fred E Regnier; Henry Rodriguez; Cliff Spiegelman; Stephen E Stein; Paul Tempst; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  198 in total

1.  One-step sample concentration, purification, and albumin depletion method for urinary proteomics.

Authors:  Ali R Vaezzadeh; Andrew C Briscoe; Hanno Steen; Richard S Lee
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  15N-labeled brain enables quantification of proteome and phosphoproteome in cultured primary neurons.

Authors:  Lujian Liao; Richard C Sando; John B Farnum; Peter W Vanderklish; Anton Maximov; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  LogViewer: a software tool to visualize quality control parameters to optimize proteomics experiments using Orbitrap and LTQ-FT mass spectrometers.

Authors:  Michael J Sweredoski; Geoffrey T Smith; Anastasia Kalli; Robert L J Graham; Sonja Hess
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2011-12

4.  Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam Principles).

Authors:  Christopher R Kinsinger; James Apffel; Mark Baker; Xiaopeng Bian; Christoph H Borchers; Ralph Bradshaw; Mi-Youn Brusniak; Daniel W Chan; Eric W Deutsch; Bruno Domon; Jeff Gorman; Rudolf Grimm; William Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; David Horn; Christie Hunter; Patrik Kolar; Hans-Joachim Kraus; Hanno Langen; Rune Linding; Robert L Moritz; Gilbert S Omenn; Ron Orlando; Akhilesh Pandey; Peipei Ping; Amir Rahbar; Robert Rivers; Sean L Seymour; Richard J Simpson; Douglas Slotta; Richard D Smith; Stephen E Stein; David L Tabb; Danilo Tagle; John R Yates; Henry Rodriguez
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 5.  Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.

Authors:  Paola Picotti; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time.

Authors:  Tommy Nilsson; Matthias Mann; Ruedi Aebersold; John R Yates; Amos Bairoch; John J M Bergeron
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Relative, label-free protein quantitation: spectral counting error statistics from nine replicate MudPIT samples.

Authors:  Bret Cooper; Jian Feng; Wesley M Garrett
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy.

Authors:  Bruno Domon; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Generating and navigating proteome maps using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Christian H Ahrens; Erich Brunner; Ermir Qeli; Konrad Basler; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 10.  Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective.

Authors:  Parag Mallick; Bernhard Kuster
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.