Literature DB >> 22989075

Natural direct and indirect effects on the exposed: effect decomposition under weaker assumptions.

Stijn Vansteelandt1, Tyler J Vanderweele.   

Abstract

We define natural direct and indirect effects on the exposed. We show that these allow for effect decomposition under weaker identification conditions than population natural direct and indirect effects. When no confounders of the mediator-outcome association are affected by the exposure, identification is possible under essentially the same conditions as for controlled direct effects. Otherwise, identification is still possible with additional knowledge on a nonidentifiable selection-bias function which measures the dependence of the mediator effect on the observed exposure within confounder levels, and which evaluates to zero in a large class of realistic data-generating mechanisms. We argue that natural direct and indirect effects on the exposed are of intrinsic interest in various applications. We moreover show that they coincide with the corresponding population natural direct and indirect effects when the exposure is randomly assigned. In such settings, our results are thus also of relevance for assessing population natural direct and indirect effects in the presence of exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounding, which existing methodology has not been able to address.
© 2012, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22989075      PMCID: PMC3989894          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01777.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  19 in total

1.  Postmenopausal hormone use, screening, and breast cancer: characterization and control of a bias.

Authors:  M M Joffe; C Byrne; G A Colditz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Fallibility in estimating direct effects.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.

Authors:  Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Mediation and mechanism.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Discussion of "Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data".

Authors:  Dylan S Small; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  A comparison of four prenatal care indices in birth outcome models: comparable results for predicting small-for-gestational-age outcome but different results for preterm birth or infant mortality.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; John D Lantos; Juned Siddique; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  16 in total

1.  Sharp sensitivity bounds for mediation under unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding.

Authors:  Peng Ding; Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Interventional Effects for Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt; Rhian M Daniel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects in the presence of exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounders.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Yasutaka Chiba
Journal:  Epidemiol Biostat Public Health       Date:  2014

4.  Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Stijn Vansteelandt; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Causal mediation analysis with multiple causally non-ordered mediators.

Authors:  Masataka Taguri; John Featherstone; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Generalized causal mediation and path analysis: Extensions and practical considerations.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Albert; Jang Ik Cho; Yiying Liu; Suchitra Nelson
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Estimation of Natural Indirect Effects Robust to Unmeasured Confounding and Mediator Measurement Error.

Authors:  Isabel R Fulcher; Xu Shi; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Clarifying causal mediation analysis for the applied researcher: Defining effects based on what we want to learn.

Authors:  Trang Quynh Nguyen; Ian Schmid; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2020-07-16

9.  Mediation analysis with intermediate confounding: structural equation modeling viewed through the causal inference lens.

Authors:  Bianca L De Stavola; Rhian M Daniel; George B Ploubidis; Nadia Micali
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Postoperative delirium mediates 180-day mortality in orthopaedic trauma patients.

Authors:  Juan C Pedemonte; Haoqi Sun; Esteban Franco-Garcia; Carmen Zhou; Marilyn Heng; Sadeq A Quraishi; Brandon Westover; Oluwaseun Akeju
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 11.719

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.