PURPOSE: To investigate a method for selecting a protocol for body CT scan to acquire monochromatic images (MIs) by gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) with or without adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We subjected a phantom to conventional scanning at 120 kVp and 50-700 mAs and GSI at 165-600 mAs; reconstructed MIs at 65 keV with ASiR 0-100 % for GSI; placed 5 regions of interest on each of 3 consecutive reconstructed slices to obtain the averaged standard deviation (SD) as image noise for conventional scan and GSI. Linear regression analysis yielded the mAs by conventional scan that could be used to achieve similar image noise by GSI. RESULTS: To achieve similar noise, we found excellent linear correlation of mAs between GSI with ASiR 0-100 % and conventional scan (r = 1.00, P < 0.0001), and obtained a table of equivalent mAs between MIs at 65 keV and conventional CT at 120 kVp. CONCLUSIONS: We can select a protocol for body CT scan for MIs at 65 keV with or without ASiR with results comparable to those of conventional CT at 120 kVp.
PURPOSE: To investigate a method for selecting a protocol for body CT scan to acquire monochromatic images (MIs) by gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) with or without adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We subjected a phantom to conventional scanning at 120 kVp and 50-700 mAs and GSI at 165-600 mAs; reconstructed MIs at 65 keV with ASiR 0-100 % for GSI; placed 5 regions of interest on each of 3 consecutive reconstructed slices to obtain the averaged standard deviation (SD) as image noise for conventional scan and GSI. Linear regression analysis yielded the mAs by conventional scan that could be used to achieve similar image noise by GSI. RESULTS: To achieve similar noise, we found excellent linear correlation of mAs between GSI with ASiR 0-100 % and conventional scan (r = 1.00, P < 0.0001), and obtained a table of equivalent mAs between MIs at 65 keV and conventional CT at 120 kVp. CONCLUSIONS: We can select a protocol for body CT scan for MIs at 65 keV with or without ASiR with results comparable to those of conventional CT at 120 kVp.
Authors: Yoshiko Sagara; Amy K Hara; William Pavlicek; Alvin C Silva; Robert G Paden; Qing Wu Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Priyanka Prakash; Mannudeep K Kalra; Avinash K Kambadakone; Homer Pien; Jiang Hsieh; Michael A Blake; Dushyant V Sahani Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Alvin C Silva; Brian G Morse; Amy K Hara; Robert G Paden; Norio Hongo; William Pavlicek Journal: Radiographics Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Jiang Hsieh; Paul E Licato; Synho Do; Homer H Pien; Michael A Blake Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Johannes Kahn; Uli Fehrenbach; Georg Böning; Felix Feldhaus; Martin Maurer; Diane Renz; Florian Streitparth Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 1.817