Literature DB >> 24493410

Virtual screening with AutoDock Vina and the common pharmacophore engine of a low diversity library of fragments and hits against the three allosteric sites of HIV integrase: participation in the SAMPL4 protein-ligand binding challenge.

Alexander L Perryman1, Daniel N Santiago1, Stefano Forli1, Diogo Santos Martins1,2, Arthur J Olson1.   

Abstract

To rigorously assess the tools and protocols that can be used to understand and predict macromolecular recognition, and to gain more structural insight into three newly discovered allosteric binding sites on a critical drug target involved in the treatment of HIV infections, the Olson and Levy labs collaborated on the SAMPL4 challenge. This computational blind challenge involved predicting protein-ligand binding against the three allosteric sites of HIV integrase (IN), a viral enzyme for which two drugs (that target the active site) have been approved by the FDA. Positive control cross-docking experiments were utilized to select 13 receptor models out of an initial ensemble of 41 different crystal structures of HIV IN. These 13 models of the targets were selected using our new "Rank Difference Ratio" metric. The first stage of SAMPL4 involved using virtual screens to identify 62 active, allosteric IN inhibitors out of a set of 321 compounds. The second stage involved predicting the binding site(s) and crystallographic binding mode(s) for 57 of these inhibitors. Our team submitted four entries for the first stage that utilized: (1) AutoDock Vina (AD Vina) plus visual inspection; (2) a new common pharmacophore engine; (3) BEDAM replica exchange free energy simulations, and a Consensus approach that combined the predictions of all three strategies. Even with the SAMPL4's very challenging compound library that displayed a significantly lower amount of structural diversity than most libraries that are conventionally employed in prospective virtual screens, these approaches produced hit rates of 24, 25, 34, and 27 %, respectively, on a set with 19 % declared binders. Our only entry for the second stage challenge was based on the results of AD Vina plus visual inspection, and it ranked third place overall according to several different metrics provided by the SAMPL4 organizers. The successful results displayed by these approaches highlight the utility of the computational structure-based drug discovery tools and strategies that are being developed to advance the goals of the newly created, multi-institution, NIH-funded center called the "HIV Interaction and Viral Evolution Center".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24493410      PMCID: PMC4053500          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9709-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  33 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Structural basis for drug and substrate specificity exhibited by FIV encoding a chimeric FIV/HIV protease.

Authors:  Ying Chuan Lin; Alexander L Perryman; Arthur J Olson; Bruce E Torbett; John H Elder; C David Stout
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-05-12

3.  Fragment-based design of ligands targeting a novel site on the integrase enzyme of human immunodeficiency virus 1.

Authors:  Jerome Wielens; Stephen J Headey; John J Deadman; David I Rhodes; Giang T Le; Michael W Parker; David K Chalmers; Martin J Scanlon
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Parallel screening of low molecular weight fragment libraries: do differences in methodology affect hit identification?

Authors:  Jerome Wielens; Stephen J Headey; David I Rhodes; Roger J Mulder; Olan Dolezal; John J Deadman; Janet Newman; David K Chalmers; Michael W Parker; Thomas S Peat; Martin J Scanlon
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2012-11-08

5.  Virtual screening of integrase inhibitors by large scale binding free energy calculations: the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Nanjie Deng; Peng He; Lauren Wickstrom; Alexander L Perryman; Daniel N Santiago; Stefano Forli; Arthur J Olson; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  The Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for the Estimation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Mauro Lapelosa; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Small molecule inhibitors of the LEDGF site of human immunodeficiency virus integrase identified by fragment screening and structure based design.

Authors:  Thomas S Peat; David I Rhodes; Nick Vandegraaff; Giang Le; Jessica A Smith; Lisa J Clark; Eric D Jones; Jonathan A V Coates; Neeranat Thienthong; Janet Newman; Olan Dolezal; Roger Mulder; John H Ryan; G Paul Savage; Craig L Francis; John J Deadman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21

10.  Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform.

Authors:  Marcus D Hanwell; Donald E Curtis; David C Lonie; Tim Vandermeersch; Eva Zurek; Geoffrey R Hutchison
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 5.514

View more
  19 in total

1.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Haoyuan Chen; He Chen; Michael Fitzgerald; Yang Gao; Peng He; Malathi Kalyanikar; Chuan Kao; Beidi Lu; Yijie Niu; Manasi Pethe; Jie Zhu; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  A virtual screen discovers novel, fragment-sized inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis InhA.

Authors:  Alexander L Perryman; Weixuan Yu; Xin Wang; Sean Ekins; Stefano Forli; Shao-Gang Li; Joel S Freundlich; Peter J Tonge; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Virtual screening of integrase inhibitors by large scale binding free energy calculations: the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Nanjie Deng; Peng He; Lauren Wickstrom; Alexander L Perryman; Daniel N Santiago; Stefano Forli; Arthur J Olson; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Combining in silico and in cerebro approaches for virtual screening and pose prediction in SAMPL4.

Authors:  Arnout R D Voet; Ashutosh Kumar; Francois Berenger; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Improving Prediction Accuracy of Binding Free Energies and Poses of HIV Integrase Complexes Using the Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method with Flattening Potentials.

Authors:  Junchao Xia; William Flynn; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Massive-Scale Binding Free Energy Simulations of HIV Integrase Complexes Using Asynchronous Replica Exchange Framework Implemented on the IBM WCG Distributed Network.

Authors:  Junchao Xia; William Flynn; Emilio Gallicchio; Keith Uplinger; Jonathan D Armstrong; Stefano Forli; Arthur J Olson; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Juyong Lee; Florentina Tofoleanu; Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Ana Damjanović; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method: Hamiltonian Replica Exchange with Torsional Flattening for Binding Mode Prediction and Binding Free Energy Estimation.

Authors:  Ahmet Mentes; Nan-Jie Deng; R S K Vijayan; Junchao Xia; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Property-Unmatched Decoys in Docking Benchmarks.

Authors:  Reed M Stein; Ying Yang; Trent E Balius; Matt J O'Meara; Jiankun Lyu; Jennifer Young; Khanh Tang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Distinguishing binders from false positives by free energy calculations: fragment screening against the flap site of HIV protease.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; Stefano Forli; Peng He; Alex Perryman; Lauren Wickstrom; R S K Vijayan; Theresa Tiefenbrunn; David Stout; Emilio Gallicchio; Arthur J Olson; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.