Literature DB >> 29378026

Individual stability in vocalization rates of preweaning piglets.

M Špinka1, M Syrová2,3, R Policht1, P Linhart1.   

Abstract

Piglet vocalization rates are used as welfare indicators. The emission rates of the two gross categories of piglet calls, namely low frequency calls ("grunts") and high frequency calls ("screams"), may contain different information about the piglet's internal state due to differing communicative functions of the two call types. More knowledge is needed about the sources of variation in calling rates within and between piglets. We examined to what extent the emission rates of the two call types are codetermined by individual and litter identity, i.e., whether the rates are repeatable within individuals and similar between littermates. We recorded frequency of grunts and screams in one mildly negative (short-term Isolation) and one moderately negative (manual Restraint) situation during the first week (week 1) and the 4th week (week 4) of life and asked the following questions: 1) Are within-individual vocalization rates stable across the suckling period? 2) Are within-individual vocalization rates stable across the two situations? 3) Is there within-litter similarity in vocalization rates? 4) Does this within-litter similarity increase during the suckling period? Within-individual vocalization rates were stable between week 1 and week 4 (grunts in Restraint P < 0.05; grunts in Isolation P < 0.001; screams in Restraint P < 0.001; screams in Isolation P < 0.001). Across the two situations at the same age, the vocalization rates were not stable for grunts but were stable for screams at week 1 and week 4 (P < 0.05). Vocalization rates were more similar between littermates than between piglets belonging to different litters (grunts in Restraint P < 0.001; grunts in Isolation P < 0.01; screams in Restraint P < 0.001; screams in Isolation P < 0.001). This litter effect did not grow stronger from week 1 to week 4 as the within-litter coefficient of variance did not decrease between the two ages. Sex of the piglet had no influence on vocalization rates while greater body weight was associated with lower screaming rates in the Restraint situation (P < 0.05). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that both individuality of the piglet and litter identity affect the vocalization rates of piglets in negatively valenced situations. For screams, the repeatability of individual vocalization rates holds even across situations, while for grunts, the rates are repeatable during ontogeny within the situations, but not across situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29378026      PMCID: PMC6140939          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Vocal responses of piglets to castration: identifying procedural sources of pain.

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.448

2.  Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered in combination.

Authors:  J N Marchant-Forde; D C Lay; K A McMunn; H W Cheng; E A Pajor; R M Marchant-Forde
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The vocalizations of ungulates, their causation and function.

Authors:  M Kiley
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1972-08

4.  Ontogeny of individual and litter identity signaling in grunts of piglets.

Authors:  Michaela Syrová; Richard Policht; Pavel Linhart; Marek Špinka
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered separately.

Authors:  J N Marchant-Forde; D C Lay; K A McMunn; H W Cheng; E A Pajor; R M Marchant-Forde
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Expression of Emotional Arousal in Two Different Piglet Call Types.

Authors:  Pavel Linhart; Victoria F Ratcliffe; David Reby; Marek Špinka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Encoding of situations in the vocal repertoire of piglets (Sus scrofa): a comparison of discrete and graded classifications.

Authors:  Céline Tallet; Pavel Linhart; Richard Policht; Kurt Hammerschmidt; Petr Šimeček; Petra Kratinova; Marek Špinka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Calling by domestic piglets during simulated crushing and isolation: a signal of need?

Authors:  Gudrun Illmann; Kurt Hammerschmidt; Marek Spinka; Céline Tallet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Structural Classification of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) Vocalizations.

Authors:  Maxime Garcia; Bruno Gingras; Daniel L Bowling; Christian T Herbst; Markus Boeckle; Yann Locatelli; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.897

10.  Acoustic signalling reflects personality in a social mammal.

Authors:  Mary Friel; Hansjoerg P Kunc; Kym Griffin; Lucy Asher; Lisa M Collins
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.