Literature DB >> 24487213

Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder.

Tyler J Vanderweele1, Stijn Vansteelandt, James M Robins.   

Abstract

Methods from causal mediation analysis have generalized the traditional approach to direct and indirect effects in the epidemiologic and social science literature by allowing for interaction and nonlinearities. However, the methods from the causal inference literature have themselves been subject to a major limitation, in that the so-called natural direct and indirect effects that are used are not identified from data whenever there is a mediator-outcome confounder that is also affected by the exposure. In this article, we describe three alternative approaches to effect decomposition that give quantities that can be interpreted as direct and indirect effects and that can be identified from data even in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder. We describe a simple weighting-based estimation method for each of these three approaches, illustrated with data from perinatal epidemiology. The methods described here can shed insight into pathways and questions of mediation even when an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder is present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24487213      PMCID: PMC4214081          DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  15 in total

1.  Direct effect models.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  A general approach to causal mediation analysis.

Authors:  Kosuke Imai; Luke Keele; Dustin Tingley
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-12

3.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Estimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Concerning the consistency assumption in causal inference.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Natural direct and indirect effects on the exposed: effect decomposition under weaker assumptions.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt; Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  A comparison of four prenatal care indices in birth outcome models: comparable results for predicting small-for-gestational-age outcome but different results for preterm birth or infant mortality.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; John D Lantos; Juned Siddique; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.363

View more
  69 in total

1.  Are Early-Life Socioeconomic Conditions Directly Related to Birth Outcomes? Grandmaternal Education, Grandchild Birth Weight, and Associated Bias Analyses.

Authors:  Jonathan Y Huang; Amelia R Gavin; Thomas S Richardson; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; David S Siscovick; Daniel A Enquobahrie
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Mediation of Neighborhood Effects on Adolescent Substance Use by the School and Peer Environments.

Authors:  Kara E Rudolph; Oleg Sofrygin; Nicole M Schmidt; Rebecca Crowder; M Maria Glymour; Jennifer Ahern; Theresa L Osypuk
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Mediation analysis for a survival outcome with time-varying exposures, mediators, and confounders.

Authors:  Sheng-Hsuan Lin; Jessica G Young; Roger Logan; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Defining causal mediation with a longitudinal mediator and a survival outcome.

Authors:  Vanessa Didelez
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Early life disadvantage and adult adiposity: tests of sensitive periods during childhood and behavioural mediation in adulthood.

Authors:  Stephen E Gilman; Yen-Tsung Huang; Marcia P Jimenez; Golareh Agha; Su H Chu; Charles B Eaton; Risë B Goldstein; Karl T Kelsey; Stephen L Buka; Eric B Loucks
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Interventional Effects for Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt; Rhian M Daniel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Integrative modeling of multi-platform genomic data under the framework of mediation analysis.

Authors:  Yen-Tsung Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators.

Authors:  T J VanderWeele; S Vansteelandt
Journal:  Epidemiol Methods       Date:  2014-01

9.  Causal mediation analysis with a binary outcome and multiple continuous or ordinal mediators: Simulations and application to an alcohol intervention.

Authors:  Trang Quynh Nguyen; Yenny Webb-Vargas; Ina M Koning; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.125

10.  Sparse Principal Component based High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  Yi Zhao; Martin A Lindquist; Brian S Caffo
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 1.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.