Literature DB >> 19806060

Estimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies.

Stijn Vansteelandt1.   

Abstract

Estimating the effect of an exposure on an outcome, other than through some given mediator, requires adjustment for all risk factors of the mediator that are also associated with the outcome. When these risk factors are themselves affected by the exposure, then standard regression methods do not apply. In this article, I review methods for accommodating this and discuss their limitations for estimating the controlled direct effect (ie, the exposure effect when controlling the mediator at a specified level uniformly in the population). In addition, I propose a powerful and easy-to-apply alternative that uses G-estimation in structural nested models to address these limitations both for cohort and case-control studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19806060     DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181b6f4c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  41 in total

1.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of natural direct effects.

Authors:  Wenjing Zheng; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  A Viable Alternative When Propensity Scores Fail: Evaluation of Inverse Propensity Weighting and Sequential G-Estimation in a Two-Wave Mediation Model.

Authors:  Matthew J Valente; David P MacKinnon; Gina L Mazza
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Using marginal structural models to estimate the direct effect of adverse childhood social conditions on onset of heart disease, diabetes, and stroke.

Authors:  Arijit Nandi; M Maria Glymour; Ichiro Kawachi; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Left Truncation Bias to Explain the Protective Effect of Smoking on Preeclampsia: Potential, But How Plausible?

Authors:  Alan C Kinlaw; Jessie P Buckley; Stephanie M Engel; Charles Poole; M Alan Brookhart; Alexander P Keil
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis.

Authors:  David P MacKinnon; Angela G Pirlott
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-07-25

7.  Subtleties of explanatory language: what is meant by "mediation"?

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 8.  Identification of operating mediation and mechanism in the sufficient-component cause framework.

Authors:  Etsuji Suzuki; Eiji Yamamoto; Toshihide Tsuda
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Invited commentary: structural equation models and epidemiologic analysis.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Instrumental variable analysis of multiplicative models with potentially invalid instruments.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.