Literature DB >> 29666158

Quality Control Analysis in Real-time (QC-ART): A Tool for Real-time Quality Control Assessment of Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics Data.

Bryan A Stanfill1, Ernesto S Nakayasu2, Lisa M Bramer1, Allison M Thompson3, Charles K Ansong2, Therese R Clauss2, Marina A Gritsenko2, Matthew E Monroe2, Ronald J Moore2, Daniel J Orton2, Paul D Piehowski2, Athena A Schepmoes2, Richard D Smith2, Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson4, Thomas O Metz5.   

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based proteomics studies of large sample cohorts can easily require from months to years to complete. Acquiring consistent, high-quality data in such large-scale studies is challenging because of normal variations in instrumentation performance over time, as well as artifacts introduced by the samples themselves, such as those because of collection, storage and processing. Existing quality control methods for proteomics data primarily focus on post-hoc analysis to remove low-quality data that would degrade downstream statistics; they are not designed to evaluate the data in near real-time, which would allow for interventions as soon as deviations in data quality are detected. In addition to flagging analyses that demonstrate outlier behavior, evaluating how the data structure changes over time can aide in understanding typical instrument performance or identify issues such as a degradation in data quality because of the need for instrument cleaning and/or re-calibration. To address this gap for proteomics, we developed Quality Control Analysis in Real-Time (QC-ART), a tool for evaluating data as they are acquired to dynamically flag potential issues with instrument performance or sample quality. QC-ART has similar accuracy as standard post-hoc analysis methods with the additional benefit of real-time analysis. We demonstrate the utility and performance of QC-ART in identifying deviations in data quality because of both instrument and sample issues in near real-time for LC-MS-based plasma proteomics analyses of a sample subset of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young cohort. We also present a case where QC-ART facilitated the identification of oxidative modifications, which are often underappreciated in proteomic experiments.
© 2018 Stanfill et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29666158      PMCID: PMC6126382          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   7.381


  25 in total

1.  Proteomics Quality Control: Quality Control Software for MaxQuant Results.

Authors:  Chris Bielow; Guido Mastrobuoni; Stefan Kempa
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization.

Authors:  Sean A Beausoleil; Judit Villén; Scott A Gerber; John Rush; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09-10       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Metriculator: quality assessment for mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Ryan M Taylor; Jamison Dance; Russ J Taylor; John T Prince
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Quality control in LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Thomas Köcher; Peter Pichler; Remco Swart; Karl Mechtler
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Clinical proteomics: A need to define the field and to begin to set adequate standards.

Authors:  Harald Mischak; Rolf Apweiler; Rosamonde E Banks; Mark Conaway; Joshua Coon; Anna Dominiczak; Jochen H H Ehrich; Danilo Fliser; Mark Girolami; Henning Hermjakob; Denis Hochstrasser; Joachim Jankowski; Bruce A Julian; Walter Kolch; Ziad A Massy; Christian Neusuess; Jan Novak; Karlheinz Peter; Kasper Rossing; Joost Schanstra; O John Semmes; Dan Theodorescu; Visith Thongboonkerd; Eva M Weissinger; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Tadashi Yamamoto
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Sources of technical variability in quantitative LC-MS proteomics: human brain tissue sample analysis.

Authors:  Paul D Piehowski; Vladislav A Petyuk; Daniel J Orton; Fang Xie; Ronald J Moore; Manuel Ramirez-Restrepo; Anzhelika Engel; Andrew P Lieberman; Roger L Albin; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Amanda J Myers
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  SIMPATIQCO: a server-based software suite which facilitates monitoring the time course of LC-MS performance metrics on Orbitrap instruments.

Authors:  Peter Pichler; Michael Mazanek; Frederico Dusberger; Lisa Weilnböck; Christian G Huber; Christoph Stingl; Theo M Luider; Werner L Straube; Thomas Köcher; Karl Mechtler
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Improved quality control processing of peptide-centric LC-MS proteomics data.

Authors:  Melissa M Matzke; Katrina M Waters; Thomas O Metz; Jon M Jacobs; Amy C Sims; Ralph S Baric; Joel G Pounds; Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Signatures for mass spectrometry data quality.

Authors:  Brett G Amidan; Daniel J Orton; Brian L Lamarche; Matthew E Monroe; Ronald J Moore; Alexander M Venzin; Richard D Smith; Landon H Sego; Mark F Tardiff; Samuel H Payne
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  MS-GF+ makes progress towards a universal database search tool for proteomics.

Authors:  Sangtae Kim; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  11 in total

1.  Virtual Issue: Technological Innovations.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Gingras; Steven A Carr; Alma L Burlingame
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Longitudinal proteomics analysis in the immediate microenvironment of islet allografts during progression of rejection.

Authors:  Oscar Alcazar; Luis F Hernandez; Ernesto S Nakayasu; Paul D Piehowski; Charles Ansong; Midhat H Abdulreda; Peter Buchwald
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  Molecular networks in Network Medicine: Development and applications.

Authors:  Edwin K Silverman; Harald H H W Schmidt; Eleni Anastasiadou; Lucia Altucci; Marco Angelini; Lina Badimon; Jean-Luc Balligand; Giuditta Benincasa; Giovambattista Capasso; Federica Conte; Antonella Di Costanzo; Lorenzo Farina; Giulia Fiscon; Laurent Gatto; Michele Gentili; Joseph Loscalzo; Cinzia Marchese; Claudio Napoli; Paola Paci; Manuela Petti; John Quackenbush; Paolo Tieri; Davide Viggiano; Gemma Vilahur; Kimberly Glass; Jan Baumbach
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2020-04-19

4.  Rapidly Assessing the Quality of Targeted Proteomics Experiments through Monitoring Stable-Isotope Labeled Standards.

Authors:  Bryson C Gibbons; Thomas L Fillmore; Yuqian Gao; Ronald J Moore; Tao Liu; Ernesto S Nakayasu; Thomas O Metz; Samuel H Payne
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Tutorial: best practices and considerations for mass-spectrometry-based protein biomarker discovery and validation.

Authors:  Ernesto S Nakayasu; Marina Gritsenko; Paul D Piehowski; Yuqian Gao; Daniel J Orton; Athena A Schepmoes; Thomas L Fillmore; Brigitte I Frohnert; Marian Rewers; Jeffrey P Krischer; Charles Ansong; Astrid M Suchy-Dicey; Carmella Evans-Molina; Wei-Jun Qian; Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; Thomas O Metz
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 17.021

6.  Emerging mass spectrometry-based proteomics methodologies for novel biomedical applications.

Authors:  Lindsay K Pino; Jacob Rose; Amy O'Broin; Samah Shah; Birgit Schilling
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.407

7.  Improved One-Class Modeling of High-Dimensional Metabolomics Data via Eigenvalue-Shrinkage.

Authors:  Alberto Brini; Vahe Avagyan; Ric C H de Vos; Jack H Vossen; Edwin R van den Heuvel; Jasper Engel
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-04-13

8.  Listening to your mass spectrometer: An open-source toolkit to visualize mass spectrometer data.

Authors:  Abed Pablo; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Patrick C Mathias
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 9.  Review of the Use of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratories: Part II-Operations.

Authors:  Brian A Rappold
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.941

10.  Parallel Multi-Omics in High-Risk Subjects for the Identification of Integrated Biomarker Signatures of Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Oscar Alcazar; Luis F Hernandez; Ernesto S Nakayasu; Carrie D Nicora; Charles Ansong; Michael J Muehlbauer; James R Bain; Ciara J Myer; Sanjoy K Bhattacharya; Peter Buchwald; Midhat H Abdulreda
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.